> Who knows about Advanced Onion Router?
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/advtor/
http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/Oct-2010/msg00026.html
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor
Please help with a problem I am having.
I have downloaded the newest TOR bundle from the website. I have then
installed the latest version of DownThemAll from the Ad-Ins site. I then
reset the whole lot and Downthemall doesn't work. (right click on the dTa
menu option and the dTa windw does not o
Who knows about Advanced Onion Router?
http://sourceforge.net/projects/advtor/
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>> Personally I don't really like them. I think using hidden service as an
>> IP address for peer to peer (like torchat) is a risk factor although I
>> don't know enough to know for sure.
>You think. Not saying it's perfect and security should not be increased,
>but no one was ever exposed due to
r...@tormail.org:
> How does one configure Xchat to use Tor?
>
> ___
> tor-talk mailing list
> tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
The TorifyHOWTO [1] contains a lot information about XChat a
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 18:37 +, Runa A. Sandvik wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 5:59 PM, wrote:
> > How does one configure Xchat to use Tor?
>
> Configure it to use a socks4/socks5 proxy on 127.0.0.1:9050 or
> whatever port Tor is currently using (9050 for TBB on Windows, random
> port on OS
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 5:59 PM, wrote:
> How does one configure Xchat to use Tor?
Configure it to use a socks4/socks5 proxy on 127.0.0.1:9050 or
whatever port Tor is currently using (9050 for TBB on Windows, random
port on OS X and Linux, Vidalia Bundle will always use 9050 by
default).
--
Ru
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 10:05:53 +, Seth David Schoen wrote:
...
> I think it's akin to port knocking:
More like configuring ssh on a nonstandard port: You can still
get to it with off-the-shelf software (as long as you consider
tor and a socks-capable netcat as such).
Random association: Somethi
How does one configure Xchat to use Tor?
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:25:46 +, Daniel Dennis wrote:
...
> But I didn't think about accessing a computer via ssh using hidden
> services. Having ssh access can ruin security but is there a reason the
> server/computer must be hidden? I'd understand why you or your connect
> should be hidden but
> Personally I don't really like them. I think using hidden service as an
> IP address for peer to peer (like torchat) is a risk factor although I
> don't know enough to know for sure.
You think. Not saying it's perfect and security should not be increased,
but no one was ever exposed due to a Tor
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:07 PM, intrigeri wrote:
> adrelanos wrote (16 Oct 2012 18:28:19 GMT) :
>> UTC is fine. Afaik Tails, Liberte Linux and Whonix are using UTC.
>
> It looks like *displaying* UTC for everybody is a UX failure.
>
> What would be best, IMHO, is to have UTC as the system timezon
Daniel Dennis writes:
> But I didn't think about accessing a computer via ssh using hidden
> services. Having ssh access can ruin security but is there a reason the
> server/computer must be hidden? I'd understand why you or your connect
> should be hidden but why the server?
I think it's akin to
> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 08:28:37 +0200
> From: Andreas Krey
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Will Hidden Service Be Removed?
> Message-ID: <20121017062837.gp18...@inner.h.iocl.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 22:59:40 +,
thank you for this info.
then it sounds that piratebay are quite foolish to do this!
--
Jerzy Łogiewa -- jerz...@interia.eu
On Oct 17, 2012, at 12:35 PM, Andrea Shepard wrote:
> Seconded; you can't trust VMs on hardware you don't control for anything
> that needs to stay private - at least not
Hi,
adrelanos wrote (16 Oct 2012 18:28:19 GMT) :
> Abel Luck:
>> I need to do more research into what it would take to protect the
>> localtime. For example, what are the consequences (technically and
>> UX-wise) of changing the local timezone to, presumably, UTC?
> UTC is fine. Afaik Tails, Lib
adrelanos:
> The Doctor:
>> On 10/10/2012 08:59 PM, adrelanos wrote:
>>
>>> Alternative startup scripts for the Tor Browser Bundle. For
>>> starting up Tor Browser without Tor and Vidalia.
>>
>> There's an easier way to go about it:
>>
>> https://github.com/virtadpt/Experiments/blob/master/tbb.sh
>
Hi All,
I have the modem/router Asus DSL-N10E connected to a PC via Ethernet cable. I
am using Tor on the PC without any problem...
AFAIK, there is no version of Tor for my mobile Nokia 5800 xp. I 'd like to
know if it is possible to configure Tor so that all connections via the modem
will pas
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:18:02AM +0100, t...@lists.grepular.com wrote:
> > This seems like a good strategy for hidden service. Maybe it is OT
> > a little, but how can I have encrypted VM for my hidden service
> > where boot password is securely typed? Some cloud service gives
> > virtual consol
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 17/10/12 11:02, Jerzy Łogiewa wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I just watching this:
> http://torrentfreak.com/pirate-bay-moves-to-the-cloud-becomes-raid-proof-121017/
>
> This seems like a good strategy for hidden service. Maybe it is OT
> a little, but how
Hello!
I just watching this:
http://torrentfreak.com/pirate-bay-moves-to-the-cloud-becomes-raid-proof-121017/
This seems like a good strategy for hidden service. Maybe it is OT a little,
but how can I have encrypted VM for my hidden service where boot password is
securely typed? Some cloud ser
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 22:59:40 -0700
Daniel Dennis wrote:
> Me me me me it's all about m!
EPIC TROLL
--
3072D/F3A66B3A Julian Yon (2012 General Use)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.tor
[Yeah, yeah, trolling the troll back will get boring fast, I know...]
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:59:40PM -0700, Daniel Dennis wrote:
> Personally I don't really like them. I think using hidden service as an
> IP address for peer to peer (like torchat) is a risk factor although I
> don't know enoug
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 22:59:40 +, Daniel Dennis wrote:
...
> But I also think all the content in a hidden service are not
> beneficial to anyone.
So what? It is sufficient when my hidden services are beneficial
to me - I can operate a computer behind a NAT or firewall and
expose its ssh port as
Personally I don't really like them. I think using hidden service as an
IP address for peer to peer (like torchat) is a risk factor although I
don't know enough to know for sure. (Maybe the already in place guards
fix that?). But I also think all the content in a hidden service are not
beneficial t
25 matches
Mail list logo
