Tim Retout wrote:
I'm still watching it, but it seems relatively balanced, and features
interviews with Bruce Schneier, Jacob Applebaum, Julian Assange, Tim
Berners-Lee and so on.
(And Horizon had average viewing figures of around 1.7 million people
in 2013, according to the internet, so that me
我们感谢你
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
On 09/04/2014 12:23 AM, Tim Retout wrote:
> Hi!
>
> If you can access BBC iPlayer, you might be interested in tonight's
> Horizon episode on issues related to Tor:
>
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04grp09
>
> I'm still watching it, but it seems relatively balanced, and features
> interview
On 09/04/2014 12:23 AM, Tim Retout wrote:
> Hi!
>
> If you can access BBC iPlayer, you might be interested in tonight's
> Horizon episode on issues related to Tor:
>
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04grp09
>
> I'm still watching it, but it seems relatively balanced, and features
> interview
On 14-09-03 10:25 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 04:10:13PM -0700, Virgil Griffith wrote:
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SaBK664SchhZOP9XBsB8KK63k4xlmMTlkhfF28f2204/pub
> [...]
> - Figure 3 is a bit weird. Our bandwidth-per-relay stat is a function of
> how many total
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 04:10:13PM -0700, Virgil Griffith wrote:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SaBK664SchhZOP9XBsB8KK63k4xlmMTlkhfF28f2204/pub
Hi Virgil,
Neat analysis!
I think putting this up on the Tor blog, once it settles a bit, is a
fine plan.
You might also want to put it together
On 09/03/2014 08:50 AM, spriver wrote:
> Hi,
> is there any possibility to divide up each TCP connection into a single
> tor circuit? What would be the effect on the usability of Tor?
>
> Or is it a complete nonsense?
>
> Cheers
>
> spriver
Check out these options in the Tor manual:
IsolateCli
The question was whether any users need Tor on Mac OS 10.6, and I made the case
for the users of a new system we are about to announce. Also, all we really
want is the tor executable, not the browser component, but we want it to be
signed by the Tor Project (or an equally trustworthy authority)
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SaBK664SchhZOP9XBsB8KK63k4xlmMTlkhfF28f2204/pub
I shared some of these with Griffin at USENIX, but I figured it was time to
share with the larger Tor community. I'd like to make this a post on Tor
blog if someone can hook me up with that.
I still consider this
If I'm on the Tails list because I'm disseminating Tails why aren't I being
told to replace the old with the new version before this?
Robert
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listi
harmony:
> On 2014-09-03 14:57, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> >Tor Weekly News, September 3rd, 2014 - mentions Tor Browser 3.6.5 and
> >4.0-alpha-2 are out.
> >
> >But the download site
> >https://www.torproject.org/projects/torbrowser.html has only 3.6.4. &
> >4.0-alpha-1.
>
> After members of the Tor Bro
Hi!
If you can access BBC iPlayer, you might be interested in tonight's
Horizon episode on issues related to Tor:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04grp09
I'm still watching it, but it seems relatively balanced, and features
interviews with Bruce Schneier, Jacob Applebaum, Julian Assange, Tim
Be
if you're releasing a paid product which depends on torbrowser running on 10.6,
are you willing to donate for 10.6 support maintenance?
as a developer you might be aware of the caveats when supporting 32 and 64 bit
versions. apart from not having to write hundreds of #ifdefs, testing 50% less
c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
OK, i did not assume that you did not setup the stanzas at all.
Have a nice service.
Greetings
On 03. September 2014 11:32:35 MESZ, Martin S wrote:
>Finally, I found the source of my incompetence now it works.
>Problem was in the torrc file: it la
The Tor Store hasn't been updated with the new design.
www.printfection.com/torprojectstore
If the onion-circuit-board shirts were available from there, I would buy
them.
-V
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torp
On 9/3/2014 10:22 AM, harmony wrote:
On 2014-09-03 14:57, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
Tor Weekly News, September 3rd, 2014 - mentions Tor Browser 3.6.5 and
4.0-alpha-2 are out.
But the download site
https://www.torproject.org/projects/torbrowser.html has only 3.6.4. &
4.0-alpha-1.
After members of the
On 03 Sep 2014, at 17:08, Tor Talker wrote:
> [Short answer]
> As an individual user, I don't need Tor on Mac OS 10.6, but as a developer of
> a soon to be released Tor-dependent project I would like to see support
> continue.
>
> [Long answer]
> We are developing a system called HideMeta tha
On 2014-09-03 14:57, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
Tor Weekly News, September 3rd, 2014 - mentions Tor Browser 3.6.5 and
4.0-alpha-2 are out.
But the download site
https://www.torproject.org/projects/torbrowser.html has only 3.6.4. &
4.0-alpha-1.
After members of the Tor Browser team confirmed yesterday
[Short answer]
As an individual user, I don't need Tor on Mac OS 10.6, but as a developer of a
soon to be released Tor-dependent project I would like to see support continue.
[Long answer]
We are developing a system called HideMeta that relies on Tor and other proven
security components to encry
Tor Weekly News, September 3rd, 2014 - mentions Tor Browser 3.6.5 and
4.0-alpha-2 are out.
But the download site https://www.torproject.org/projects/torbrowser.html has only
3.6.4. & 4.0-alpha-1.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings g
Hi,
is there any possibility to divide up each TCP connection into a single
tor circuit? What would be the effect on the usability of Tor?
Or is it a complete nonsense?
Cheers
spriver
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https:
Tor Weekly News September 3rd, 2014
Welcome to the thirty-fifth issue of Tor Weekly News in 2014, the weekly
newsle
On 14-09-03 05:46 AM, bao song wrote:
> 10.6 still supports Rosetta to run old apps.
>
> 10.7 means having to upgrade EVERYTHING.
>
> That's why I still run 10.6
>
> (and there was even more to be said for 10.4 which ran pre-OSX apps, but my
> 10.4 machine died).
Do these old apps need to be c
Hey!
On 03 Sep 2014, at 06:21, Mike Perry wrote:
> Mac OS 10.6 has been end-of-life
> Moreover dropping 10.6 support would mean that we could ship 64bit-only
> binaries for Mac
[…]
> Moreover, these 64bit binaries could be hardened with
> 10.7+ hardening options.
That would first mean to provide
10.6 still supports Rosetta to run old apps.
10.7 means having to upgrade EVERYTHING.
That's why I still run 10.6
(and there was even more to be said for 10.4 which ran pre-OSX apps, but my
10.4 machine died).
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproj
Finally, I found the source of my incompetence now it works.
Problem was in the torrc file: it lacked a HiddenServicePort stanza
for the service. . =/
Adding it, restarting the tor and service and now it is up and
accessible for the world at large.
Thanks for your time though =)
/Martin S
2
26 matches
Mail list logo
