On Thu, 23 May 2013 17:14:14 +, Tom Ritter wrote:
> On 23 May 2013 16:27, Nathan Suchy wrote:
> > The hidden service protocol needs major modifications as it is very slow. I
> > actually don't use hidden services but see the use in them and think that
> > the hidden services need a better prot
Hi All,
I have Tor installed in /Applications, and the Settings specify a Data
Directory of /Applications/TorBrowser_en-US.app/Contents/Resources/Data/Tor.
How does one change so so each user gets his/her own data directory?
Does Tor perform shell/variable expansion?
Jeff
___
On 23.05.2013 22:23, Nathan Suchy wrote:
> I'm looking for email providers with decent support, a good amount of
> storage, and that protect your privacy. Do you know any?
In the end, for plaintext email, you always have to "trust" the
operator. There's valid reasons for going with Google for some
Hello
I read the thread about email providers blocking registration/signup
through Tor, and I have experienced the same problem on some forums.
But the regime often seems to be arbitrarily enforced -- you can't
register from a Tor exit node, but a VPN or simple web proxy will do.
Alsosome servic
After doing some research and Mike from Tor pointing me in the right
direction,
It appears there are several key issues with Google Chrome that allow for
Leaks.
This would require big adjustments by Google to correct the situation. At
this point, it does not appear Google will participate.
An a
On 23 May 2013 16:27, Nathan Suchy wrote:
> The hidden service protocol needs major modifications as it is very slow. I
> actually don't use hidden services but see the use in them and think that
> the hidden services need a better protocol...
Can hidden services talk SPDY? The resource push fea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23 May 2013, at 18:44, Griffin Boyce wrote:
> Tom Ritter wrote:
>
>> On 23 May 2013 05:00, Bernard Tyers - ei8fdb wrote:
>>> Can you explain what you mean by usability considerations? (I might have
>> a different meaning of it, just curious)
>
You can just use Chromium it is open source and it works great. The
downside is using Chromium would require the Tor Project to change its
development procedures. Chromium is designed to be a personalized browser
while Firefox focuses on making a usable and secure, and decently fast web
browser. I
I use random name generators and store the passwords in a spreadsheet.
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
> On 23.05.2013 18:54, Seth David Schoen wrote:
> >> Would it be advisable to setup a small pool of random logins that Tor
> users could share?
> > In the late 1990s peopl
The hidden service protocol needs major modifications as it is very slow. I
actually don't use hidden services but see the use in them and think that
the hidden services need a better protocol...
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Griffin Boyce wrote:
> Tom Ritter wrote:
>
> > On 23 May 2013 05:0
I'm looking for email providers with decent support, a good amount of
storage, and that protect your privacy. Do you know any?
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Ok I disabled the digest mode so I can reply to topics. I find it really
cool that the Tor Project using Mailing Lists. It is a very good method for
communcation.
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Zece Anonimescu wrote:
> David Vorick:
> > if you were to reply to a digest, would only the people
On Thu, 23 May 2013 10:32:07 -0700
Seth David Schoen wrote:
> Andrew F writes:
>
> > I does appear that chrome is a free software but not open source. They
> > call it proprietary but free software. Is the licensing the issue?
> > Apparently they locked down the code with there terms of service.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Well either way V8 json is
open-source and thats what this question related too. -BEGIN PGP
SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRnnKsAAoJEHJ6fv5JwWqhxfcH/RKdvlMgHLWnVdJL4aF/AhOu
kxn+AP7h/eMqg4DrjamsPUUTEPJnTHvZNosOeBJiCi
Seth David Schoen:
> Free software and open source software are intended to refer to the
> _same software_.
Of course not.
Free software is about helping people be free. It has to do with
freedom. Open source is just one of the requirements.
Open source movement is about corporate PR.
The confu
Tom Ritter wrote:
> On 23 May 2013 05:00, Bernard Tyers - ei8fdb wrote:
> > Can you explain what you mean by usability considerations? (I might have
> a different meaning of it, just curious)
>
> I think what he means is that most websites are built with a
> tremendous number of referenced image
Thanks for the correction.
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Seth David Schoen wrote:
> Andrew F writes:
>
> > I does appear that chrome is a free software but not open source. They
> > call it proprietary but free software. Is the licensing the issue?
> > Apparently they locked down the code wi
Andrew F writes:
> I does appear that chrome is a free software but not open source. They
> call it proprietary but free software. Is the licensing the issue?
> Apparently they locked down the code with there terms of service.
Free software and open source software are intended to refer to the
_s
On 23.05.2013 18:54, Seth David Schoen wrote:
>> Would it be advisable to setup a small pool of random logins that Tor users
>> could share?
> In the late 1990s people upset with the trend of requiring accounts on
> Internet sites started a convention of signing up as user "cypherpunks",
There is
krishna e bera writes:
> Would it be advisable to setup a small pool of random logins that Tor users
> could share?
In the late 1990s people upset with the trend of requiring accounts on
Internet sites started a convention of signing up as user "cypherpunks",
password "cypherpunks". Sometimes,
David Vorick:
> if you were to reply to a digest, would only the people who get a digest
> see the reply?
No. Everybody sees what you send to tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Including the junk you have not edited out.
And about top posting you should read this:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/list
On Wed, 08 May 2013 10:57:29 +0200
Moritz Bartl wrote:
> It's more about unlinkability being one of the required properties for
> anonymity. You don't want anyone to be able to link earlier sessions to
> future sessions.
A number of videos on youtube require login to confirm age and all
require
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I use chrome and tor
together, though this is public browser. I use still use firefox always in
private mode with tor when I need private. That being said Google chrome,
has a Open Source engine Chromium which is Chrome with Pepper. And lastly
V8 Javasc
On 23.05.2013 17:25, David Vorick wrote:
> if you were to reply to a digest, would only the people who get a digest
> see the reply?
No. It will show up on the mailing list like any other (unconnected) new
posting. Together with a pretty much useless subject (unless modified by
the poster).
--
M
if you were to reply to a digest, would only the people who get a digest
see the reply?
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
> On 23.05.2013 13:25, Nathan Suchy wrote:
> > I figured out I can post topics but how do I reply to one? Also for a
> note
> > my messages are sent to me
I'm not sure if this deserves its own thread, but I've been looking around
for a decent guide on building your own hidden service. The idea of course
is to be perfectly safe, even in the event of a highly trafficked site that
has content which would draw the attention of many authorities.
It looks
On 23.05.2013 13:25, Nathan Suchy wrote:
> I figured out I can post topics but how do I reply to one? Also for a note
> my messages are sent to me in a digist so if that affects it let me know...
You use mailing lists like email. Just hit "reply" and write your reply.
Many email clients also show
On 23-05-13 12:03, Zece Anonimescu wrote:
The Doctor:
Check these out:
Wonderful! Precisely the thing I was looking for. Thank you so much!
Google can't help if one is asking a question too vague or generic.
«Static Site Generator» was the keyword for what I was looking for. All
that's left is
On 23 May 2013 05:00, Bernard Tyers - ei8fdb wrote:
> Can you explain what you mean by usability considerations? (I might have a
> different meaning of it, just curious)
I think what he means is that most websites are built with a
tremendous number of referenced images, css, and javascript. Web
I figured out I can post topics but how do I reply to one? Also for a note
my messages are sent to me in a digist so if that affects it let me know...
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/lis
Blibbet:
> Perhaps APAF (Anonymous Python Application Framework) might fit your needs.
Nice to have that in mind. Inpractical at the moment as I travel too
much to have a dedicated box. It would be so nice for the Tor project
too to expand the onion space with a few more sites. But not now.
_
The Doctor:
> Check these out:
Wonderful! Precisely the thing I was looking for. Thank you so much!
Google can't help if one is asking a question too vague or generic.
«Static Site Generator» was the keyword for what I was looking for. All
that's left is examine them long enough to decide which on
Griffin Boyce:
> If all you need is html, css, and images, then I'd recommend using
> BlueGriffon and avoiding a CMS. Your hidden service will run faster and
> you eliminate the risk of database injection or CMS vulnerabilities.
That was my point. A CMS that outputs plain HTML and no dynamic stuf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Griffin,
On 22 May 2013, at 21:46, Griffin Boyce wrote:
> Gregory Disney wrote:
>
>> Creating a .onion site is no difference between creating a normal site.
>> '.onion' is a address assigned a to a web server when it connects to the
>> tor netwo
On 5/22/13 11:46 PM, Griffin Boyce wrote:
> Gregory Disney wrote:
>
>> Creating a .onion site is no difference between creating a normal site.
>> '.onion' is a address assigned a to a web server when it connects to the
>> tor network.
>>
>
> Disagree to some extent. You don't want to pull in a b
35 matches
Mail list logo
