On Saturday 01 November 2014 12:42:41 coderman wrote:
> On 11/1/14, Lars Boegild Thomsen wrote:
> first question, did you contact Tor Project Inc. about this for their
> input? (if yes, what was their take on your aims?)
No, we haven't done that yet apart from me trying to start this discussion h
"I can't imagine why nobody takes something called dogecoin seriously"
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Артур Истомин wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 07:50:24PM -0700,
> bm-2cuqbqhfvdhuy34zcpl3pngkplueeer...@bitmessage.ch wrote:
>> Please stop doing masked advertising to this mail list.
>>
>> W
On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 07:50:24PM -0700,
bm-2cuqbqhfvdhuy34zcpl3pngkplueeer...@bitmessage.ch wrote:
> Please stop doing masked advertising to this mail list.
>
> What makes a client sure that DogecoinDark software protects them against
> malicious peers feeding them scrambled data? What are the
On Saturday 01 November 2014 14:28:33 Soul Plane wrote:
> What happens when a new version of Tor comes out?
At source level what would happen is that I update one Makefile to pull the new
version of Tor and then build a new firmware. Provided Tor hasn't changed in a
way that causes it not to bu
On Saturday 01 November 2014 12:39:59 Aymeric Vitte wrote:
> https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1227374637/cloak, I would say that
> the presentation is less "marketing oriented" than the anonaflop, after
> a quick look, maybe the look of the box and its size does not appear
> obvious to the p
Please stop doing masked advertising to this mail list.
What makes a client sure that DogecoinDark software protects them against
malicious peers feeding them scrambled data? What are the protections?
Why the hell would someone use DogecoinDark anyway? Who si that dumb? Tor
community is not a sui
Hey Guys,
I'm associated with the DogeCoinDark project (I run one of the
supernodes) and I just wanted to let everyone know that the coin is now
fully dark and the super nodes accessible via Tor.
If you have the DogecoinDark wallet software, you can instruct it to
connect to the following Tor sup
> By using Facebook as a hidden service at least it is clearly a matter
> of what I choose to tell Facebook and I don't have to worry about
> someone else spying on the traffic. I agree that in the end that
> boils down to if you trust Facebook or not :)
My main problem with Facebook is that it i
Hi Colin!
Long story short: browser-side CDN onion translation is probably wasted effort
to attempt right now and may-or-may-not be viable long term.
This is partly because of impending experimentation/improvements - this is a
moving target - plus also that paths like /foo/bar.jpg will likely m
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Mirimir wrote:
> On 11/01/2014 02:22 AM, grarpamp wrote:
>> I would never use this unless you were actually censored from
>> accessing facebook via clearnet. All it will do is serve to officially
>> tell facebook that you are a tor user that FB can then further
>> d
On 11/01/2014 02:22 AM, grarpamp wrote:
> I would never use this unless you were actually censored from
> accessing facebook via clearnet. All it will do is serve to officially
> tell facebook that you are a tor user that FB can then further
> discriminate against as a class in the future once they
On 11/1/14, Lars Boegild Thomsen wrote:
> ... We - the team behind Cloak - and me (the
> networking and embedded Linux guy in the team) are genuinely concerned about
> privacy and we really would like this product to ...
first question, did you contact Tor Project Inc. about this for their
input?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hey Alec,
I'm one of the developers on darkweb-everywhere. I was playing around
with having fbcdn.net redirect to
fbcdn23dssr3jqnq.onion with a rule, hoping to cover instances where
people have linked directly to images from Facebook.
Since the cer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 11/01/2014 06:52 AM, Lars Boegild Thomsen wrote:
>
> the key here being "selectively". Using Facebook is a choice - users of
> Facebook chose
> to accept the terms.
>
*** Theoretically yes, but in reality there are many reasons why
Facebook m
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 5:09 AM, Lars Boegild Thomsen <
l...@reclaim-your-privacy.com> wrote:
> First of all, I would like to hear more opinions about the value of a
> device such as this. I realize that most technically adept people will
> frown on a a "toy" such as the Cloak, but this device is r
Hi,
I've installed TorBirdy, successfully, I think.
However, when I go to
"Open TorBirdy preferences" -> "Test Proxy Settings"
it complaints about I'm not using TBB, in despite it is installed
and running.
More over, if I shut TBB down, icedove stops
sending/receiving email. On the other side,
Good day,
I am new to this list, but not so new to TOR.
I was using https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TransparentProxy
as a guide to create a similair case of transparant proxy. I used my own script
though.
First I would like to point out that the following rules did not work f
On Freitag, 31. Oktober 2014, 12:23:02 Mike Cardwell wrote:
> https://www.facebook.com/notes/protect-the-graph/making-connections-to-facebook-more-secure/1526085754298237
>
> So Facebook have managed to brute force a hidden service key for:
>
> http://facebookcorewwwi.onion/
>
> If they have th
On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 04:22:22AM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
> I would never use this unless you were actually censored from
> accessing facebook via clearnet. All it will do is serve to officially
> tell facebook that you are a tor user that FB can then further
> discriminate against as a class in th
Probably it's useful to put the kickstarter link:
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1227374637/cloak, I would say that
the presentation is less "marketing oriented" than the anonaflop, after
a quick look, maybe the look of the box and its size does not appear
obvious to the potential pledger
On Saturday 01 November 2014 04:22:22 grarpamp wrote:
> Such non optional elements, and choices, powers and rights
> removed from the user, are in direct opposition to the principles
> of Tor and anonymity. Normally support for onion/i2p is good thing,
> but when still backed by crap like this it's
Hi Everybody,
As some of you may have noticed, a new Tor Router project called Cloak was just
launched on Kickstarter. In the wake of the Anonabox roller coaster, I would
like to present our own justification for the Cloak project, and a bit of
background. Please accept my apology if this come
I would never use this unless you were actually censored from
accessing facebook via clearnet. All it will do is serve to officially
tell facebook that you are a tor user that FB can then further
discriminate against as a class in the future once they start to
lock down clearnet against exit nodes,
23 matches
Mail list logo
