On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 6:45 AM, nb.linux wrote:
>... I use Ada only for a short time. But I don't
> want to use C (or C++ or Java) again, because a paradigm of "everything
> is an integer" simply seems not appropriate to me in this millennium.
old C: int*
modern C++: std::vector move constructo
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 1:26 AM, Stevens Le Blond wrote:
>...
> We are a team of researchers working on the design and implementation of
> a traffic-analysis resistant anonymity network...
is this an implementation of existing research, or experimentation
with novel architectures? tell us more :
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 18:42:09 + (UTC)
Артур Истомин wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 01:45:16PM +, antispa...@sent.at wrote:
> > In his announcement, arma noted it would be a good idea to stay away
> > from the Internet. Is it ok?
>
> Yeah, let's go to FIDO! :)
>
> The more you wait (wit
[Replying to Stevens and tor-talk only. Crossposting runs against my
religious beliefs.]
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 4:26 AM, Stevens Le Blond wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> We are a team of researchers working on the design and implementation of
> a traffic-analysis resistant anonymity network and we would l
OCaml. http://ocaml.org/
1. OCaml is more obscure than many languages, but it supports
programming in imperative, object-oriented, and functional
styles (though it's obviously best suited for a functional
style). I've seen people write Java in OCaml and produce clean,
Gareth Owen:
> Does tor do any form of time synchronisation?
No. See also:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/8170
Cheers,
Patrick
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/lis
Stevens Le Blond:
> Hello,
>
> We are a team of researchers working on the design and implementation of
> a traffic-analysis resistant anonymity network and we would like to
> request your opinion regarding the choice of a programming language /
> environment. Here are the criteria:
Hi,
(disclai
>I'm a bit of a newb at this (all of it). But this email thread
>(tor-talk) is completely unencrypted, right? And it has to be that
>way?
You can see this thread securely using lynx with this URL:
snews://news.gmane.org:563/cacykwb0hzfvsa_k_a6dp4-ppoacjonn+htntlbvxymmrpon...@mail.gmail.com
Ir
Redefining anything in js is visible as "your nose on your face", as
well as importing silently anything, whatever obfuscation/minification
means are used it's trivial to check.
But here you do not have necessarly to import things and/or libraries,
you can package everything with your app so y
On 18/04/14 11:30, Aymeric Vitte wrote:
[...]
> - nodejs is easy to audit (assuming that modules like V8 can be
> audited), you can override node's functions/objects if you like
[...]
Actually, in my mind, that's one point against safety of Node.js
applications. Redefining, say, Array.prototype.fo
Without any hesitation: js + nodejs (note: I am not part of the node's team)
- the code is very reduced and transparent, difficult to backdoor
including nodejs itself
- js is familiar but not trivial as many people think
- works on any platform, can even be browserified (see links below) -->
n
Hello,
We are a team of researchers working on the design and implementation of
a traffic-analysis resistant anonymity network and we would like to
request your opinion regarding the choice of a programming language /
environment. Here are the criteria:
1) Familiarity: The language should be fam
12 matches
Mail list logo
