On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Gordon Morehouse wrote:
> > PGP mails, and I'm thinking about enforcing TLS.
If you enforce TLS, you won't be able to send/receive email for many
domains.
Also REQUIRING PGP will prevent tor users from communicating w/ many people.
http://arstechnica.com/securi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Moritz Bartl:
> On 18.08.2013 19:51, Gordon Morehouse wrote:
This isn't gonna cut it. A Tormail replacement that's any
good, that's reliable, that's censorship-resistant, that's
hardened ... that will require professionals to set it u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
mick:
> On Sun, 18 Aug 2013 10:32:13 -0700 Gordon Morehouse
> allegedly wrote:
>>
>> Your best bet if you *need* an American IP is to use a VPN.
>>
>
> I'm sorry Gordon but I think this needs to be said. On a list
> devoted to tor, recommending a
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
>
> The idea is that you can email @xyz.onion.to, and the mail gateway will
> forward the mail to @xyz.onion. The gateway will only accept PGP mails,
sounds better than average,
> and I'm thinking about enforcing TLS.
this only makes se
On 08/18/2013 09:05 PM, mick wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Aug 2013 10:32:13 -0700 Gordon Morehouse
> allegedly wrote:
>>
>> Your best bet if you *need* an American IP is to use a VPN.
>>
>
> I'm sorry Gordon but I think this needs to be said. On a list
> devoted to tor, recommending a VPN is not ideal.
On 18.08.2013 19:51, Gordon Morehouse wrote:
>>> This isn't gonna cut it. A Tormail replacement that's any good,
>>> that's reliable, that's censorship-resistant, that's hardened ...
>>> that will require professionals to set it up.
I don't want to imply that we are professionals, but we will so
On 18.08.2013 23:27, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> ExitNodes {US}
> StrictNodes 1
The semantics of StrictNodes has changed quite a while ago and was never
intended to be used in this way. It is not only sufficient to just
specify ExitNodes, but enabling StrictNodes will break stuff.
--
Moritz Bartl
htt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 18 Aug 2013 10:32:13 -0700
Gordon Morehouse wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> B Sairafi:
> > Hello
> >
> > I'm using Tor Browser, and I need to be seen by a specific website
> > as if I'm in the US. Is this poss
On Sun, 18 Aug 2013 10:32:13 -0700
Gordon Morehouse allegedly wrote:
>
> Your best bet if you *need* an American IP is to use a VPN.
>
I'm sorry Gordon but I think this needs to be said. On a list devoted
to tor, recommending a VPN is not ideal. Whilst a commercial VPN might
buy you a geo speci
Can't you pick a specific exit node?
---
-ITG (ITechGeek)
i...@itechgeek.com
https://itg.nu/
GPG Keys: https://itg.nu/contact/gpg-key
Preferred GPG Key: Fingerprint: AB46B7E363DA7E04ABFA57852AA9910A DCB1191
Hi,
I'm still trying to understand some of the configuration options. The
documentation says the ORPort statement may occur more than once.
Initially I understood that as a way to open multiple ports for the
benefit of users behind restrictive firewalls.
Indeed tor does bind to every single
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
grarpamp:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:46 PM, Gordon Morehouse
> wrote:
>> This isn't gonna cut it. A Tormail replacement that's any good,
>> that's reliable, that's censorship-resistant, that's hardened ...
>> that will require professionals to s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
B Sairafi:
> Hello
>
> I'm using Tor Browser, and I need to be seen by a specific website
> as if I'm in the US. Is this possible? I mean, is this a feature
> you already have?
It's *possible* but it's not easy, and it's not a feature.
You could u
On 8/18/2013 9:23 AM, Mary Ogle wrote:
> Thank you for including me for all these months, but I have discovered I do
> not understand enough to continue trying to read these emails. Good luck in
> your endeavors!
>
> Mary O.
>
> Sent from Mary's iPad
>
Hello Mary
We are sorry to see you go.
Hello
I'm using Tor Browser, and I need to be seen by a specific website as if
I'm in the US. Is this possible? I mean, is this a feature you already have?
I'm sorry if this is the wrong email address, I'm very confused!
Thanks,
- B
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To un
Thank you for including me for all these months, but I have discovered I do not
understand enough to continue trying to read these emails. Good luck in your
endeavors!
Mary O.
Sent from Mary's iPad
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsusbscribe or change other setti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
harmony:
> Nathan Suchy:
>> But will Flash go through Tor? Also I'm just looking through an
>> Internet Chatroom not activist work. The admin is a hacker but I
>> don't think I'll need to hide my IP other than from software...
>
> In the TBB design
Adrelanos said:
> Overall I like the idea, since it forces no one to participate. Nodes
> not interested in getting bitcoin donations, just don't get any.
>
> What about bridges? Any way to reward them as well?
>
> George Kadianakis:
> > As a simplified example, if the Tor network has 4 relays w
Nathan Suchy:
> But will Flash go through Tor? Also I'm just looking through an Internet
> Chatroom not activist work. The admin is a hacker but I don't think I'll
> need to hide my IP other than from software...
In the TBB design document
[https://www.torproject.org/projects/torbrowser/design/],
But will Flash go through Tor? Also I'm just looking through an Internet
Chatroom not activist work. The admin is a hacker but I don't think I'll
need to hide my IP other than from software...
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 5:58 PM, harmony wrote:
> Nathan Suchy:
> > I'm investigating a internet chat
20 matches
Mail list logo
