Re: [tor-talk] Thunderbird and TorBirdy not using SOCKS5?

2013-10-31 Thread Sukhbir Singh
antispa...@sent.at: > I downloaded TorBirdy 0.1.1. Than I installed clean Thunderbird from > PortableApps.com. Made sure nothing is called or installed before > TorBirdy. Than I have set up my account. A few of them actually. Than I > installed some extra extensions. TorBirdy is not used for > lif

Re: [tor-talk] Project Gutenberg

2013-10-31 Thread Mirimir
On 10/31/2013 11:53 AM, Manfred Ackermann wrote: > Hi antispam06. > > I just did it without asking for permission ;-) Same result ... it still > comes out of a Tor IP. > > If someone can offer a STunnel or Proxy on a Non-Tor-IP we just bypath > there counter-measure with our counter-counter-meas

Re: [tor-talk] Fwd: SecureDrop, new whistleblower submission system

2013-10-31 Thread Micah Lee
On 10/31/2013 01:45 PM, mick wrote: > Could you not run tails in a VM using virtualbox on the Macs? > > (I ask because I have no experience of virtualbox on a Mac. I only run > Linux. Tails runs fine on a VM hosted on linux so I see no reason > why it could not run on a VM hosted on OSX.) > > (OT

[tor-talk] Thunderbird and TorBirdy not using SOCKS5?

2013-10-31 Thread antispam06
I downloaded TorBirdy 0.1.1. Than I installed clean Thunderbird from PortableApps.com. Made sure nothing is called or installed before TorBirdy. Than I have set up my account. A few of them actually. Than I installed some extra extensions. TorBirdy is not used for life–theatening situations.

Re: [tor-talk] Project Gutenberg

2013-10-31 Thread antispam06
On 31.10.2013 19:38, Lars Noodén wrote: On 10/31/2013 09:07 PM, antispa...@sent.at wrote: AFAIK you don't need permission for creating a mirror. After all, the works are in the Public Domain. The original works are in the public domain, but the new, electronic editions may not be. But either w

Re: [tor-talk] Project Gutenberg

2013-10-31 Thread Michael Wolf
On 10/31/2013 4:41 PM, Michael Wolf wrote: > On 10/31/2013 3:07 PM, antispa...@sent.at wrote: >> On 31.10.2013 17:53, Manfred Ackermann wrote: >>> I just did it without asking for permission ;-) Same result ... it still >>> comes out of a Tor IP. >> >> AFAIK you don't need permission for creating a

Re: [tor-talk] Project Gutenberg

2013-10-31 Thread Michael Wolf
On 10/31/2013 3:07 PM, antispa...@sent.at wrote: > On 31.10.2013 17:53, Manfred Ackermann wrote: >> I just did it without asking for permission ;-) Same result ... it still >> comes out of a Tor IP. > > AFAIK you don't need permission for creating a mirror. After all, the > works are in the Public

Re: [tor-talk] Fwd: SecureDrop, new whistleblower submission system

2013-10-31 Thread mick
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 21:06:35 +0100 "Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)" allegedly wrote: > At GlobaLeaks we are using too Tails since a couple of years for the > receivers. > However our practical experience is that Tails is a good platform for > journalists only in theory. > That's because most of the jou

Re: [tor-talk] Fwd: SecureDrop, new whistleblower submission system

2013-10-31 Thread Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)
At GlobaLeaks we are using too Tails since a couple of years for the receivers. However our practical experience is that Tails is a good platform for journalists only in theory. That's because most of the journos use an Apple Macbook and Tails is very badly supported on that platform. Btw GlobaLea

Re: [tor-talk] A new check

2013-10-31 Thread Luther Blissett
On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 01:37 +, antispa...@sent.at wrote: > On 29.10.2013 13:39, krishna e bera wrote: > Fast forward after Microsoft has brought Internet to the masses. Some > idiot living an entire life in some basement, with home delivery even > for groceries, tries to tell me about the abr

Re: [tor-talk] Project Gutenberg

2013-10-31 Thread Lars Noodén
On 10/31/2013 09:07 PM, antispa...@sent.at wrote: > AFAIK you don't need permission for creating a mirror. After all, the > works are in the Public Domain. [snip] The original works are in the public domain, but the new, electronic editions may not be. But either way, their issue is with spiderin

Re: [tor-talk] Project Gutenberg

2013-10-31 Thread antispam06
On 31.10.2013 17:53, Manfred Ackermann wrote: I just did it without asking for permission ;-) Same result ... it still comes out of a Tor IP. AFAIK you don't need permission for creating a mirror. After all, the works are in the Public Domain. If someone can offer a STunnel or Proxy on a No

Re: [tor-talk] Project Gutenberg

2013-10-31 Thread Manfred Ackermann
Hi antispam06. I just did it without asking for permission ;-) Same result ... it still comes out of a Tor IP. If someone can offer a STunnel or Proxy on a Non-Tor-IP we just bypath there counter-measure with our counter-counter-measure ;-) http://64l2vhqwbj3mlia7.onion/ebooks/search Greetings,

Re: [tor-talk] Project Gutenberg

2013-10-31 Thread antispam06
On 31.10.2013 13:19, krishna e bera wrote: Would Project Gutenberg accept a Hidden Service mirror site? Can you do it? -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Re: [tor-talk] Tor Double HiddenService w/ Server Level Intercepting Request and Content Anonymization

2013-10-31 Thread Manfred Ackermann
Here we go again ... now the data-center (Hetzner (Germany)) results on "Latency": wget initiated on the same data-center server. Getting 17k in 2 files with an error404-request took directly 0.04 seconds, by proxy 0.1 seconds (reported by wget). Getting 10 times the error404 took directly 13 s

Re: [tor-talk] Project Gutenberg

2013-10-31 Thread mick
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 17:59:39 +1030 DeveloperChris allegedly wrote: > Could exit nodes act as caches. I know that would introduce a number > of issues including a compromised exit node revealing what was > retrieved by that node (but not whom for) so if it was limited to a > few popular 'safe' sit

[tor-talk] Fwd: SecureDrop, new whistleblower submission system

2013-10-31 Thread krishna e bera
Here is an interesting TAILS and Tor-based application and project. TL;DR go to developer site: https://github.com/freedomofpress/securedrop/ Also some off-topic info about whistleblowers and their trials. -- Forwarded message -- From: *Freedom of the Press Foundation* https://pre

Re: [tor-talk] Project Gutenberg

2013-10-31 Thread krishna e bera
Having exit nodes retain information makes them more tempting to seize or compromise. Also, if caches can serve more than one client (which they would have to if reducing bandwidth usage is the goal), it puts them at higher legal risk of copyright infringement prosecution. Would Project Gutenberg

[tor-talk] Fwd: configuring tor on my iphone

2013-10-31 Thread suraj kumar
-- Forwarded message -- From: suraj kumar Date: Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 5:58 AM Subject: configuring tor on my iphone To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org sir i want to know how do i configure tor on my jailbroken iphone if i am already using proxy for using internet. also i have acces

Re: [tor-talk] Tor Double HiddenService w/ Server Level Intercepting Request and Content Anonymization

2013-10-31 Thread Manfred Ackermann
Hi Qingping. So I did some tests on the 'latency'... With my Single-Server-at-Home 8M-ADSL Proof-of-Concept setup it all lasts 3 times longer. Getting 60k in 2 files with an error404-request took directly 4.4 seconds, by proxy 15 seconds. Getting 10 times the error404 took directly 10 seconds, py

Re: [tor-talk] Tor Double HiddenService w/ Server Level Intercepting Request and Content Anonymization

2013-10-31 Thread Manfred Ackermann
Hi Marcos. Just had a look on Whonix. Was new to me and I'll have a look on that, thanks for the info on that. > "Whonix" or "Ubuntu", blocks some unauthorized bad > javascript injection, when visiting a compromised > HiddenService? I have no information that any of those two would block anythin

Re: [tor-talk] Tor Double HiddenService w/ Server Level Intercepting Request and Content Anonymization

2013-10-31 Thread Marcos Eugenio Kehl
Hello folk!"Whonix" or "Ubuntu", blocks some unauthorized bad javascript injection, when visiting a compromised HiddenService? Don't you think HiddenServices are no more secure, after the cataclysm, that happend on August 2013? Do you know when the number of HiddenServices will rise again?Marcos

Re: [tor-talk] Project Gutenberg

2013-10-31 Thread DeveloperChris
Project Gutenberg wouldn't block proxies without good reason. The trouble is without knowing the reason its hard to find a fix. One possible reason hinted in the message is they have bandwidth issues. Which raises an interesting thought. Interesting to me anyway. Could exit nodes act as cac