The GPG signature verification only works through the command line. The
instructions on the torproject website specifically state that, so I don't
think it's a but with anything. I think it's just a limitation of the
software. If you downloaded over HTTPS and verified the signature, then you
I am having a hard time reaching interested people ...
But let's try to make this happen anyways, everyone needs privacy. Even if
they live in #OC ;) Newspaper reporters and social activists are probably a
good crowd to target.
On Feb 24, 2013 1:46 PM, "Runa A. Sandvik" wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19,
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Joanna Rutkowska
> wrote:
>> 1) You mention "vm exploit" in a few places. While I understand your
>> intention, I think it's not quite fair to compare e.g. a vm exploit
>> against Virtual Box with a vm exploit against Qubes. Even comparing
>> Virtual Box against
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:51 PM, SiNA Rabbani wrote:
> I'm wondering if there would be enough interest to hold a Tor
> hack-fest/training or even a Crypto party in Orange County, California.
>
> I would love to host such events in my work space, if you think you
> maybe interested please reply.
I
On 24 Feb 2013 10:26, "Chunkylover2007" wrote:
>
>
> Hi joe here again and i dont think my fone is rooted it says that u can
use orbot without the fone being rooted so i think thats why i cannot get
firefox or ttb but can i root my fone without a computer ?
That's beyond the scope of this list.
Hi joe here again and i dont think my fone is rooted it says that u can use
orbot without the fone being rooted so i think thats why i cannot get firefox
or ttb but can i root my fone without a computer ?
Sent from Samsung Mobile
___
tor-talk mailing
"Lutz Horn" wrote:
So it depends on where you are.
You cannot assert the IPs from "ping torproject.org" are the same
as the IP(s) used to connect to "torproject.org" at the HTTPS-level.
As you know, ping works at the ICMP-level and a 302 from the initial
HTTP 'GET/' results in a redirect to
On 24 Feb 2013 05:55, "Chunkylover2007" wrote:
>
> Hi joe here i have been using orbit and the little onion comes on top of
my fone and it says powered by the tor project but when i look at the
settings it says sorry you are not using tor and i have downloaded
everything except i cannot get firefo
나의 iPhone에서 보냄
2013. 2. 24. 7:41 PM Fabian Keil wrote:
> Nam Su wrote:
>
>> When I tried to verify signatures with GPA, gpg frontend, it was failed.
>> I download Tor packages in torproject.org https version.
>>
>> Strangely, when I tried to verify with GPG command line, it was success.
>
Nam Su wrote:
> When I tried to verify signatures with GPA, gpg frontend, it was failed.
> I download Tor packages in torproject.org https version.
>
> Strangely, when I tried to verify with GPG command line, it was success.
Using gpg directly seems to be the recommended way:
https://www.torpr
Hi joe here i have been using orbit and the little onion comes on top of my
fone and it says powered by the tor project but when i look at the settings it
says sorry you are not using tor and i have downloaded everything except i
cannot get firefox or the tor browser so i am not realy using any
How to verify signatures for packages
Hi.
When I tried to verify signatures with GPA, gpg frontend, it was failed. I
download Tor packages in torproject.org https version.
Strangely, when I tried to verify with GPG command line, it was success.
Is it tor's asc file problem? Or is it GPA bug
Hi,
Am 24.02.2013 um 10:06 schrieb Nam Su:
> Is Tor website IP '82.195.79.101'?
>
> When I tried "ping torproject.org", it said me IP is "82.195.79.101".
Take a look at
http://www.just-dnslookup.com/index.php?vh=torproject.org&c=&s=dns+lookup!
You can see these IPs:
* 38.229.72.14
* 38.229
Hi.
Thanks everyone for kind answers.
Is Tor website IP '82.195.79.101'?
When I tried "ping torproject.org", it said me IP is "82.195.79.101".
2013. 2. 24. Am 7:21 Andrew Lewman wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 19:03:17 +0900
> Nam Su wrote:
>
>> I know Tor http website redirects Https ver
Hi Sukhbir ... THANKS, again.
GnuPG/OpenPGP signed & encrypted email message allows for minimum 62
or 68 wraplength, i can't recall the exact value at this moment, but
that min length would be nice to set. (That is my own choice,
obviously that will not be same as others/all).
I see that now #831
15 matches
Mail list logo
