> => We do not deal with an American "NSA problem". We deal with a
> worldwide surveillance problem!
+1
But probably, we should put it this way:
Not only, but also ...
Politcally, we should aim to break the circuit between the secret
services which works following the principal: I do regard yo
On 7/7/14, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> On 7/6/2014 3:39 PM, C B wrote:
>> Not as many live here as vacation here. A very large number of the rich
>> and powerful visit. And as the first in the nation primary, every
>> Presidential candidate spends a lot of time here. Yes it is often hard to
>> get laws a
Last night I noticed my relay path was using two PPTOR relays. I don't know
much about Tor but from what I've read I thought servers that are related
are supposed to identify themselves as such. Just because two servers have
similar names does not mean they are related though. Are those servers all
It is easier to do things here because it is a small state. There are certainly
more rich and famous in say California and New York, but New York could
increase its liberty rating by 30% and still be worst in the country. New
Hampshire has the largest state legislative body in the country, and p
On 7/6/2014 3:39 PM, C B wrote:
Not as many live here as vacation here. A very large number of the rich and
powerful visit. And as the first in the nation primary, every Presidential
candidate spends a lot of time here. Yes it is often hard to get laws against
things because politicians do not
Not as many live here as vacation here. A very large number of the rich and
powerful visit. And as the first in the nation primary, every Presidential
candidate spends a lot of time here. Yes it is often hard to get laws against
things because politicians do not want to get caught. We recently o
"the
rules used by the NSA to figure out who is worthy of being watched.
Among the trip wires are interests in Tor, ... and Tails".
http://reason.com/blog/2014/07/06/if-youre-reading-reasoncom-the-nsa-is-pr
--
Christopher Booth
From: Joe Btfsplk
To: tor-talk
When I tried to reach debs from torproject's server, I got this:
http://deb.torproject.org/torproject.org/dists/Torproject/main/binary-amd64/Packages，404
Not Found [IP: 82.195.75.101 80]
http://deb.torproject.org/torproject.org/dists/Torproject/main/binary-i386/Packages，404
Not Found [IP: 82.195
Looks like you have "Torproject" instead of your distro name. This should
be "lucid" or whatever is the name of your distro.
https://www.torproject.org/docs/debian.html.en
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 3:36 PM, ttzeqq wrote:
> When I tried to reach debs from torproject's server, I got this:
>
> http:/
On 7/6/2014 1:27 PM, C B wrote:
Obviously, we do need to anonymize and encrypt everything, but also need to
adopt a UN resolution protecting the privacy of individuals - no government may
intercept any communication without permission or a signed search warrant,
which can only be issued on pr
Obviously, we do need to anonymize and encrypt everything, but also need to
adopt a UN resolution protecting the privacy of individuals - no government may
intercept any communication without permission or a signed search warrant,
which can only be issued on probable cause, and which must specif
If the google translation of the document at:
http://www.heise.de/ct/heft/2013-20--2248651.html is mostly accurate (if
not grammatically correct), this seems an odd statement:
"Overall, the probability that your privacy is sacrificed as collateral
damage increases by the use of Tor significantly
Google translation:
Jürgen Schmidt
Own-goal
Dangers of Tor usage in daily life
In the current debate one often hears the Council, for more privacy and
security, one should use the Tor anonymity service. In fact, however, this is a
very dangerous tip. For normal users, it increases de facto the r
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 7:11 PM, coderman wrote:
> ...
> a regexp rule like:
> '''
> extractors: {{
> bridges[] =
> /bridge\s([0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}):?([0-9]{2,4}?[^0-9])/;
> }}
> '''
> is both written by a novice regexp'er, and also took them a bit of
> time. more tha
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 7:30 PM, coderman wrote:
> ...
> the code do not point toward this being a non-fictitious example,
i meant "non-functional, fictitious example" of course. and with
that, i will leave my further comments to a later, more sober date...
airport security, here i come!
:P
the theme of messing with XKeyScore is amusing[0], but more to the
point i was asked to respond to some concerns of authenticity made in
a different post:
"Validating XKeyScore code"
http://blog.erratasec.com/2014/07/validating-xkeyscore-code.html
i'm trying to keep this feedback technical, as i
On 07/06/2014 06:17 PM, no.thing_to-h...@cryptopathie.eu wrote:
> Correctly, the BND. (1)(2) From 2004 to 2007 an unknown amount of raw
> internet and telephone traffic was forwarded directly to the NSA, only
> the data from Germans was filtered. (3) This measure was stopped
> because our respected
Thanks. I've not used online translating sites for larger documents or
whole websites. For this document, I tried a few other well known
translators besides google translate - in an attempt to avoid anything
"google."
Are there online translators that work for larger documents besides
google
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks Cristopher.
Same situation here in old Europe. I am German, and our surveillance
service BND (= Bundesnachrichtendienst) does exactly the same. In
Frankfurt we have got the world's biggest internet-hub, the DE-CIX
(Continental Europe, Eastern-Eu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks for the notice.
The German Heise publisher provides good information to IT-related
topics, but in German. I tried my Google-translate-link just before,
and it worked via Tor, perhaps you could switch the exit? Anyway, here
ist the original link:
To "no.thing_to-hide" -
the link you provided is inaccessible for me.
It gives a message: "This page was not retrieved from its original
location over a secure connection."
Not sure if there's a way around it, or maybe provide the original page
& let people translate it themselves?
On 7/4/2014
2014-07-06 16:50 GMT+02:00 C B :
> All persons, "foreigners" and "Americans" have the same right to privacy,
> and it is a crime for the NSA to be collecting Internet traffic from
> everyone.
Thanks from The Netherlands
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or
And yet countless times we were lied to and said no there is no way to read
any of the e-mail messages - only meta data is being collected, there is no
"button" to press to see the message. What a lie. There is no button, because
everything is being collected.
As an American I would like to se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Quote from SIGINT Raw data:
"Im putting all my pride aside just to say that i will miss you dearly
and your the only person that i really allowed myself to get close to
after losing my ex husband, my dad and my brother.. Im glad it was so
easy for you
24 matches
Mail list logo
