On 2011-04-25 02:54, cmeclax-sazri wrote:
> When two people talk to each other with TorChat, each connects to a hidden
> service set up by the other. This often takes about a minute.
This is normal timeout. I use TorChat 0.9.9.534 with Tor v0.2.2.24-alpha
on Ubuntu 10.04 and it works very well.
When two people talk to each other with TorChat, each connects to a hidden
service set up by the other. This often takes about a minute. What are the
steps in setting up and connecting to a hidden service, and how long does
each take?
cmeclax
___
tor-
On Sunday 24 April 2011 20:24:07 tagnaq wrote:
> On 2011-01-29 Alice decides to create a new example.com account
> (al...@example.com) using her home IP address - the same as her Tor node
> is using [86.59.30.36] . (Alice is not using Tor for browsing the web
> but she uses Torbutton in Transparent
On 04/25/2011 01:11 AM, and...@torproject.org wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 03:55:59PM -0400, grarp...@gmail.com wrote 1.4K bytes
> in 25 lines about:
> : > If you run a Tor node at your home IP address you will loose the
> : > positive side effect of a dynamic IP address and your IP layer anon
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/firefox-4-tor-browser-bundle-windows
You can download here:
https://www.torproject.org/dist/torbrowser/tor-browser-2.2.24-1-alpha_en-US.exe
https://www.torproject.org/dist/torbrowser/tor-browser-2.2.24-1-alpha_en-US.exe.asc
The build infrastructure has moved to a
On 04/24/2011 07:18 PM, tagnaq wrote:
> Even the fact that you are running a tor node is sensitive information
> because this reduces your anonymity set from on out of ~2^32 to one out
> of 2^32 ;)
correction:
[...] reduces your anonymity set from on out of ~2^32 to one out
of <2500.
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 03:22:41AM -0400, grarp...@gmail.com wrote 0.5K bytes
in 15 lines about:
: Are any of these official? Are there others?
: Note some of the other interesting groups linked from these pages.
: And of course... +1 :)
:
: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=29572092848
: htt
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 03:55:59PM -0400, grarp...@gmail.com wrote 1.4K bytes
in 25 lines about:
: > If you run a Tor node at your home IP address you will loose the
: > positive side effect of a dynamic IP address and your IP layer anonymity
: > decreases to that of a static IP address because yo
On Sunday 24 April 2011 15:55:59 grarpamp wrote:
> For those users who do, by whatever means, end up with a different IP
> address each time they go online, and who wish to avoid tracking across
> said IP changes by regenerating their Tor keys each time... what is the
> minimum recommended time tha
* Javier Bassi [2011:04:24 16:56 -0300]:
> Also now you must verify your cel via SMS in order to create an
> account. (also facebook added this). They just can't process that some
> of us don't have celphones.
I tested this through a couple of exit nodes and it seems to only happen on the
non-US
FYI, while looking around for mail providers I found this
useful coverage of some of them on The Hidden Wiki:
http://kpvz7ki2v5agwt35.onion/wiki/index.php/Email
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/m
Also now you must verify your cel via SMS in order to create an
account. (also facebook added this). They just can't process that some
of us don't have celphones.
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 4:04 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> Got this new militant full screen at login today. Used to be
> only a popup naggin
> If you run a Tor node at your home IP address you will loose the
> positive side effect of a dynamic IP address and your IP layer anonymity
> decreases to that of a static IP address because your node identity
> links all your public IP addresses.
Many (most) residential ISP's allocate their use
Got this new militant full screen at login today. Used to be
only a popup nagging.
Never mind that the password is locally backed up and encrypted.
Nor that SSL is in use preventing, ooo, hijacking, lol :)
Somehow I suspect those of us having legacy accounts
and refusing to link a phone number to t
the original subject was
"reducing the negative anonymity impact for Tor node operators running
nodes at home" but then I thought it is a bit to long for a subject line :)
As a tor user you gain anonymity - as a Tor node operator you loose
anonymity.
I would call this a valid statement under cer
15 matches
Mail list logo
