> FYI, we just discovered that this morning:
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/16381
Thanks. The ticket mentions a client-side expiration test that is not
working correctly. That corresponds to the messages I'm seeing in the log
file (and that tipped off to the problem):
"We alr
On 15 Jun (18:28:42), Allen wrote:
> Hi Donncha,
>
> One thing I think I'm seeing is that if I restart the tor process on a hidden
> server, it chooses new introduction points and any clients that have a cached
> service descriptor cannot access the hidden service until the cached
> descriptor
Hi Donncha,
One thing I think I'm seeing is that if I restart the tor process on a hidden
server, it chooses new introduction points and any clients that have a cached
service descriptor cannot access the hidden service until the cached descriptor
expires. This leads to an apparent service out
There is a comment in the torrc man page that exit policies can target the
local machine or private networks, like say :
ExitPolicy accept 127.0.0.1:80
ExitPolicy reject private:*
Does anyone actually do this? If so, how does one use it?
There are no ip address limits specified in the consensus
Remote is disabled by default, but there is --allow-remote to enable it.
Also check out https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/14977
because you can have some problems with it.
Colin Arnott:
> As a user of firefox, I am aware that when firefox is running, you can call
> [$ firefox ] or [
Thank you very much ;)
it work :)
On Jun 15, 2015 1:32 PM, "Jeffrey Burdges" wrote:
> I'd thought this worked if you ran :
>
> cd ~/tor-browser_en-US
> ./firefox --class "Tor Browser" -profile
> ./TorBrowser/Data/Browser/profile.default/
>
> Appears not anymore however. In fact, the "New Window
I'd thought this worked if you ran :
cd ~/tor-browser_en-US
./firefox --class "Tor Browser" -profile
./TorBrowser/Data/Browser/profile.default/
Appears not anymore however. In fact, the "New Window" created by the
start-tor-browser.desktop file in launcher/favorites no longer works either.
The
++ 15/06/15 06:59 +0200 - CJ:
>> Is there a way to get this functionality with the existing browser
>> bundle, as this feature works fine on vanilla Firefox? If not what
>> would be required to allow these requests to be forwarded to the
>> underling firefox process, or are there security/anonym
