I'm 3G. I'll read the thread
On Nov 9, 2012 9:41 PM, "Mike Perry" wrote:
> Thus spake Pete K (asdp...@gmail.com):
>
> > Hi I have a strange Orbot issue that has puzzled me for some weeks. Orbot
> > while on my wifi network works with most of my apps. But when I am off my
> > wifi network (on my m
Thus spake Pete K (asdp...@gmail.com):
> Hi I have a strange Orbot issue that has puzzled me for some weeks. Orbot
> while on my wifi network works with most of my apps. But when I am off my
> wifi network (on my mobile data) my browser and apps (facebook, Pandora,
> internet browsing) on my Galax
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 11:19:57PM +0900, namfree...@gmail.com wrote 0.3K bytes
in 9 lines about:
: I saw some Internet pages. In there, they can know my ip with JavaScript in
spite of using Tor.
: I can't believe this but I am worried about this.
https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq.html.en#TBBJ
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 12:15:08PM +1100, peter+...@metaverse.org wrote 1.4K
bytes in 41 lines about:
: I'm more than happy to help as well, however, how does that fix the
: issue of torcheck not starting on reboot?
the check wsgi script starts with apache just fine. The issue is tordnsel
require
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I'm more than happy to help as well, however, how does that fix the
issue of torcheck not starting on reboot?
On 10/11/12 7:37 AM, adrelanos wrote:
> Become a torcheck developer. Help with these tickets:
>
>
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 06:05:58PM -0500, mfi...@mfisch.com wrote 1.0K bytes in
18 lines about:
: TorProject should be registered as an Apple software developer, and the
binary should be signed, both to increase credibility of the torproject and the
safety of users.
No. The last time we reviewe
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 10:49:39AM -0500, dr...@virtadpt.net wrote 0.8K bytes
in 28 lines about:
: Did something go pear-shaped with check.torproject.org? I've not been
: able to get it to respond (through the TBB or otherwise) for the past
: day or so.
Yes. It comes and goes. Something yet to b
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 06:09:36PM -0500, mfi...@mfisch.com wrote 0.7K bytes in
16 lines about:
: Upon signing up for the mailing list on the list server, my password was
emailed to me in plaintext. In the year 2012 this is extremely bad security
practice. At the very least the sign-up page shou
Greg Norcie:
> I guess it comes down to risk calculus:
>
> Which has a worse outcome: training users to ignore security warning
> from OSX, or the chilling effects an Apple NDA could have on the project.
>
> (I don't pretend to know the answer myself.)
I think the answer is near "use the securit
I guess it comes down to risk calculus:
Which has a worse outcome: training users to ignore security warning
from OSX, or the chilling effects an Apple NDA could have on the project.
(I don't pretend to know the answer myself.)
--
Greg Norcie (g...@norcie.com)
GPG key: 0x1B873635
On 11/9/12 6:2
Roger Dingledine:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 06:05:58PM -0500, Matthew Fisch wrote:
>> TorProject should be registered as an Apple software developer, and the
>> binary should be signed, both to increase credibility of the torproject
>> and the safety of users.
>
> I agree with you about the 'safet
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 06:09:36PM -0500, Matthew Fisch wrote:
> I used a unique random password for this mailing list, I'm going to
>guess however a significant portion of the mailing list either uses this
>password in other locations, a significant subset of them probably can't
>trust their mailb
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 06:05:58PM -0500, Matthew Fisch wrote:
> TorProject should be registered as an Apple software developer, and the
>binary should be signed, both to increase credibility of the torproject
>and the safety of users.
I agree with you about the 'safety of users' side. But I'm not
Upon signing up for the mailing list on the list server, my password was
emailed to me in plaintext. In the year 2012 this is extremely bad security
practice. At the very least the sign-up page should warn users to make the
password unique.
The password may also be stored in reverseable format.
The installer can be verified with PGP using the published signature and GPG or
PGP software. This however, is beyond the technical prowess of the vast
majority of Mac OS X users of the torbrowser bundle.
TorProject should be registered as an Apple software developer, and the binary
should be s
Been using the controller form of this since it was fixed.
Haven't had a chance to check the torrc form and related
observations. Just saying thanks for implementing it is all :)
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torpro
Become a torcheck developer. Help with these tickets:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/query?status=accepted&status=assigned&status=new&status=reopened&component=Tor+Check&order=priority&col=id&col=summary&col=type&col=status&col=priority&col=milestone&col=component
Simon Brereton:
> Can
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 01:27:03PM -0600, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> >https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq#TBBSocksPort
> >
> That article mentions OS X / Linux, but I don't know that the issue
> of Tor using other random ports (in the FAQ) does NOT apply also to
> Windows?
The Windows TBB doesn't set th
On 11/9/2012 10:33 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 01:45:22PM +0100, jiang song wrote:
hi, I think sock proxy port should be 9050
but with TBB, I notice that the socket port changes every time I started
TBB, like 49223, 58871
what is the reason for this? and is it possible t
* The Doctor wrote:
> Did something go pear-shaped with check.torproject.org? I've not
> been able to get it to respond (through the TBB or otherwise) for
> the past day or so.
It just works for me. Does https://check.extc.org/ work for you?
--
Tahoe-LAFS - You see this name, you think dirty.
Can I help? What would you need?
On Nov 9, 2012 1:55 PM, "Roger Dingledine" wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 01:08:15PM -0500, TorOp wrote:
> > Same here, but it just now responded.
>
> Yes. Apparently it doesn't start on reboot. Also, it's old and buggy.
>
> We're looking into ways to improve i
Working for me.
--
Greg Norcie (g...@norcie.com)
GPG key: 0x1B873635
On 11/9/12 12:38 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> On 11/9/2012 9:49 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>> Did something go pear-shaped with check.torproject.org? I've not been
>> able to get it to respond (through the TBB or otherwise) for the past
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 01:08:15PM -0500, TorOp wrote:
> Same here, but it just now responded.
Yes. Apparently it doesn't start on reboot. Also, it's old and buggy.
We're looking into ways to improve it, but all the Tor developers are
distracted by other things, so it keeps falling out of the pri
Same here, but it just now responded.
On 11/9/2012 10:49 AM, The Doctor wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Did something go pear-shaped with check.torproject.org? I've not been
able to get it to respond (through the TBB or otherwise) for the past
day or so.
___
On 11/9/2012 9:49 AM, The Doctor wrote:
Did something go pear-shaped with check.torproject.org? I've not been
able to get it to respond (through the TBB or otherwise) for the past
day or so.
It's down for me too. You could use another "What's my IP" lookup site,
that gives name / location of
On 11/9/2012 8:19 AM, Nam Su wrote:
I saw some Internet pages. In there, they can know my ip with JavaScript in
spite of using Tor.
I can't believe this but I am worried about this.
Is it true?
Short answer is no, if you don't change a bunch of default settings in
TBB, or don't use addons /
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 01:45:22PM +0100, jiang song wrote:
> hi, I think sock proxy port should be 9050
> but with TBB, I notice that the socket port changes every time I started
> TBB, like 49223, 58871
> what is the reason for this? and is it possible to make it constant?
https://www.torprojec
On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 23:19:57 +0900
Nam Su wrote:
> I saw some Internet pages. In there, they can know my ip with
> JavaScript in spite of using Tor.
>
> I can't believe this but I am worried about this.
>
> Is it true?
This question was answered when you asked 2 days ago.
Please note there is
Hi Jiang. See "SocksPort" on...
https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-manual.html.en
The browser bundle sets it to 'auto' to avoid port conflicts. You can
set it to a static value in your torrc. That said, if you're still
trying to script against tor then I'd suggest not using the browser
bundle. It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Did something go pear-shaped with check.torproject.org? I've not been
able to get it to respond (through the TBB or otherwise) for the past
day or so.
- --
The Doctor [412/724/301/703] [ZS (MED)]
Developer, Project Byzantium: http://project-byzantiu
I saw some Internet pages. In there, they can know my ip with JavaScript in
spite of using Tor.
I can't believe this but I am worried about this.
Is it true?
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/m
hi, I think sock proxy port should be 9050
but with TBB, I notice that the socket port changes every time I started
TBB, like 49223, 58871
what is the reason for this? and is it possible to make it constant?
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torpr
32 matches
Mail list logo
