OK, I will try to write something up as soon as I can.
Let me just clarify some points.
Is the goal to be more secure than a standard Linux distro such as Ubuntu
or Debian? Yes.
Is the goal to be more secure than a distro such as Tails or Liberte? No.
For example, instead of using a patched ver
Bare with me as I ramble my way toward hidden services.
First a plain server connect:
Assuming a simple web client using Tor to contact a normal web page, NOT
HTTPS for simplicity.
Client <=> Node A <=> Node B <=> Node C <-> HTTP Server
Node "C" (exit) sees unencrypted traffic to the server and
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 05:31:31PM -0500, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> On 3/31/2014 4:12 PM, Jann Horn wrote:
> >Well, the subject line pretty much says it all: Lots of Tor relays send out
> >globally sequential IP IDs, which, as far as I know, allows a remote party to
> >measure how fast the relay is send
On 3/31/2014 4:12 PM, Jann Horn wrote:
Well, the subject line pretty much says it all: Lots of Tor relays send out
globally sequential IP IDs, which, as far as I know, allows a remote party to
measure how fast the relay is sending out IP packets with high precision,
possibly making statistical at
Well, the subject line pretty much says it all: Lots of Tor relays send out
globally sequential IP IDs, which, as far as I know, allows a remote party to
measure how fast the relay is sending out IP packets with high precision,
possibly making statistical attacks possible that could e.g. pinpoint t
It's 10.9.2 and I've tried both the GUI and the Terminal app. I can get the
tor binary to run and it completes the bootstrapping process by opening a
circuit. However, running the launcher script gives the following error:
$ Contents/MacOS/TorBrowserBundle --debug
Debug enabled.
Starting Tor Br
Additionally, a popup appears during the debug launch which says "Profile
Missing: Your Firefox profile cannot be loaded. It may be missing or
inaccessible." That message doesn't appear with the launch via GUI and also
the message about TBB being damaged isn't present with the --debug flag set.
O
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 3:28 PM, lee colleton wrote:
> When I found that it didn't run I deleted it (move to trash, empty trash)
> then downloaded new version and observed same results. Re-downloaded and
> checked signature to be sure. It's a weird problem that I've not seen
> before. This behavio
When I found that it didn't run I deleted it (move to trash, empty trash)
then downloaded new version and observed same results. Re-downloaded and
checked signature to be sure. It's a weird problem that I've not seen
before. This behaviour doesn't affect any other applications on the system.
--lee
grarpamp wrote:
http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2014/03/27/doj-pushes-to-expand-hacking-abilities-against-cyber-criminals
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/03/feds-want-an-expanded-ability-to-hack-criminal-suspects-computers
http://news.slashdot.org/story/14/03/28/0242232/doj-pushes-to-expand-hack
10 matches
Mail list logo
