On 5/21/15, grarpamp wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Paul A. Crable wrote:
>> I'd support censorship if I was in charge of it
>
> You won't be.
>
>> but I doubt most others would go along with my idea.
>
> No one here will be either. As you've discovered, it's
> non negotiable.
>
>> So
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Paul A. Crable wrote:
> I'd support censorship if I was in charge of it
You won't be.
> but I doubt most others would go along with my idea.
No one here will be either. As you've discovered, it's
non negotiable.
> So I guess we must leave things as they are, fl
On 21/05/15 01:31, thomas.hluch...@netcologne.de wrote:
Bonjour Christian,
About good & bad, right & wrong: fell free to discuss this with your
murder if he comes cutting your throat and kidnapping your daughter for
selling her as sex slave.
Lol! That the same kind of arguments the proponent
>Is there some way to keep TOR out of the hands of sleazebags and crooks?
I ask this myself often when I see people with mobile phones taking
intruding pictures of strangers for their amusement without regards to
other peoples privacy rights.
Is there some way to keep MOBILE PHONES with CAMERAS o
First, the author of "Future Crime" is Marc Goodman, not MacDonald as I
erroneously reported.
Second, thanks for the thoughtful replies. Your points about avoiding
censorship are well taken. I really can't think of any way to separate
the wheat from the chaff without some form of censorship. I'
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 06:48:52PM +0300, s7r wrote:
> Speaking of, it's a long time I have been asking myself this, why does
> a bridge with PT need a publicly open ORPort?
>
> I understand it for a regular bridge, no PT, but when I use PTs why
> should I also open the ORPort publicly? I understa
Hi Nathan,
many thanks for your quick reply!
On 2015-05-19, Nathan Freitas wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2015, at 04:33 PM, Jens Lechtenboerger wrote:
>> the usage instructions for Tor on Android at
>> https://www.torproject.org/docs/android.html.en
>> are unsafe for Firefox users.
>
>> Firefox on An
im not sure that using TOR on android is anonymous. Sure your favicons are
leaking your ip, however android itself is a leaky OS, that and backdoors
whatever agencies currently have.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Assistance_for_Law_Enforcement_Act#Technical_implementation
On Tue, Ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Speaking of, it's a long time I have been asking myself this, why does
a bridge with PT need a publicly open ORPort?
I understand it for a regular bridge, no PT, but when I use PTs why
should I also open the ORPort publicly? I understand the PT need
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 10:42:27AM +0800, Virgil Griffith wrote:
> Tom: If a hostile relay receives a connection from a ip-address A that
> is not listed in the Tor consensus, as far as I understand the hostile
> relay stills has two possibilities about ip-address A:
>
> (1) A is the client
> (2)
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 06:05:11PM +, reza-ask...@riseup.net wrote:
> and i think it seams funny that you use google app engine to unblock tor in
> countries like Iran
> and then google blocks Iranian access to that service.
There is also meek-azure and meek-amazon, but they might have the sam
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Bonjour Christian,
it was me, not Paul. I am not talking in myth, I am talking in imaginations and
I feel free to use dear god in my pictures. Who can say this is right or wrong?
You? Me? Dear god himself? I am free and I am painting my imaginations in my
way. You may like it or not.
About goo
On Wed, 20 May 2015 08:35:00 thomas.hluch...@netcologne.de wrote:
> Hello Paul,
>
> when dear god in heaven decided to construct earth, he implemented the sun
> in such way, that it shines over the good and the bad ones. Think about
> that. All criminals can do their bad things with help of the da
On Wed, 20 May 2015 11:38:08 +0200
Casey Callendrello wrote:
> Frankly, Tor's twelve-year delay in implementing RFC 3514* is a stain
> upon its reputation.
>
There's no parody like unintentional self-parody.
> --Casey
>
> * Note the published date.
>
> On 5/20/15 6:20 AM, Chri
Frankly, Tor's twelve-year delay in implementing RFC 3514* is a stain
upon its reputation.
--Casey
* Note the published date.
On 5/20/15 6:20 AM, Christian Gagneraud wrote:
>
> Even if there was some ways, who would then decide what a bad guy is
> and what a good one is, what is legal and what's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20.05.2015 05:10, Paul A. Crable wrote:
> I suppose I sound like a disapproving fussbudget, but I have
> trouble understanding how and why we allow TOR to be used this way.
> I'm all for free speech, but it's still illegal to falsely yell
> "Fire!"
Henrik Lund Kramshøj:
> First, a society with NO CRIME would be a terrible idea. Since this
> would require 1984 to be fully implemented, and such a dystopian
> society would consist of slaves.
It's funny how people reference books without even bothering to read. In
1984 crime is rampant. Not only
Paul A. Crable:
> I have just finished Macdonald's "Future Crime", a recent book listing the
> ways in which we are all abused and insulted, and will be further abused
Not *we*. You. You felt somewhat like that. And you badly need to start
a revolt. Most probably your name was not even mentioned i
Hello Paul,
when dear god in heaven decided to construct earth, he implemented the sun in
such way, that it shines over the good and the bad ones. Think about that. All
criminals can do their bad things with help of the daylight. The sunlight is
completely neutral, shining for everybody.
What
20 matches
Mail list logo
