Nima Fatemi wrote:
Seems like the one mentioned in #11515 is gone, either those letters
have been actually effective or the maintainer decided to remove the
project (which imo is unlikely to be the case).
I say it's worth a shot to submit another complaint for these two
forks.
I've complain
Andrew Lewman wrote:
> On 09/22/2014 05:42 PM, grarpamp wrote:
>
>> What's the trac ticket for these, or this sort of thing?
>
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/11515
>
> Sourceforge/Dice don't care. We even sent them snail mail to no effect.
>
Seems like the one mentioned in #
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 3:12 AM, Bernd Stramm wrote:
> To the extent that linux versions of these projects are available, I put
> them in the opensuse build system.
> From there you can get RPMs, and a few DEBs, including the source versions.
> OBS signs them.
If I wanted to try Unix/OBS versions
On 09/22/2014 05:42 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> What's the trac ticket for these, or this sort of thing?
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/11515
Sourceforge/Dice don't care. We even sent them snail mail to no effect.
--
Andrew
pgp 0x6B4D6475
https://www.torproject.org/
+1-781-948-1982
Whether clones or worse, there's something
very weird going on with these guys.
http://browser4tor.sourceforge.net/
http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/
Has anyone dissected this software?
Was this issue ever resolved?
Does anyone know of any other instances and
URL's where a TPO project has been
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Colin Mahns wrote:
> I like how a couple of the alternatives to "Tor" in this article are
> Tails and Whonix. What do they use for anonymity again? Oh yeah, Tor...
>
> They also list Disconnect and Tox as an alternative, and then quickly
> say they aren't alternati
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 2:55 AM, grarpamp wrote:
>> https://cpunks.org//pipermail/cypherpunks/2014-September/005507.html
>
> Reply in thread please.
>
>> the point was that I would not use bleep messenger from bittorrent, as
>> it is not open source.
>
> The point in this particular thread is... t
On 20/09/14 06:32, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On 9/20/14, Артур Истомин wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:33:57PM +0100, Nick Sheppard wrote:
Interesting Guardian article today: Putin considers plan to unplug Russia
from the internet 'in an emergency'.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/19
Hi Georg,
Hard to say but the problem is that the PositiveSSL CA 2 is not in the
trust store in Firefox based browsers. That's why your issue is showing
up. The owner of the page is probably not using/not testing with Firefox
and thus not aware of it.
well, I tested with several Firefoxes on diff
Funny article indeed...
But the homework was not so good, he forgot Peersm (!!), and we learn
that Peerblock is free, but the article forget to mention that the
blocklists are not free :-), so Peerblock without blocklists is probably
not very efficient...
And when we look at the blocklists t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
This writer has absolutely no clew what she/he is writing about.
Absolutely no scientific proof, just copy/paste the FAQ articles of some sites
and claim TOR is compromised.
Sad how disinformation again finds its way on a "professional" homepage..
Il 21/09/2014 13:49, Christian Stadelmann ha scritto:
> b) using Tor
> This is a bad idea too since I regularly fetch some hundred RSS/Atom
> files, some of them via unencrypted HTTP. This would clearly undermine
> all anonymity provided by tor.
Do you mean that the hundreds rss feeds are a uniqu
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014, at 07:49 AM, Christian Stadelmann wrote:
> b) using Tor
> This is a bad idea too since I regularly fetch some hundred
RSS/Atom
> files, some of them via unencrypted HTTP. This would clearly
undermine
> all anonymity provided by tor. This problem gets even worse
when th
I like how a couple of the alternatives to "Tor" in this article are
Tails and Whonix. What do they use for anonymity again? Oh yeah, Tor...
They also list Disconnect and Tox as an alternative, and then quickly
say they aren't alternatives. I'd say this writer was hoping for clickbait.
Colin
Vir
Article named "Best Alternatives to Tor: 12 Programs to Use Since NSA,
Hackers Compromised Tor Project":
http://www.idigitaltimes.com/best-alternatives-tor-12-programs-use-nsa-hackers-compromised-tor-project-376976
Some quotes:
"Tor has been compromised, the Tor Project has recently suffered fro
Hartmut Haase wrote:
> Hi,
> when I try to open www.stayfriends.de I get the following message:
>
> Dieser Verbindung wird nicht vertraut
>
> Sie haben TorBrowser angewiesen, eine gesicherte Verbindung zu
> www.stayfriends.de aufzubauen, es kann aber nicht überprüft werden, ob
> die Verbindung si
Articles like these are irresponsible. But at least the journalist did
sufficient homework to find a few "alternatives" I hadn't heard of.
-V
On Monday, September 22, 2014, Katya Titov wrote:
> Article named "Best Alternatives to Tor: 12 Programs to Use Since NSA,
> Hackers Compromised Tor Pro
17 matches
Mail list logo
