On 01/27/2015 06:28, Öyvind Saether wrote:
This is clearly not why they are blocking Tor. Yelp has decided that
you can't read their website anonymously. If they were blocking http(s)
POST requests then that would be another story. As someone who has a
bunch of websites myself I do have some unde
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 7:55 AM, wrote:
> Why doesn't everyone just use UTC in the Date: header and then the
> computer that the mail is being read on converts it to local time?
Seems a good overall approach if you did not want to accept
the confusion of the date/TZ the server would add upon rea
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 06:28:45 -0800, Öyvind Saether
wrote:
you can't read their website anonymously. If they were blocking http(s)
POST requests then that would be another story. As someone who has a
bunch of websites myself I do have some understanding as to why someone
would block http(s) PO
> One other thing they try to protect from is people writing reviews
> for their own businesses. If someone logs into Yelp as the business
> owner and as a reviewer from the same IP, they would make such review
> "not recommended" (previously they made it "hidden" and protected
> with captcha). And
I can't get how they can spy by UTC?
If i sends it at UTC+6 and he received it same time at UTC-6,
receiver will find in header UTC time.
So whats the problem, how can he convert it to +12? oO
It seems to be paranoid style worrying about date time header.
Problem is when Date header not set to UTC,
Why doesn't everyone just use UTC in the Date: header and then the
computer that the mail is being read on converts it to local time? This
just makes it so people can spy on where you are/
> On 1/27/15, Dave Warren wrote:
>> On 2015-01-26 03:10, Cypher wrote:
>>> Also, since the only
>>> data lea
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Vignesh Prabhu wrote:
> From what I understand there are two main issues still pending which
> might lead to compromise of user's identity and unless that is fixed, it
> is not completely safe to use Torbirdy.
>
> The issues are:
> https://trac.torproject.org/proje
English is the shit!
Thanks.
Philipp Defner:
>>> In short, TorBirdy is the shit!
>> Why torbirdy is shit?
>
>
> There’s a difference [1], he’s saying it’s great and you should be fine using
> it.
>
> [1] http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=the+shit
>
> On 27 Jan 2015, at 09:01, For
>> In short, TorBirdy is the shit!
> Why torbirdy is shit?
There’s a difference [1], he’s saying it’s great and you should be fine using
it.
[1] http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=the+shit
On 27 Jan 2015, at 09:01, Formidable wrote:
> Why torbirdy is shit?
> Only because it leave
This is header what i see in my sent message:
Message-ID: <54c745e2.3070...@riseup.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:01:38 +
From: Formidable
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Torbirdy
References: <1c5d656d493ac75cbe3cb229cf0ab...@openmailbox.org>
In-Rep
Why torbirdy is shit?
Only because it leave in header system's timezone?
spencer...@openmailbox.org:
> Cypher cypher at cpunk.us:
>>> A few months ago, I seem to remember the general advice being not to
>>> use Torbirdy. But I see the software was updated only a few months ago
>>> so I assume it's
11 matches
Mail list logo
