Hello lovely humans,
[resending this email to the broader community, sorry if you got this
email twice. Also, thanks to those who helped with updating the pad :]
If your username is listed below, it means you've committed to
Torproject website for at least once, and I don't have your git name and
On 8/31/14, Griffin Boyce wrote:
> krishna e bera wrote:
>>There are several pseudonymous development sponsors (named only by
>>single letters). Any of them could be GCHQ or NSA or one of their
>>front
>>agencies.
>>It doesnt matter - all of the code remains open source and the
>>developers have
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 06:47:57PM +0300, s7r wrote:
> Anyone can explain what this warnings are and if they are reason for
> concern?
>
> [warn] Unexpected onionskin length after decryption: 58
A relay operator on #tor irc channel also reported seeing these (unless
that was you). It's harmless -
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 12:28:06AM +0200, Aymeric Vitte wrote:
> Two is probably enough, assuming the first one does not know it is
> the first one, ie is not triggered by a CREATE_FAST request.
No, I don't think this makes sense. It doesn't matter if the first
hop knows it's first. It only matter
Two is probably enough, assuming the first one does not know it is the
first one, ie is not triggered by a CREATE_FAST request.
Le 29/08/2014 09:55, John Doe a écrit :
Surely this is not as simple as that which you said. Why have even a middle
node if it is only the first and last nodes that c
krishna e bera wrote:
>There are several pseudonymous development sponsors (named only by
>single letters). Any of them could be GCHQ or NSA or one of their
>front
>agencies.
>It doesnt matter - all of the code remains open source and the
>developers have their own public reputation to maintain
On 14-08-30 07:31 AM, Patrick Schleizer wrote:
> Cypher:
>> On 08/24/2014 09:43 PM, Michael Wolf wrote:
>> The article was very interesting - except the part about 'here's how you
>> might want to fix this'. I certainly hope that the Tor project /is not/
>> accepting patches submitted by NSA or GCH
On 14-08-30 02:31 AM, elrippo wrote:
> Very nice :)
>
> My browser, rekonq, reports that your certificate is not valid. Maybe you
> check
> that.
>
> Kind regards,
> elrippo
>
> Am Samstag, 30. August 2014, 02:28:22 schrieb Juris - torservers.net:
>> Update:
>>
>> https://www.torservers.net/wi
How to get the latest Tor .deb file when the key is expired then?
> Wait until weasel fixes it.
>
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/12994
>
> ---
> GPG/PGP Fingerprint
> E129 722B A512 105C E8BE
> 4705 8046 EA48 2C82 1339
> https://arlen.io/key
> On Aug 30, 2014 7:38 AM, "Anonymous
Wait until weasel fixes it.
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/12994
---
GPG/PGP Fingerprint
E129 722B A512 105C E8BE
4705 8046 EA48 2C82 1339
https://arlen.io/key
On Aug 30, 2014 7:38 AM, "Anonymous12" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How to fix my issue?
>
> The error:
> W: GPG error: http://deb
Hi,
How to fix my issue?
The error:
W: GPG error: http://deb.torproject.org trusty InRelease: The following
signatures were invalid: KEYEXPIRED 1409325681
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/
Cypher:
> On 08/24/2014 09:43 PM, Michael Wolf wrote:
> The article was very interesting - except the part about 'here's how you
> might want to fix this'. I certainly hope that the Tor project /is not/
> accepting patches submitted by NSA or GCHQ! Sure, I realize those
> agencies could very easily
12 matches
Mail list logo
