On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 10:32:40 +0200
"Dimitris T. via tor-relays"
allegedly wrote:
> another abuse report from hetzner (by the same watchdogcyberdefence)
> a few hours ago. no reply from hetzner yet to previous ticket.
>
> this time, alleged attacked /20 subnet from watchdogcyberdefence was
> fir
Update for my experience with OVH.
Received 4 abuse emails in total (2 per each relay), each was replied
within 24h. No followup on any or response.
Still have service uninterrupted.
Hopefully the attacker's ISP kicks them off instead. All of the honeypot
that send "incorrect" abuse emails ge
another abuse report from hetzner (by the same watchdogcyberdefence) a
few hours ago. no reply from hetzner yet to previous ticket.
this time, alleged attacked /20 subnet from watchdogcyberdefence was
firewalled since 30/10/2024, just to confirm new false abuse reports...,
and they confirmed
Taking some answers from a reply to a different user:
The BCM2712 SoC microcontroller has a base frequency 1,5 GhZ with 4 cores and 4
threads, but most importantly, it also supports openSSL hardware acceleration,
with up to 42 times faster AES speeds.
Also, regarding the "I'll just do this at h
On Monday, November 4th, 2024 at 04:33, Keifer Bly wrote:
> So I am wondering, is a Raspberry Pi 4 a recommended device to run a tor
> relay on? In terms of traffic load, etc? Thanks.
It's not powerful, but it certainly works, and if you have one around you can
set it up and leave it alone unt
Thanks all.
--Keifer
On Mon, Nov 4, 2024, 5:38 AM David Goulet wrote:
> On 01 Nov (18:15:13), Keifer Bly wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > So I am wondering, is a Raspberry Pi 4 a recommended device to run a tor
> > relay on? In terms of traffic load, etc? Thanks.
>
> Greetings,
>
> For a while, Pies were
