Re: [tor-talk] Roger's status report, May 2012

On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote: >... > - Launch a working-group of pluggable transport developers and > researchers, and make sure they all know about each other. > ... I'll aim to get a pluggable transport development page up > on the website in June. sounds interesting!

[tor-talk] is ssh clean for tor use?

Hello, sorry if this is old news! is ssh (openssh-client) 1.5.5 good to use with torsocks? any dns leaks? -- Jerzy Łogiewa -- jerz...@interia.eu ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listi

Re: [tor-talk] Orbot Data Overhead

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 05:13:16PM -0400, Patrick B wrote: > I made a blog post > on > the Guardian site about the data cost incurred by Orbot usage. It generally > seems quite manageable for most use cases. Running in the backround 24/7 >

Re: [tor-talk] Webserver on 127.0.0.1 only?

Hey Rolf! I made this server.bind in lighttpd.conf and I can still connect from my local network. Is anything else in lighttpd that should be configured? -- Jerzy Łogiewa -- jerz...@interia.eu On May 9, 2012, at 9:02 AM, Ralf-Philipp Weinmann wrote: > server.bind = "127.0.0.1" > > in your li

[tor-talk] Roger's status report, May 2012

Hi folks! As the Tor Project has grown in scope, we've been struggling to keep up with simultaneously a) doing all the development that needs to be done (including meeting deliverables for our funders), and b) keeping the community up-to-date on our in-progress work. Lately I've been writing mont

Re: [tor-talk] vwfws4obovm2cydl.onion ??

>> harvested from malware... contained; vwfws4obovm2cydl.onion >> It contained a script file named; poclbm120222.cl > So from what it seems, the malware included a bitcoin miner > that perhaps is to report found blocks to ... this site in question. And surely the contents of any wallet it

Re: [tor-talk] vwfws4obovm2cydl.onion ??

From: "Zebro kojos" So from what it seems, the malware included a bitcoin miner that perhaps is to report found blocks / sub-hashes (? is that a term; i.e. if it works in a mining pool) to a server, perhaps this site in question. Maybe it is a Bitcoin Miner. I have seen numerous Bitcoin Mi

Re: [tor-talk] Tor-ramdisk 20120622 released

On 23 Jun 2012, at 16:58, Anthony G. Basile wrote: >> * Could I use Tor-Ramdisk to run a node on rackmount but diskless x86_64 >> hardware and boot from a hardware read-only USB stick? > Boot the vps from the iso image as if you're doing an install. I don't know > how rackmount nodes work, but I

Re: [tor-talk] Tor-ramdisk 20120622 released

On 06/22/2012 10:03 AM, MacLemon wrote: On 22 Jun 2012, at 15:03, Anthony G. Basile wrote: Tor-Ramdisk: i686, x86_64, MIPS * Have you thought about an ARM port, for example for the Raspberry Pi? I mostly do gentoo development where I bring kernel and toolchain hardening to uclibc systems.

Re: [tor-talk] [guardian-dev] Orbot v9 RC2 (with Tor 0.2.3.17-beta!) for testing

On 22/06/12 12:43 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote: On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 09:26:53AM -0400, Jerzy Łogiewa wrote: when will the orbot be available for iOS? It would seem a futile undertaking, given that Cupertino is likely to ban that app from the market very soon. If you're looking at just browsing, the

Re: [tor-talk] vwfws4obovm2cydl.onion ??

So from what it seems, the malware included a bitcoin miner that perhaps is to report found blocks / sub-hashes (? is that a term; i.e. if it works in a mining pool) to a server, perhaps this site in question. On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 4:06 PM, David H. Lipman wrote: > From: "grarpamp" > > Anbody

Re: [tor-talk] vwfws4obovm2cydl.onion ??

From: "grarpamp" Anbody have any information on; vwfws4obovm2cydl.onion ? You must have obtained the address from somewhere. So what did the ad copy or context associated with it say? 1.It was harvested from malware which dropped a file; hostname.tmp which contained the name; vwfws4