On 07/28/2014 02:35 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 11:58:07PM +0200, CJ wrote:
>> Oh, well, just got another name right now, I think it will also make
>> some smiles: orWall. Maybe with a "84" on its logo?
>> Just to be sure, nothing against this one I hope, if we put aside
Mirimir transcribed 2.8K bytes:
> On 07/24/2014 08:38 PM, Matthew Finkel wrote:
>
>
>
> > Another distribution method is currently being written and we will
> > write others in the future, but please help us provide another way
> > (yes, you, please help us if the current situation is unsatisfac
Eben's emails get rejected from at least one of these lists. If there
is a whitelist facility, his email addy ought definitely be on it.
On 7/28/14, Eben Moglen wrote:
> Yes, but please be careful that people don't rely on the conversation
> as legal advice. That should be printed in the footer
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 11:58:07PM +0200, CJ wrote:
> Oh, well, just got another name right now, I think it will also make
>some smiles: orWall. Maybe with a "84" on its logo?
> Just to be sure, nothing against this one I hope, if we put aside the
>politics? I'm not US???
Sounds good to me!
Thank
isis transcribed 4.9K bytes:
> CJ transcribed 2.5K bytes:
> >
> > On 07/24/2014 03:54 PM, u wrote:
> > > CJ:
> > >> On 07/24/2014 01:23 PM, u wrote:
> > >>> Lunar:
> > CJ:
> > > Just a small announce (not sure if this is the right ML, sorry).
> > > I'm developing an Android app allowi
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 02:09:12PM +1000, shm...@riseup.net wrote 0.3K bytes in
0 lines about:
: are there any stats available to see the % of people who verify their
: tbb download (cross ref same IP for both the .xz and .asc or shasum txt
: file ???) as a % of total tbb downloads ?
Here's a rou
CJ transcribed 6.4K bytes:
>
> On 07/26/2014 03:36 AM, Mike Perry wrote:
> > CJ:
> >> On 07/25/2014 09:24 AM, isis wrote:
> >>> CJ transcribed 2.5K bytes:
> On 07/24/2014 03:54 PM, u wrote:
> > CJ:
> >> On 07/24/2014 01:23 PM, u wrote:
> >>> Lunar:
> CJ:
> > Just
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 08:08:23PM -0300, Juan wrote:
> So, the great defenders of 'free speech' and one would think
> free/open software, are now claiming to own the combination
> of letters "tor" and want to control any 'trademark' which
> contains that word?
Yes, when
krishna e bera transcribed 3.9K bytes:
> thanks for all your efforts!
<3
> ps did you just trash 3 bridges by publishing them on trac?
> ;)
>
Nope. Last I checked, 10.0.0.0/8 isn't publicly routable. I manually sanitised
those lines. :)
--
♥Ⓐ isis agora lovecruft
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 15:34:58 -0400
Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 07:43:17PM +0200, CJ wrote:
> > Name / legal:
> > for now, I didn't get any answer from Andrew Lewman, who kindly
> > contacted me???
> > I added mentions so that it's clear torrific isn't from Tor Project.
> > M
Matthew Finkel transcribed 5.0K bytes:
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 02:09:52AM -0400, The Caped Wonderwoman wrote:
> > The difficulty of obtaining a Riseup account may be prohibitive for a lot
> > of people, especially if they need a bridge quickly for whatever
> > reason. Anecdotally, I requested one
Hello Roger,
Oh, well, just got another name right now, I think it will also make some
smiles: orWall. Maybe with a "84" on its logo?
This should close the "naming discussion" I guess. Though US people may want to
argue because it's, also, the name of a democrat politic (just checked on
duck).
shm...@riseup.net:
> are there any stats available to see the % of people who verify their
> tbb download (cross ref same IP for both the .xz and .asc or shasum txt
> file ???) as a % of total tbb downloads ?
would you have any suggestions on how to gather such stats?
--
Lunar
> I would like to know if it's necessary to
> install or configure a web proxy (privoxy or polipo) with Tor Browser
> Bundle 3.6.3 in order to have more privacy or to prevent Dns leaks.
No, this is not necessary.
> Orbot
> (a software for Android) includes Polipo, but I don't see it in Tor
>
Mirimir transcribed 1.1K bytes:
> On 07/25/2014 11:31 PM, grarpamp wrote:
>
>
>
> > Do we underestimate the social net in oppressed that gives
> > them awareness of tor, and to obtain binary and share bridge
> > info in the first place?
>
> Maybe we do. But what about carelessness, poor judgme
grarpamp transcribed 1.2K bytes:
> This thread talk of only gmail and yahoo, but i also believe
> outlook (hotmail) will no longer create usable accounts [1]
> (ie not via tor, but perhaps via clearnet?) without requiring
> phone. [Truly you mean to say 'phone' tech when you say
> prevent multiple
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 07:43:17PM +0200, CJ wrote:
> Name / legal:
> for now, I didn't get any answer from Andrew Lewman, who kindly
> contacted me???
> I added mentions so that it's clear torrific isn't from Tor Project.
> Maybe that's enough ??? as I don't get answer, I stick with it. We will
>
On 07/24/2014 08:01 AM, CJ wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just a small announce (not sure if this is the right ML, sorry).
> I'm developing an Android app allowing to block all IP traffic, and
> force only selected app through Orbot.
> This is done because neither Orbot nor AFWall (or other free, opensource
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 02:09:52AM -0400, The Caped Wonderwoman wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> The difficulty of obtaining a Riseup account may be prohibitive for a lot of
> people, especially if they need a bridge quickly for whatever reason.
> Anecdotally, I req
Thanks Sebastian G! I don't watch much Youtube, but blocked YouTube is a
great example! Thank you!! Uploads is also another great use case.
If porn isn't a sufficiently canon use-case, while behind Tor, I personally
find it difficult to enjoy the video content on NYTimes or the Washington
Post'
On 7/27/2014 2:08 AM, grarpamp wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
How do some more advanced Tor users feel about pros & cons of leaving java
script constantly enabled or selectively enabling it?
The risk of any potential leak of real IP or actual user data
(not just met
On 7/26/2014 10:13 PM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
On 07/26/2014 09:26 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
So, is it, "damned if I do, damned if I don't?"
Basically, yes. A lot of users including me can cope with only
selectively enabling Javascript, but I would strongly argue against
making that the default. It is
Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> you're effectively forced into either
> * disabling js completely
Few people do that, so it may in principle shrink your anonymity set
more than JS-enabled fingerprinting does.
> Seems we must make a choice: Whether more concerned about "some"
> sites detecting JS is DISabl
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> How do some more advanced Tor users feel about pros & cons of leaving java
> script constantly enabled or selectively enabling it?
The risk of any potential leak of real IP or actual user data
(not just meta browser environment data) is overri
Am 27.07.2014 um 04:14 Virgil Griffith:
> I am compiling a list of use cases that Tor's current slowness makes
> impossible/unpleasant. Roger once said, "Whatever you use Tor for someone
> will use it for something else."
>
> So with this in mind I'm asking you all for things you (or others) woul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
And predictably, five minutes after I send that message, I find the
confirmation in the other account's spam trap. Apologies for that.
On July 27, 2014 2:09:52 AM EDT, The Caped Wonderwoman
wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA512
> * Hidden Services
> Wiki and TorChan come to mind.
These have always worked perfectly fine.
> * Streaming video/porn -- I can imagine people in many jurisdictions
Low bandwidth video from a good codec is not intolerable, and
reinforces good old fashioned content is more important than
needless
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
The difficulty of obtaining a Riseup account may be prohibitive for a lot of
people, especially if they need a bridge quickly for whatever reason.
Anecdotally, I requested one under a different identity over a week ago and
have yet to hear back. I
> Juan scrit...
>I doubt it. That's not how the maffia operates.
Maffia are solely responsible for their image. What better
way to repair it.
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 9:43 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> cases
I said applied / best practices... ok, even if that includes hypothetical
cases d
29 matches
Mail list logo
