On 12/24/2011 7:27 PM, Koh Choon Lin wrote:
Hi
Is it just me, I realized when I deployed the latest tbb 2.2.35-3 on
Vista machines, the control buttons (minimized, enlarge and close) are
not seen but available. The portion is just a black bar and I can
click on the portion where I would have to
Hi
Is it just me, I realized when I deployed the latest tbb 2.2.35-3 on
Vista machines, the control buttons (minimized, enlarge and close) are
not seen but available. The portion is just a black bar and I can
click on the portion where I would have to guess it's function, eg.
right most is close i
Hi
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 7:29 PM, wrote:
>> For various reasons it sounds like there is a lot of demand for separating
>> Tor from the TBB.
>
> You mean separating Tor Browser from The Tor Browser Bundle (TBB)?
>
> Reasons I see here:
> - using Tor as a transparent proxy
> - wanting a browser
On 12/22/11 4:28 AM, and...@torproject.org wrote:
https://svn.torproject.org/svn/torvm/trunk/doc/design.html.
I realize there are many reasons why a VM-based solution is useful,
compared to a native solution.
However, this statement is incorrect:
"This is important in a Windows environment
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 11:19:36AM -0500, h...@safe-mail.net wrote 1.0K bytes
in 16 lines about:
: Damn it! That's really bad...
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/effs-panopticlick-and-torbutton
--
Andrew
http://tpo.is/contact
pgp 0x74ED336B
___
tor-ta
Hi,
slightly OT: among people interested in these matters, maybe one of
a few would want to test and research evercookies?
--> https://tails.boum.org/todo/Fight_evercookies/
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ ht
> Can anyone using a particular hardened browser post their panopticlick data?
> http://panopticlick.eff.org
Damn it! That's really bad...
I am thankful about this test site. It's public knowledge. As I imagine the
leading companies may have an increased interest in tracking people who turn
off
Thank you for this, but I still cannot get it on my windows 7 browser
via aurora.
I also have an ASUS eeepad with android 3 and have downloaded and
installed orbot, gibberbot and orweb. I have followed all the
instructions to do this, but my orweb keeps telling me I am not
connected to tor, tho
Nope, it will just start another instance of TBB but
with error that Tor is already running.
Orionjur Tor-admin wrote:
> On 23.12.2011 19:58, Greg Kalitnikoff wrote:
> > Hi. Assuming I have some modern Linux distro and run TBB as separate
> > user, can I somehow open links from other apps (such
>> For various reasons it sounds like there is a lot of demand for
>> separating
>> Tor from the TBB.
>
> You mean separating Tor Browser from The Tor Browser Bundle (TBB)?
>
> Reasons I see here:
> - using Tor as a transparent proxy
> - wanting a browser with best privacy settings but without usin
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 06:29:36AM -0500, h...@safe-mail.net wrote:
> > For various reasons it sounds like there is a lot of demand for separating
> > Tor from the TBB.
>
> You mean separating Tor Browser from The Tor Browser Bundle (TBB)?
>
> Reasons I see here:
> - using Tor as a transparent pr
> For various reasons it sounds like there is a lot of demand for separating
> Tor from the TBB.
You mean separating Tor Browser from The Tor Browser Bundle (TBB)?
Reasons I see here:
- using Tor as a transparent proxy
- wanting a browser with best privacy settings but without using the Tor netwo
> Hi
>
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 9:49 PM, wrote:
> > Is it possible to adjust the Tor Browser for use without Tor?
>
> I am looking for such a solution too. On Windows, you can use portable
> Firefox and install the extensions.
No, even on Windows you can't just install extensions. The Tor Br
Hi
> Firefox Nightly and Firefox UX are both available as portables I believe.
>
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Koh Choon Lin <2choon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 9:49 PM, wrote:
>>> Is it possible to adjust the Tor Browser for use without Tor?
Do you mean the ZI
>>> to put one in someday, we'll make it obvious and loud that it is so.
>> No Backdoors. No bugdoors. No so-called "lawful interception" systems.
Court orders and duress can be applied to anyone who is
reachable by them. The only real solution should that happen
is to take things underground on T
> PHASE-4: Full Public Disclosure
I would strongly object to publishing any data that is node
specific/identifiable. Admins deal with background traffic
and pro crackers every day. But we don't need people
throwing up targets for the sort of chantards that inhabit
Tor to simply launch their useless
16 matches
Mail list logo
