Tor 0.2.4.5-alpha comes hard at the heels of 0.2.4.4-alpha, to fix
two important security vulnerabilities that could lead to remotely
triggerable relay crashes, fix a major bug that was preventing clients
from choosing suitable exit nodes, and refactor some of our code.
https://www.torproject.org/
Tor 0.2.3.24-rc fixes two important security vulnerabilities that
could lead to remotely triggerable relay crashes, and fixes
a major bug that was preventing clients from choosing suitable exit
nodes.
I hope this will be the final release candidate for the 0.2.3 series.
That is, if we don't find a
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 23:36:21 +0200
esolve esolve wrote:
> I'm wondering whether it is possible to configure number of tor relay nodes
> from client
> now , the default number is 3, is it possible to make it 2?
> thanks!
Yes it is possible with the source code or using a Tor controller to build y
I'm wondering whether it is possible to configure number of tor relay nodes
from client
now , the default number is 3, is it possible to make it 2?
thanks!
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailma
torcshoulddec...@hushmail.com:
>
> Thanks for all these years,
>
> If TBB current "default" policy and strategy - is for obfuscating the
> user for the portal to the point it is known that it is Tor user using
> - that is not productive after all:
> 1. Site administrators (like freenode and wikip
Thanks for all these years,
If TBB current "default" policy and strategy - is for obfuscating the
user for the portal to the point it is known that it is Tor user using
- that is not productive after all:
1. Site administrators (like freenode and wikipedia did) block Tor
users (that aren't using
Hi,
There are a lot more language packs [1] than on the TBB download page...
Is it safe to install those language support addons into TBB or could
that effect browser fingerprinting?
Is it safe to use the -UILocale command line switch for Tor Browser? [1]
Cheers,
adrelanos
[1]
http://download-
On 10/25/12 12:38 AM, Julian Yon wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 15:39:49 +0200
> intrigeri wrote:
>> On the Tails side, we have decided to wait a bit for the dust to
>> settle, and for our upstreams (Linux, Debian, Debian Live) to support
>> embedded and ARM platforms better, before we even try supp