When I signup at Hushmail while using TBB I no longer see option for a
free account, only the premium accounts. I've closed TBB several times
and get the same options at Hushmail. Could anyone else confirm this?
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.t
Got a couple of questions :
What are the american nazis and their accomplices in the 'first world'
'free democracies' (like england and germany) actually doing?
Can they record all internet traffic? Is there an estimate of the
technical resources involved in doing so
On Mo, Jul 08 2013, grarpamp wrote:
>> From the paper by Murdoch and Zieliński [3]:
>> [3] http://www.freehaven.net/anonbib/#murdoch-pet2007
>> “We suggest that existing models, based on Autonomous System (AS)
>> diversity, do not properly take account of the fact that while, at
>> the AS level a
click https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk,
scroll to the bottom, and enter your email address to unsubscribe
On 8 July 2013 22:43, Amin Ansarifard wrote:
> i don`t want to receive any email from tor..please unsubscribe these
> kinds of emails..
> __
i don`t want to receive any email from tor..please unsubscribe these
kinds of emails..
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>> diversity, physically it could repeatedly pass through the same
>> Internet eXchange (IX).”
See also:
http://www.ixmaps.ca/
And about a decade ago there was a researcher who compiled
fiber right-of-way maps from public sources and wrote a paper
discussing vulnerability of Internet structure to
I no longer work on this system but I forwarded your mail to someone who
does.
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 8:26 PM, tagnaq wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> > Thanks for the explanation. For now we're in the middle of
> > including the blutmagie list. But yes, switching
> From the paper by Murdoch and Zieliński [3]:
> [3] http://www.freehaven.net/anonbib/#murdoch-pet2007
> “We suggest that existing models, based on Autonomous System (AS)
> diversity, do not properly take account of the fact that while, at
> the AS level abstraction, a path may have good administr
Perhaps email me directly as I think WinDivert is getting off-topic for
tor-talk? But:
> b) kernel resource consumption impact, if any. does a lot of traffic
>through the diversion consume significantly more non paged pool, or is
>the overhead negligible under load?
The non-paged memory usag
