Mike Perry wrote:
> Are there any 10.6 32bit Mac users on this list? Is Tails a workable
> option for you?
>
Hi Mike,
Sorry for chiming in belatedly on this question. I still see emails
from Mac 10.5 users maybe once every two or three months on average. I
usually tell them they should either
Wired has recently published an article about how the FBI claims to have
found Silk Road's server:
http://www.wired.com/2014/09/the-fbi-finally-says-how-it-legally-pinpointed-silk-roads-server/
The FBI claims:
"As they typed 'miscellaneous' strings of characters into the login
page's entry fiel
Okay, that's what I assumed, just wanted some feedback to be sure. I apologize
for the inconvenience caused by posting to both mailinglist.
Original Message
From: Mirimir
Apparently from: tor-talk-boun...@lists.torproject.org
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [to
Hi. As you may already know, NTP doesn't work over Tor and even if it
did its untrusted and unauthenticated design leaves systems open to
clock skew attacks that could unmask hidden services. What are your
thoughts on having an anonymity distro, that Torrifies all traffic,
depend on Hidden Serv
On 09/10/2014 03:07 PM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're not machines, and this is not a commercial product where you can
> expect immediate support, sorry. It is quite unfriendly to crosspost
> questions to other mailinglists of the project.
>
> On 09/10/2014 03:47 PM, ter...@safe-mail.net wr
Hi,
We're not machines, and this is not a commercial product where you can
expect immediate support, sorry. It is quite unfriendly to crosspost
questions to other mailinglists of the project.
On 09/10/2014 03:47 PM, ter...@safe-mail.net wrote:
> I'd like to know if HTTP CGI forms and CGI server s
krishna e bera wrote:
>Would it be better to have a separate firewall appliance to ensure the
>hidden service box cannot be as easily DDoS'd or exploited?
No, this can be done very effectively with software firewalls. Though some
people are doing more with authenticated hidden services. Some p
On 09/09/2014 10:26 PM, Griffin Boyce wrote:
> Things that are important to note for hidden service operators:
> - Firewall rules are really useful for keeping out unwarranted scrutiny.
It's also good to have server and tor process in separate machines, or
at least in separate VMs, and to con
Hi,
I'd like to know if HTTP CGI forms and CGI server side programs on a hidden
service work the same over Tor as over regular the internet. For example using
the Apache HTTP server.
Thanks
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
h
With the TestSocks setting I get
Sep 10 15:34:24.000 [notice] Your application (using socks5 to port 443) instruc
Sep 10 15:34:47.000 [notice] Your application (using socks5 to port 443) instruc
in the log file. However, in the torrc file I have
ORPort 9001
not 443.
I don't know if that is anyth
Tor Weekly News September 10th, 2014
Welcome to the thirty-sixth issue in 2014 of Tor Weekly News, the weekly
newsle
On 14-09-10 12:26 AM, Griffin Boyce wrote:
> Things that are important to note for hidden service operators:
> - Firewall rules are really useful for keeping out unwarranted scrutiny.
Would it be better to have a separate firewall appliance to ensure the
hidden service box cannot be as easily DD
Hi Georg,
What width/height do you see if you
1) download and verify the latest release Tor Browser (3.6.5)
2) start it
3) (without doing anything to the window) go to browserspy.dk/screen.php?
100x900
--
Viele Grüße,
Hartmut
Hungerhilfe: http://www.thehungersite.com
Ohne Zensur suchen:
http
I've tried connecting with "Tor/Privacy (SOCKS5)" but still get the
same error =(
"From the Tor side" do you mean on the server side or something else?
2014-09-10 13:43 GMT+02:00 Roger Dingledine :
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 01:28:15PM +0200, Perforin wrote:
>> HI That's because the DNS requests ar
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 01:28:15PM +0200, Perforin wrote:
> HI That's because the DNS requests are not made through Tor, so Pidgin
> can't resolv the hidden service onion URL. You need Polipo or Privoxy
> running, configure it with tunneling everything through Tor (don't
> forget the DNS requests!!
HI That's because the DNS requests are not made through Tor, so Pidgin
can't resolv the hidden service onion URL. You need Polipo or Privoxy
running, configure it with tunneling everything through Tor (don't
forget the DNS requests!!!). Lastly you need to configure pidgin to use
the local privoxy/p
I've been trying to connect to a hidden IRC server using Pidgin and irssi.
I can connect using
torify irssi
or
torify pidgin
then connecting to the server, but setting up a direct connection
through socks5 and proxy settings fails with the error message
"connection refused".
The torrc on the serv
> apparently all pedos are windoz-users
Odd. I'd think if anything pedos would "think different".
-V
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
18 matches
Mail list logo
