Hi all,
I can use the following command to obtain the exit list for my ip:
https://check.torproject.org/cgi-bin/TorBulkExitList.py?ip=222.75.27.212
But, on the webpage:
https://check.torproject.org/cgi-bin/TorBulkExitList.py, I can find the
following instructions:
---
If you
Hello Everyone,
I'v submitted my first GSOC proposal to the Google Melange site. It is
proposing an update of TorStatus to work with Metrics. I am aware that
this may not be the highest priority for the community so I plan to
submit an alternate proposal too.
I would greatly appreciate any feedba
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Aaron wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 8:38 PM, grarpamp wrote:
>>> If you must have GMail, I've noticed that accounts created on android
>>> devices are not subject to these checks. And yes, even when using Tor
>>> via Orbot.
>>
>> Since using your android is, afa
On Apr 6, 2011 4:42 PM, "grarpamp" wrote:
>
> > I do think it's ridiculous to need a phone to get a webmail
> > account.
>
> I just don't like their apparent stance requiring SMS/voice auth.
>
> > What I don't understand is hating on Google but still wanting to
> > use their webmail service.
>
> A
> I can confirm that www.geocaching.com, www.waymarking.com, and
> www.wherigo.com have been abused by someone using Tor. They are currently
> investigating the abuse and attempting to bring legal action against
> abusers, so that is likely the reason for a potential block.
Well I do hope that tho
> I usually require https (creation and management), imaps (retrieval),
> smtps/submission (sending), no automatic addition of addresses
> to 'contact' lists when sent via web or smtp, and an outright account
> deletion function.
I meant to include with this: no inclusion of source IP/FQDN in the
> I do think it's ridiculous to need a phone to get a webmail
> account.
I just don't like their apparent stance requiring SMS/voice auth.
> What I don't understand is hating on Google but still wanting to
> use their webmail service.
As mentioned earlier, it's a perception thing. And of course
I can confirm that www.geocaching.com, www.waymarking.com, and www.wherigo.com
have been abused by someone using Tor. They are currently investigating the
abuse and attempting to bring legal action against abusers, so that is likely
the reason for a potential block.
All the best,
Joel Knighton
> OKCupid doesn't allow you to log in. The error is "password invalid".
I can confirm as of last weekend that OKCupid does in fact allow
all functions from account creation, to usage, to deletion, via Tor.
HOWEVER, on depending on the exit, you will be outright blocked
from the site and presented
> If you'd like to dig in
> further then I'd suggest giving arm a shot [1][2]
> [1] http://www.atagar.com/arm/
> [2] http://www.atagar.com/transfer/tmp/armScreenshot-1.4.2.png
Holy shit! This looks cool :) Definitely going to check it out. Thanks!
I can't speak for anyone else or torproject, but
On 06.04.2011 22:54, Aaron wrote:
> If you need a throwaway number for SMS there are a number of VOIP
> services that might be useful and could probably be purchased using a
> prepay card if you want to do it anonymously.
OT: I have recently registered a VOIP number and mistakenly entered the
wron
One thing you could test is adding your existing google account (one
pending SMS verification) to the android emulator and see if that has
any effect. It's pretty much the same process I outlined before,
except hit the 'add existing' option rather than 'create new'
--Aaron
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at
The workaround is for creating new accounts; not for receiving SMS
verification of existing accounts (unfortunately).
If you need a throwaway number for SMS there are a number of VOIP
services that might be useful and could probably be purchased using a
prepay card if you want to do it anonymously
I have the SDK installed and have run an emulator...not sure what to do with it
though. I cannot transmit messages (or anything) and cannot receive anything
(to what number would it go to in any case?).
praedor
On Wednesday, April 06, 2011 01:00:42 pm Orionjur Tor-admin wrote:
> On 06.04.2011
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 8:38 PM, grarpamp wrote:
>> If you must have GMail, I've noticed that accounts created on android
>> devices are not subject to these checks. And yes, even when using Tor
>> via Orbot.
>
> Since using your android is, afaik, the same as giving them your
> phone (SMS), or alt
Håken Hveem wrote (06 Apr 2011 12:00:57 GMT) :
> To me, it looks like that the slower network rate of Tor will cause
> problems for SIP and VOIP applications.
Doable, see this thread in the list archive:
http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/Dec-2010/msg00147.html
Bye,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Orionjur Tor-admin
wrote:
> On 06.04.2011 08:40, Moritz Bartl wrote:
>> On 06.04.2011 10:12, grarpamp wrote:
It would be nice to know how exactly the AVD is transmitted. I guess you
could then easily fake the value without having to install the SDK.
>>> AV
On 06.04.2011 13:37, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
> Just a quick note...a nice, safe, easily anonymized email account can be had
> at safe-mail.net. No hoops to jump through, tor friendly.
>
>
I know and sometimes use it for some purposes. But they give their
users only 3 Mb and they let use their
On 06.04.2011 13:28, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
> Could you elaborate a bit on this? After this discussion I went ahead and
> tried to create another anonymous gmail account and ran into the "requires
> SMS" hitch as discussed (and there is no option that I can see to bypass this
> via other mean
Are you basing this off connection results (netstat, lsof, ss, etc)?
If so, you're probably being confused by directory fetches which are
done over 1-hop circuits to directory mirrors. If you'd like to dig in
further then I'd suggest giving arm a shot [1][2] - this will attempt
to correlate the con
On 06.04.2011 12:00, Håken Hveem wrote:
>
> To me, it looks like that the slower network rate of Tor will cause
> problems for SIP and VOIP applications.
>
> Will it be possible to specify a set of port ranges so traffic on those
> ports will not be routed to the Tor network ?
>
> A example :
>
I decided to check if the StrictEntryNodes and EntryNodes functions worked,
so I started to log my TOR connections.
They did work, and TOR connects to the entry nodes specified, but TOR also
connects to other nodes now and then while running. If you specify your own
entry nodes, shouldn't TOR o
On 4/5/2011 11:10 PM, grarpamp wrote:
What if you don't have a phone # to give them (or don't want to) - they
just don't let you create an acct?
In my tests to date (limited by free time), yes, that's what I said.
FYI - I tried GMX w/ Tor couple days ago - worked just fine.
Yes, free alternat
Just a quick note...a nice, safe, easily anonymized email account can be had at
safe-mail.net. No hoops to jump through, tor friendly.
On Tuesday, April 05, 2011 01:52:31 am grarpamp wrote:
> >> >Google requires you to be able to receive a text message or phone call to
> >> >use a GMail accoun
Could you elaborate a bit on this? After this discussion I went ahead and
tried to create another anonymous gmail account and ran into the "requires SMS"
hitch as discussed (and there is no option that I can see to bypass this via
other means as others have described)
I have no idea what @your
To me, it looks like that the slower network rate of Tor will cause
problems for SIP and VOIP applications.
Will it be possible to specify a set of port ranges so traffic on those
ports will not be routed to the Tor network ?
A example :
Telios VOIP solution uses ports 5060 to 5061(TLS) (udp/tc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OKCupid doesn't allow you to log in. The error is "password invalid".
Geocaching.com allows you to login and browse, but when posting
something, or registering a new found/not found, etc., you get a "non
anonymous proxies allowed". This is a very rece
On 06.04.2011 08:40, Moritz Bartl wrote:
> On 06.04.2011 10:12, grarpamp wrote:
>>> It would be nice to know how exactly the AVD is transmitted. I guess you
>>> could then easily fake the value without having to install the SDK.
>> AVD (android virtual device)... sounds like a virtualbox instance.
On 06.04.2011 10:12, grarpamp wrote:
>> It would be nice to know how exactly the AVD is transmitted. I guess you
>> could then easily fake the value without having to install the SDK.
> AVD (android virtual device)... sounds like a virtualbox instance.
> I don't believer it's 'transmitted' anywhere
>>> 1. Install the android sdk/emulator and create an avd. I tested with
>>> API 8 (android 2.2) + google apis
>> Where can I get the android sdk/emulator ?
http://developer.android.com/
> It would be nice to know how exactly the AVD is transmitted. I guess you
> could then easily fake the value
30 matches
Mail list logo
