On 08.01.2013 05:29, grarpamp wrote:
>> It is an interesting questions, if with a modern user interface, can they
>> get to new life?
> I see no reason the state of the art from the legacy remailer types
> can't be combined and updated into a new service running on some
> of the same relay machines
> It is an interesting questions, if with a modern user interface, can they
> get to new life?
I see no reason the state of the art from the legacy remailer types
can't be combined and updated into a new service running on some
of the same relay machines we have for Tor today. Even if only
10% ran
> I'm hoping this will be of interest to this list. To encourage
> interest in the waning art of remailers, I'm starting what I aim to be
> a long series on how they work, design choices, technical limitations,
> and attacks. The first five are now live at https://crypto.is/blog/
>
> -tom
Apprec
Will do, sorry about that! ^_^;
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Andrew Lewman wrote:
> An administrative note, please don't cross-post lists. Choose
> one. Thanks.
>
> --
> Andrew
> http://tpo.is/contact
> pgp 0x6B4D6475
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-
From: "Moritz Bartl"
On 07.01.2013 21:53, David H. Lipman wrote:
I'm hoping this will be of interest to this list. To encourage
interest in the waning art of remailers, I'm starting what I aim to be
a long series on how they work, design choices, technical limitations,
and attacks. The first
On 7 January 2013 15:53, David H. Lipman wrote:
> I hope you fully elaborate on how remailers are used for abuse.
>
> --
> Dave
I intend to, but I've never been the receiving end of remailer abuse,
so I've only got academic knowledge. I had a few ideas I was
brainstorming about this:
1) a shar
On 07.01.2013 21:53, David H. Lipman wrote:
>> I'm hoping this will be of interest to this list. To encourage
>> interest in the waning art of remailers, I'm starting what I aim to be
>> a long series on how they work, design choices, technical limitations,
>> and attacks. The first five are now
From: "Tom Ritter"
I'm hoping this will be of interest to this list. To encourage
interest in the waning art of remailers, I'm starting what I aim to be
a long series on how they work, design choices, technical limitations,
and attacks. The first five are now live at https://crypto.is/blog/
I'm hoping this will be of interest to this list. To encourage
interest in the waning art of remailers, I'm starting what I aim to be
a long series on how they work, design choices, technical limitations,
and attacks. The first five are now live at https://crypto.is/blog/
-tom
__
An administrative note, please don't cross-post lists. Choose
one. Thanks.
--
Andrew
http://tpo.is/contact
pgp 0x6B4D6475
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
OK, now all signatures at the place, thanks.
On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 13:30:56 +
unknown wrote:
>
> https://www.torproject.org/dist/torbrowser/linux/
>
> https://www.torproject.org/dist/torbrowser/linux/tor-browser-gnu-linux-i686-2.3.25-2-dev-en-US.tar.gz
> https://www.torproject.org/dist/torbro
Hello,
I´m trying to build tor version 0.2.3.25 on a Synology DiskStation running
BusyBox.
Although I installed the openssl and openssl-dev packages version 0.9.8v I
am getting the following error running the configure script:
Found linkable openssl in (system), but it does not seem to run, even
12 matches
Mail list logo
