Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?

2015-07-14 Thread oshwm
doesn't someone have to mention hitler soon or is it too early for that? :D -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?

2015-07-14 Thread I
Why don't you write to each other instead of putting it where I see it? Robert > -Original Message- > From: juan@gmail.com > Sent: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 22:55:46 -0300 > To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org > Subject: Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"? > > On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 1

Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?

2015-07-14 Thread Juan
On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:13:46 -0700 Apple Apple wrote: > On 14 Jul 2015 22:31, "Juan" wrote: > > You just keep vomiting the same corrupt nonsense. > > > > Oh yeah, you are such galant defenders...of americunt > > fascism...which you try to pass as 'fighting oppressive > >

Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?

2015-07-14 Thread Mansour Moufid
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Drew Fustini wrote: > Greetings - I am a Tor Browser user and also an operator of a couple > Tor relays. I believe the Tor Project has a noble mission. > > An online friend recently claimed to me that "amoral content is a huge > portion of the exit node traffic".

Re: [tor-talk] pdf with tor

2015-07-14 Thread Niels Elgaard Larsen
On 13-07-2015 10:10, Apple Apple wrote: > On 13 Jul 2015 00:12, "Yuri" wrote: > PostScript is something entirely unrelated. It is a way of describing the > layout of documents with words, like a very early CSS or Latex. I remember > claims about it being Turing complete but I think that this is

Re: [tor-talk] pdf with tor

2015-07-14 Thread Niels Elgaard Larsen
On 13-07-2015 01:03, Yuri wrote: > On 07/12/2015 12:27, Niels Elgaard Larsen wrote: >> If you convert it to a safer format > > It is nothing inherently unsafe in pdf format itself, and any other > document formats aren't any safer. PDF is an extremely complex format, the specification is more t

Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?

2015-07-14 Thread Apple Apple
On 14 Jul 2015 22:31, "Juan" wrote: > You just keep vomiting the same corrupt nonsense. > > Oh yeah, you are such galant defenders...of americunt > fascism...which you try to pass as 'fighting oppressive > regimes'. Sick. I'm sorry I don't understand what you are t

[tor-talk] Fwd: Orbot v15.0.3-RC-3 is out (with Tor 0.2.6.10)

2015-07-14 Thread Nathan Freitas
- Original message - From: Nathan of Guardian To: guardian-...@lists.mayfirst.org Subject: Orbot v15.0.3-RC-3 is out (with Tor 0.2.6.10) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:36:08 -0400 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Orbot 15.0.1-RC-3 / 14-July-2015 APK: https://guardianproject.

Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?

2015-07-14 Thread Juan
On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 12:54:53 + Speak Freely wrote: > However, because you accused me of sending hate mail anonymously, I'd > like to explicitly refute that claim. Trust me, I wouldn't have sent > hate mail to you anonymously. Sure. Except that it just so happens that I get hate mail

Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?

2015-07-14 Thread Speak Freely
Juan, I don't know what you're talking about. I don't know what your fascination with me is. I have no reason to send you anonymous anything, as I have no reason to talk to you. You're nothing but a troll, and the only way to deal with trolls is to ignore them. However, because you accused me of