The posted script uses the "openssl speed" command to evaluate the
node's encryption performance. This command iterates through every
algorithm OpenSSL supports, most of which Tor doesn't use. There is
also a bug in OpenSSL where the speed command alone does not utilize
encryption accelerator
Hi,
I've put up some graphical world maps of the tor user to internet
population per country ratio. Tor user statistics are from
https://metrics.torproject.org/users.html and the internet pop. per
country data from the world factbook site (latest data set is from 2009).
To cut a long story short,
On 11.01.2012 21:40, Kyle Williams wrote:
> I would recommend you download this ASAP if you want it as I'm dumping my
> hosting provider at the end of the week and I haven't picked a replacement
> yet.
Thanks for pointing that out. Although it is deprecated, I don't think
the world needs to lose i
Hi Marco,
Please discuss the DoS in public forums, I'm not interested in helping
you hide details of your supposed attack. The norms for open source
development may conflict with your expectations of scientific papers,
but that's your problem not ours.
-andy
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:47:37AM +
Hi all. I just want to inform tor-talks that I had a productive dialog
with these extension`s developer and FireFTP`s DNS leakage is fixed
now. If someone interested - please make some testing.
Here are some details of our conversation:
Hey Greg,
I think I might have a solution for this. I've u
1) You didn't e-mail me or coderman directly and
2) I don't always stay on top of the Tor mailing list so
3) Here's your open source solution the Tor project paid us for.
http://janusvm.com/tor_vm/
For whatever reason, ask Roger or someone else, Tor VM isn't hosted on the
torproject.org site anym
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 06:33:14PM +0100, Moritz Bartl wrote:
> I see a lot of scary warnings in the Tor logs on our high bandwidth
> nodes (>400 Mbps): "Error binding network socket: Address already in use".
We recently saw this on noisetor until we set tcp_tw_recycle = 1.
https://www.noisebridg
On Wednesday 11 January 2012 07:34:35 Klaus Layer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just received an email about a tor relay survey. Do other tor relay
> operators received the same email? Does anyone know something about this
> survey? I am wondering why this mailing list was not contacted before.
I did not
On 1/10/2012 2:02 PM, Curious Kid wrote:
Insinuating that Tor is adware and that the Tor Project is being
compensated for delivering user data is outrageous. There's been a
recent increase in FUD (because of the SOPA vote?), but this is pretty
over the top.
1st, there's no such thing as a free
I set the default search engine to DuckDuckGo when not using the
browser bundle, and before that Yahoo was my default. DuckDuckGo seems
to be a bit faster than Yahoo, but both work better than Google's almost
constant search failure.
Having a hidden service as the default search might improve
Hi,
I see a lot of scary warnings in the Tor logs on our high bandwidth
nodes (>400 Mbps): "Error binding network socket: Address already in use".
All servers are configured equally, running multiple Tor processes. I
also apply sysctl tweaks, see
http://www.torservers.net/misc/config/sysctl.conf
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 15:53, Mirko <5...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Maxim Kammerer schrieb am 11.01.2012 10:22:58
>
> Are you referring to this (from https://duckduckgo.com/privacy.html)?
Yes, and I didn't know that DuckDuckGo allows turning redirection off
in the settings and via the URL parameters. Refe
Sebastian Hahn schrieb am 10.01.2012 21:24:55
>> 1. Why is Google the default search engine in the TOR browser bundle?
>
> Because it's the default search engine in Firefox
>
>> 2. Does TOR get money from Google
>> a) for using Google as the default search engine?
>
> No.
>
>> b) in general
I just sent a private reply to a posting here. I was surprised that
reply began to compose a message to the list instead of to the
individual sender as it should have, but did notice in time. The
problem of course is the Reply-To: header that points to the list.
I know there are pro and anti li
Hi,
> The reason you are receiving this message is that, to improve our
> study, we require some extra information about the Relay(s) you are
> running that, unfortunately, is not publicly available.
I'm curious how such extra information will improve their study,
if/why knowing such private info
Why not run something like "redsocks" (first hit on transparent socks)
http://darkk.net.ru/redsocks/ on VM1 ? It is a program that sits in between
the proxy and client. You then configure the firewall running on VM1 to
redirect traffic only through redsocks and allow no other connections.
I'd use F
Maxim Kammerer schrieb am 11.01.2012 10:22:58
> However, by keeping that setting you are compromising the privacy
> of the users, since, for instance, Google tracks clicks on the
> returned results (it uses redirecting links). DuckDuckGo does
> that as well. As far as I am able to tell, ixquick do
received the same letter, I guess the reason for not contacting this list
is that the reach is bigger if directly contacting tor relay operators.
Anybody know what new attack he is speaking of ? I'm a bit doubtfull of
giving sys info, even though the info seems harmless with the recently new
devel
Hi!
2012/1/11 Klaus Layer :
> Hi all,
>
> I just received an email about a tor relay survey. Do other tor relay
> operators received the same email? Does anyone know something about this
> survey? I am wondering why this mailing list was not contacted before.
They contacted me aswell, yes. I revi
Hi all,
I just received an email about a tor relay survey. Do other tor relay
operators received the same email? Does anyone know something about this
survey? I am wondering why this mailing list was not contacted before.
Best regards,
Klaus
- original message ---
Dear Tor
Ehlo,
Am 2012-01-11 13:34, schrieb Klaus Layer:
> I just received an email about a tor relay survey. Do other tor relay
> operators received the same email? Does anyone know something about this
> survey? I am wondering why this mailing list was not contacted before.
same email received today a
- Forwarded message from Nick Daly -
From: Nick Daly
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:24:28 -0600
To: freedombox-disc...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: [Freedombox-discuss] Important update to PlugServer Setup Scripts
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
-BEGIN PGP S
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 22:24, Sebastian Hahn wrote:
>> 1. Why is Google the default search engine in the TOR browser bundle?
> Because it's the default search engine in Firefox
The reason Google is the default search engine in Firefox is that
Firefox gets money from Google for putting it as the
23 matches
Mail list logo
