Riseup is not a company or corporation. https://help.riseup.net/en/about-us
That being said, I have no way to verify what they do and do not log.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> On 8/2/2012 6:04 PM, Douglas Lucas wrote:
>
>> I use riseup. My current storage quota -- which I
Last I checked encryption in yahoo mail is only available for login to your
account. Everything else goes in the clear easily intercepted if an exit is
logging. Easily intercepted over open wifi in a cafe.
> Why would Yahoo allow using Tor? Or, is it that the
> acct was NOT created using Tor, b
On 8/2/2012 6:04 PM, Douglas Lucas wrote:
I use riseup. My current storage quota -- which I believe would be
yours, were you to sign up -- is 92 MB. Riseup says the storage
quota fluctuates a bit and might go up in the future. I think you
can also request a higher quota if you have good reasons.
Hi Tor Talk,
Lurker and user of Tor here. Thanks y'all for your hard work making Tor
possible!
Joe Btfsplk joebtfs...@gmx.com:
> 2nd, I can't find anywhere - w/o signing up - what Riseup's general
> "starting" storage quota or max message and / or attachment size
> limits are, even using search
Joe Btfsplk:
> Why would Yahoo allow using Tor? Or, is it that the acct was NOT
> created using Tor, but later accessing it via Tor - * as antispam06
> mentioned * ? (not sure exactly what he meant) What would that
> accomplish, for anonymity? If you didn't create the acct w/ Tor (or
> proxy),
Joe Btfsplk:
> Thanks. Riseup says they don't store IP addresses or log emails. If
> (for a company in U.S.) the gov't will even ALLOW that, then that's good
> - as almost all provider say they log to some extent. BUT... considering
> ISPs, wireless providers, Skype - on & on - are being "forced"
On 8/1/2012 9:17 PM, grarpamp wrote:
Riseup has been recommend by (imho) trustworthy and honest people.
RiseUp is that place that makes you fill out *why* you want
one of their free accounts, your activism. What do you guys put in there?
Can you just leave it blank? Or say 'not applicable',
no r
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012, at 04:17, grarpamp wrote:
> > Riseup has been recommend by (imho) trustworthy and honest people.
> I'm happy with other comon non-gmail free providers. RiseUp
> is cool/important so I'd not use them unless I had to and could
> donate.
I had the same feeling when I first heard
On 8/2/2012 11:07 AM, anu nivas wrote:
Hello,
I would like to know how IP addresses are generated by Tor. If I use Tor ,
is there a chance that my IP address would be assigned as proxy address of
another Tor client?
If you mean, a chance that your REAL ISP - assigned address; assigned to
your r
anu nivas:
> Hello,
Hello,
I hope I understand you correctly.
> I would like to know how IP addresses are generated by Tor.
Tor doesn't generate IP addresses. You, the client, connect to an entry
node, which sees your IP address (but does not know where you want to
connect to), from there you
Anupama:
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 12:07 PM, anu nivas wrote:
> is there a chance that my IP address would be assigned as proxy address of
> another Tor client?
By default you are not an exit node (ie someone elses traffic exits
from your machine and appears to come from you), or even a non-exit
re
Hello,
I would like to know how IP addresses are generated by Tor. If I use Tor ,
is there a chance that my IP address would be assigned as proxy address of
another Tor client?
Thank You
Anupama
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
ht
On 8/1/2012 4:45 PM, adrelanos wrote:
Got it. Good point. There has been very few research done on that
subject. Always makes sense to use a trustworthy mail provider as an
activist instant of a non-trustworthy. Even if you use GPG. They can
still try a targeted attack on your browser of tell w
13 matches
Mail list logo
