On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 10:41:46PM +, Patrick Schleizer wrote:
> We want to get rid of SSL and make use of the strong security properties
> of Tor's end-to-end encryption for Hidden Services in order to safeguard
> against clearnet SSL MITM attacks, which are within reach of powerful
> adversar
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 05:09:00PM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> Kevin wrote (09 Feb 2015 15:59:53 GMT) :
> > Why is it no longer supported?
>
> Because there are better options for the use cases the Tor Project is
> actively supporting, and nobody has volunteered to maintain Vidalia
> upstream in the
Griffin Boyce:
> The services that I trust the most are the ones I operate myself, and
> for myself.
Forgot to say, they need to be for public use.
> Aside from those, the duckduckgo hidden service has been
> really useful and has good uptime as well.
Good one.
--
tor-talk mailing list - to
meejah:
>
> Certainly not "great amouts of traffic",
Indeed. That is too much of a requirement.
> but the hidden-service which
> serves txtorcon docs and releases is stable:
>
> http://timaq4ygg2iegci7.onion/
Good one.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe o
There seems to be a lot of interest in WebRTC Tor safety lately on this
list. The simple https://diafygi.github.io/webrtc-ips/ PoC does not work
against Tor Browser for two reasons:
1. We don't compile in WebRTC at all.
2. We set the pref 'media.peerconnection.enabled' to false.
We would like to
Certainly not "great amouts of traffic", but the hidden-service which
serves txtorcon docs and releases is stable:
http://timaq4ygg2iegci7.onion/
--
meejah
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bi
Patrick Schleizer wrote:
What web servers do you consider trustworthy, to take great care of
their visitors' privacy, that are stable and that get great amounts of
traffic, and most important, are reachable over .onion as a Tor Hidden
Service?
Please post them here.
The services that I trust
TLDR:
What web servers do you consider trustworthy, to take great care of
their visitors' privacy, that are stable and that get great amounts of
traffic, and most important, are reachable over .onion as a Tor Hidden
Service?
Please post them here.
--
Long:
Background... For distributed
Kevin wrote (09 Feb 2015 15:59:53 GMT) :
> Why is it no longer supported?
Because there are better options for the use cases the Tor Project is
actively supporting, and nobody has volunteered to maintain Vidalia
upstream in the last few years.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-
On 2/8/2015 11:30 PM, Piotr Zyrko wrote:
podpis
9 lut 2015 05:20 "Sebastian Hahn" napisał(a):
Hi tor-talk,
we have stopped updating our Vidalia bundles a long time ago, today I've
removed the download links and related documentation from the Website.
At this time, Vidalia has been unmaintained
On 2015-02-09 9:51 am, Yuri wrote:
On 02/09/2015 00:55, spencer...@openmailbox.org wrote:
Yes, "..separate identification from routing.”, but isn't Tor
filtering my connection to the internet by routing my connection
through its network? Because, if so, I am wondering if it is possible
to h
On 02/09/2015 00:55, spencer...@openmailbox.org wrote:
Yes, "..separate identification from routing.”, but isn't Tor
filtering my connection to the internet by routing my connection
through its network? Because, if so, I am wondering if it is possible
to have that onion routing process do mo
SpencerOne spencerone[at]openmailbox.org:
Awesome, the Transport Layer, right? But couldn't things on the
Application Layer be filtered through Tor before they make it to the
Network Layer? Isn't that what's happening with things like Orbot?
Aren't applications proxied using SOCKS or HTTP, essen
SpencerOne spencerone[at]openmailbox.org:
Is there any risk to this [Whonix on a VM] like with Tails, or is
Whonix built to function this way?
WhonixQubes whonixqubes[at]riseup.net:
Hi!
Whonix is optimized to run as virtual machines.
It does also run on physical machines, but is optimized for
14 matches
Mail list logo
