Why do you think they belong to different groups? It's absolutely not
obvious if the colorization is removed. All of your "groups" have a
preceding slope indicating that something started before your limits,
and they seem to be normal variations of a general down slope that
started in 2013.
On Fri
2014-08-07 22:06 GMT+07:00, mick :
> This is worrying.
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/08/07/london_cops_close_down_site_arrest_suspect/
>
> If this reporting is accurate, it implies that UK City of London Police
> may be co-operating with copyright enforcers in closing down a service
> which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
For those aware of my history, I have been informed of the case and
working on it with some contacts and will be in touch with the parties
concerned to arrange some connections on the affair.
(Just needed to send this out as I've had 9 emails about it
Patrick Schleizer transcribed 2.2K bytes:
> isis:
> > This should be fixed (for Linux) in an upcoming Tor Browser 4.0 release.
> > I've
> > added these things to the `start-tor-browser` script. There are:
> >
> > - Instructions for use, including additional Firefox preferences that
> >
I've been looking through the various historical data from
metrics.torproject.org.
If you plot the 'used bandwidth' divided by the 'advertised bandwidth'
(meant to be a rough measure of network congestion), you get three distinct
groups, seen here:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3308162/three_groups.png
On 8/7/2014 12:57 PM, Mirimir wrote:
On 08/07/2014 11:20 AM,
bm-2ctjsegdfzqngqwuqjswro6jrwlc9b3...@bitmessage.ch wrote:
The automated messages from Craiglist appear like this:
This IP has been automatically blocked. If you have questions, please
email: blocks-b1406984946068...@craigslist.org
On 8/7/2014 2:41 PM, RD wrote:
Hello Joe,Thursday, August 7, 2014, 12:38:51 AM, you wrote:
Because, the displayed name or even URL in the email body may be
*completely* different from the actual URL in the message header
(message source) that opens, once clicked.
In my example, I needed to se
Hello Joe,Thursday, August 7, 2014, 12:38:51 AM, you wrote:
> Because, the displayed name or even URL in the email body may be
> *completely* different from the actual URL in the message header
> (message source) that opens, once clicked.
In my example, I needed to see a link to click. I did f
On 08/07/2014 11:47 AM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> But it also appeared that providing means to access sites that were
> "banned," was also classed as a *criminal* offense.
> I'm not sure that one would hold up in the highest courts of various
> countries.
> "We told you not to go to that site - now y
Craigslist was slowing down anyone with a tor IP, though it appears
they may be blocking the majority now.
The automated messages from Craiglist appear like this:
This IP has been automatically blocked. If you have questions, please
email: blocks-b1406984946068...@craigslist.org
A template f
On 08/07/2014 11:20 AM,
bm-2ctjsegdfzqngqwuqjswro6jrwlc9b3...@bitmessage.ch wrote:
> Craigslist was slowing down anyone with a tor IP, though it appears
> they may be blocking the majority now.
>
>
>
> The automated messages from Craiglist appear like this:
>
> This IP has been automatically bl
On 8/7/2014 10:21 AM, krishna e bera wrote:
On 14-08-07 11:06 AM, mick wrote:
This is worrying.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/08/07/london_cops_close_down_site_arrest_suspect/
If this reporting is accurate, it implies that UK City of London Police
may be co-operating with copyright enforce
On 08/07/2014 03:57 AM, Andreas Krey wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Aug 2014 23:38:54 +, Yuri wrote:
> ...
>> So what is the reason that UDP isn't supported?
>
> Because what you describe is a transparent proxy/router, while tor
> only offers a SOCKS5 interface and doesn't (and doesn't want to)
> care
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Patrick Schleizer:
> Has this bug been reported upstream against the Linux kernel on
> kernel.org?
What is the current state on this bug? Has it been reported? Has it
been fixed?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJT46tGAAoJEDcK3SCCSvoeKW
Hello tor-talk list!
I need a help from you guys!
I took the initiative to create a dynamic flow chart with information about
applications and Tor scripts. I searched the internet for a site where ALL
show the programs that make up the core of Tor. Unfortunately I found
little centralized
informa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I'm having the same issue [1] in a slightly different setup (remote
SOCKSPort).
Patrick Schleizer:
> This happens because of missing Tor ControlPort access.
Interesting. TBB doesn't show this warning when used in transparent
torification mode (in w
On 14-08-07 11:06 AM, mick wrote:
> This is worrying.
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/08/07/london_cops_close_down_site_arrest_suspect/
>
> If this reporting is accurate, it implies that UK City of London Police
> may be co-operating with copyright enforcers in closing down a service
> whic
This is worrying.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/08/07/london_cops_close_down_site_arrest_suspect/
If this reporting is accurate, it implies that UK City of London Police
may be co-operating with copyright enforcers in closing down a service
which bypasses an ISP filter.
A logical extension
RD:
> Hello Tor,
>
> Despite my check-marking 'Make Tor Browser the Default browser', wherever
> I click on a link from an email regular Firefox opens up.
>
> How do I make Tor Browser always be the default?
>
> thanks
>
Hi,
if this about Linux or Windows?
If it is about Linux...
We're usin
isis:
> This should be fixed (for Linux) in an upcoming Tor Browser 4.0 release. I've
> added these things to the `start-tor-browser` script. There are:
>
> - Instructions for use, including additional Firefox preferences that
> you'll need to set (to tell Tor Button where your ControlPo
On 14-08-07 05:57 AM, Andreas Krey wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Aug 2014 23:38:54 +, Yuri wrote:
> ...
>> So what is the reason that UDP isn't supported?
>
> Because what you describe is a transparent proxy/router, while tor
> only offers a SOCKS5 interface and doesn't (and doesn't want to)
> care abou
With .onion addresses, provided you know you have the correct address,
you can also be sure there's no TLS MITM going on, whereas https://.com
relies on the CA system.
In addition, .onion addresses are censorship-resistant -- require the
private key to mess with, instead of leaning on / social eng
On Wed, 06 Aug 2014 23:38:54 +, Yuri wrote:
...
> So what is the reason that UDP isn't supported?
Because what you describe is a transparent proxy/router, while tor
only offers a SOCKS5 interface and doesn't (and doesn't want to)
care about either TCP or UDP packet capture.
Andreas
--
"Tota
RD:
> Hello Tor,
>
> Despite my check-marking 'Make Tor Browser the Default browser', wherever
> I click on a link from an email regular Firefox opens up.
>
> How do I make Tor Browser always be the default?
There are (currently) issues with this idea:
https://bugs.torproject.org/12763
Georg
On 07/08/14 01:06, Mirimir wrote:
> On 08/06/2014 04:43 PM, Virgil Griffith wrote:
>> I have a question on the exported data from metrics.torproject.org.
>>
>> When downloading the "bandwidth" data as a CSV from:
>> https://metrics.torproject.org/bandwidth.html
>>
>> I've been unable to determine t
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/12821
shm...@riseup.net wrote:
> im a little concerned about the following and still trying to figure it out:
>
> if multiple parties are using torbirdy with thunderbird and lets say
> some domain owners have dmarc setup with reporting enabled
>
>
26 matches
Mail list logo
