On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Andrew Lewman wrote:
> bittorrent trackers are fine, it's the bulk download of GB of data 7x24
> that loads up the network.
Wanted to add a bit here from another view.
I see no issue with bulk data transfer, so long as you give
back empty bandwidth equal to your
> Robert Ransom wrote:
> Use Tor 0.2.3.x-alpha, give the user 10 or more SocksPorts and 10 or
> more DNSPorts to point things which really need to be anonymous at,
> and no TransPort.
I think both are useful. Using TransPort as a safety packet log
and proxy catchall for whatever apps might defy So
On 2012-03-01, proper proper wrote:
> I was told, to ask this question here. [3]
>
> Tor's transparent proxy feature is at the moment a bit complicated to take
> advantage off and therefore unpopular. That might change in the future,
> because a) documentation improves [1]; b) in the future (depen
Ok, thanks for your reply!
__
powered by Secure-Mail.biz - anonymous and secure e-mail accounts.
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/lis
On 2012-03-02, Andrew Lewman wrote:
> The trick is, I like to think I know what I'm doing and that I'll
> notice if apt-get or my VM image fails to transfer untouched. Whether
> I'll actually notice a sophisticated exploit in deb packages or my vm
> image modified in perfect way that gpg or sha25
On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 00:12:44 +0100
"proper proper" wrote:
> You ask the user not to use Bittorrent over Tor, as the network can
> not handle the load.
bittorrent trackers are fine, it's the bulk download of GB of data 7x24
that loads up the network.
> What about operating system updates behind
> "proper proper" writes:
>
> [...]
>
> >>
> You can easily do so by separating traffic at user level (root vs. regular
> users). Why do we need a special package for such a simple task?
> >
> >
> That's not possible. Everything behind the transparent proxy, root or regular
> user, has only two o
--- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
Von: Moritz Bartl
Datum: 02.03.2012 01:27:58
An: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Betreff: Re: [tor-talk] Operating system updates / software installation
behind Tor Transparent Proxy
> On 02.03.2012 00:12, proper proper wrote:
> > You ask the user not to use
> Bit
"proper proper" writes:
[...]
>> You can easily do so by separating traffic at user level (root vs. regular
>> users). Why do we need a special package for such a simple task?
>
> That's not possible. Everything behind the transparent proxy, root or regular
> user, has only two options, use T
> "proper proper" writes:
>
> > I
> was told, to ask this question here. [3]
> >
> > Tor's transparent proxy
> feature is at the moment a bit complicated to take
> > advantage off and
> therefore unpopular. That might change in the future, because
> > a) documentation
> improves [1]; b) in the fut
"proper proper" writes:
> I was told, to ask this question here. [3]
>
> Tor's transparent proxy feature is at the moment a bit complicated to take
> advantage off and therefore unpopular. That might change in the future,
> because
> a) documentation improves [1]; b) in the future (depending on
On 02.03.2012 00:12, proper proper wrote:
> You ask the user not to use Bittorrent over Tor, as the network can not
> handle the load.
The problem is that Bittorrent opens a lot of concurrent connections to
download many pieces at once. And all those "Tweak your Torrent client
and get mighty migh
I was told, to ask this question here. [3]
Tor's transparent proxy feature is at the moment a bit complicated to take
advantage off and therefore unpopular. That might change in the future, because
a) documentation improves [1]; b) in the future (depending on the outcome of
this bug) there migh
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 10:07:43AM -0500, Chris Wheeler wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:17 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> >
> > Though HS is more hops away, I doubt it would affect timing or byte
> > counting all that much.
> >
It wouldn't.
> > That was my first thought too, but then what is the point
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:17 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> >>> It may take a while for a clientA to use said entry but when
> >>> they do it seems it would be quite easy to time/count correlate
> >>> or munge the HS traffic of clientA. And only require two nodes
> >>> (hs, entry) and no GPA taps to do so
Thanks for that, works like a charm.
Op 1-3-2012 12:28, Andy Dixon schreef:
On 01/03/12 10:18, Koos Huisman wrote:
Hi,
I'm not using my Bittorrent over TOR.
I'm using TOR to connect to thepiratebay.se website as here in Holland
that website is blocked by my provider (Ziggo).
Then I download
On 01/03/12 10:18, Koos Huisman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not using my Bittorrent over TOR.
>
> I'm using TOR to connect to thepiratebay.se website as here in Holland
> that website is blocked by my provider (Ziggo).
> Then I download the torrent files into my bittorrent program which is
> configured to
Hi,
I'm not using my Bittorrent over TOR.
I'm using TOR to connect to thepiratebay.se website as here in Holland
that website is blocked by my provider (Ziggo).
Then I download the torrent files into my bittorrent program which is
configured to use the internet in the normal way.
Only
The
18 matches
Mail list logo
