Thank you :)
Il giorno 05/giu/2012 02:25, "Andrew Lewman" ha
scritto:
> On Mon, 28 May 2012 16:59:43 +0200
> miniBill wrote:
> > I'm going to have a lot of users using tor on the machine, and my main
> > concern is one user interfering with another user privacy.
> > As it's a shared server, even
On Thu, 17 May 2012 19:06:17 +0100
ed1vel1 wrote:
> I decided to try running the Amazon Web Services Bridge relay instead,
> using the free tier. The management console indicates it is live, and
> the monitoring suggests traffic. However, it doesn't seem to reliably
> support a Tor client connec
On Mon, 28 May 2012 16:59:43 +0200
miniBill wrote:
> I'm going to have a lot of users using tor on the machine, and my main
> concern is one user interfering with another user privacy.
> As it's a shared server, even if someone can find out the source ip
> that's not a big deal, but what I want to
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 04:01:57 +0200
KςĦαm ellaisy wrote:
> I would like to know what language you used for the tor Browser and
> the scripts that you used to build it.i have seen gitweb but didnt
> see anything i neededi am not going to steal your project and sell it
> for my personal gain. i simply
I would like to know what language you used for the tor Browser and the scripts
that you used to build it.i have seen gitweb but didnt see anything i needed i
am not going to steal your project and sell it for my personal gain. i simply
want to know how you did it.Thanks,Kareem
Am I really the only person with this problem.
"Qt: Session management error: None of the authentication protocols specified
are supported"
Does this error matter or not?
Here is a reference:
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/november-2011-progress-report?amp
And: https://trac.torproject.org/p
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 10:30:13PM -0400, Nathan Freitas wrote:
> On 06/03/2012 09:30 PM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> > That does indeed seem like a better idea. We'll need to use something
> > like unbound anyway, so we can use TXT records all the same, I guess.
>
> Why not use SRV records?
>
> if
My take is that [hex].onion is not really a domain name, but an address
in a new address family for a different protocol, which has then been
stuck into a domain name.
So the technically right thing to do, all practical considerations
aside, is to define a new family, analagous to A and , perh
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i would like to know if it's possible to determine if a TorHS is
> non-existing or if it's non-reachable (exists but there is a connection
> problem).
I believe this turned into https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/tic
