the vertical white lines periods where a consensus wasn’t reached?
Yes, there are some missing hours in the input files.
David Fifield
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
"That's crazily non-compliant. Closing connection.");
connection_or_close_for_error(chan->conn, 0);
return;
}
David Fifield
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
* 2;
connection_or_write_var_cell_to_buf(cell, conn);
conn->handshake_state->sent_versions_at = time(NULL);
var_cell_free(cell);
return 0;
}
> Are you sure you are deduplicating correctly? That's a lot of hosts.
Even if it were only GFW probing, GFW rarely uses duplicate IPs, excep
Just wanted to remind you that the regular biweekly pluggable transports
meeting is going to occur tomorrow at 16:00 UTC. Place is the #tor-dev
IRC channel in the OFTC network.
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/PluggableTransports#PluggableTransportIRCmeetings
David Fifield
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 02:29:28PM +0100, Philipp Winter wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 08:24:58PM +0100, Tom van der Woerdt wrote:
> > Interestingly, that paints a completely different picture. I added
> > that line to two machines (guard+exit) and after a few minutes :
> >
> > # cat /var/lib/t
On Sat, Dec 06, 2014 at 02:57:19PM -0800, David Fifield wrote:
> What's a good way to inform support of issues that users might run into?
> Should I just send email to h...@rt.torproject.org, or is there a better
> way?
>
> I was thinking about this today because meek is bro
: between 2 and 10 weeks.
Does anyone know information that could tighten up the bounds, a date
between December 2 and February 1 when obfs4 bridges were known to be
either accessible or inaccessible?
David Fifield
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev
e EC2 instance that crunches numbers for
> user stats. But thanks for asking!
Karsten, could I ask you to manually update the graph once more? I would
like to include the numbers in the next monthly meek report.
David Fifield
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
. Setting up meek-server on your own bridge is more
involved, but not more than other pluggable transports.
David Fifield
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
ptable:
https://gitweb.torproject.org/pluggable-transports/meek.git/tree/meek-client/meek-client.go?id=0.15#n321
David Fifield
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 03:22:38AM -0500, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 12:08:10AM -0800, David Fifield wrote:
> > An upstream HTTP proxy should work, either through torrc HTTPProxy or
> > the --proxy option.
>
> Careful! The torrc "HTTPProxy"
would have to reconstruct a stream in
order to detect anomalies. Could a censor acting as an ordinary peer
detect them more easily, just by participating in the file transfer?
(I'm thinking of how the movie studios would run their own BitTorrent
clients in order to find other downloaders.)
weird, but not entirely
dissimilar to obfs3.
https://wiki.vuze.com/w/Message_Stream_Encryption
http://www.tcs.hut.fi/Publications/bbrumley/nordsec08_brumley_valkonen.pdf
David Fifield
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https
27;s
useless. It's a question of motivation, and technical capability, and
resources, all of which vary under different censors. BitTorrent is
interesting because I would guess, at least in the U.S., that you're
more likely to get blocked by your ISP than by a firewall further out.
David Fifield
it?
(And if you have a bootstrapping step that cannot be easily blocked, why
not use it for *all* your communication, not just bootstrapping?)
David Fifield
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 06:30:09PM +0100, Griffin Boyce wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I was just wondering if it's possible to get a gpg-signed list of sha256
> checksums for the Tor Browser. The website only shows the current version's
> list of hashes. Which is really useful, but it would be great t
a log. The xfvb idea is really clever.
Someone asked this question on Tor Stack Exchange:
https://tor.stackexchange.com/questions/3620/how-to-install-tor-with-meek-support-on-ubuntu-debian
Seems like this package will soon be the answer?
I'll suggest the meek-client-wrapper program from #
47 GB $5.53
2014-10 298 GB $35.04
2014-11 500 GB $58.80
2014-12 512 GB $60.21
2015-01 638 GB $75.03
2015-02 614 GB $72.21
https://globe.torproject.org/#/bridge/AA033EEB61601B2B7312D89B62AAA23DC3ED8A34
David Fifield
___
tor-dev mailing l
ly model is our observation
that some jurisdictions exhibit weekly patterns. A 'previous day' model
would then raise alarms every time weekly patterns emerge"
David Fifield
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:41:55PM +0100, Philipp Winter wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 06:09:00PM -0700, David Fifield wrote:
> > You can eyeball more examples in the omni-graph:
> > https://people.torproject.org/~dcf/graphs/relays-all.pdf
>
> That's a really use
ke sense to say, "activate all
of them."
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2013-December/005966.html
Let's just drop this part of the spec, and delete some underspecified
and unused code?
David Fifield
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
rts? I would like to add a guide to
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/meek#Quickstart and
instructions to
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/PluggableTransports#Howtousepluggabletransports
.
Or do you have such a guide I can just link to?
David F
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 08:41:20AM -0700, David Fifield wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 02:02:42PM +0100, Ximin Luo wrote:
> > On 18/09/14 03:31, David Fifield wrote:
> > > Currently in the bundles we're not setting a bridge fingerprint, so
> > > rel
15-03-14 or 2014-03-25, which
fall roughly where the user increase is on the metrics graphs. Maybe
they were recently rebooted with support for the websocket transport.
David Fifield
{"nickname":"ashrak","hashed_fingerprint":"F1C465D38F18091F6FED9CAC924DA50F2813C0AE
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:01:31PM -0700, David Fifield wrote:
> It's possible that the new websocket users are using one of these other
> bridges. It's also possible, since the bridges run more than one
> transport, that the users are actually using some other transport, and
&g
In an effort to improve pluggable transports' visual identity, we should
introduce a line of stuffed animals. The only rule that the the animal's
name has to be made out of the transport name.
The meek meerkat! [1]
The obfs blobfish! [2]
The FTE eft! [3]
The flash proxy banded quail (Philortyx fas
David Fifield
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
go build -ldflags '-s'
https://gitweb.torproject.org/builders/tor-browser-bundle.git/tree/gitian/descriptors/linux/gitian-pluggable-transports.yml?id=d4e10e98af5237ed21796a4d48c3e09db6994959#n209
Check discussion here:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/12649
David Fi
commands. I added a link to it in
the Child's Garden of Pluggable Transports.
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/AChildsGardenOfPluggableTransports#Castle
Feel free to edit it and add what you like. I think it would be great to
have an exampl
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 12:50:52AM -0400, Griffin Boyce wrote:
> Both populations also have a large number of speakers: ~300M for Hindi
> and ~66M for Urdu.
I was really surprised; Hindi is the third-most spoken language in the
world, trailing only Mandarin and English. Of the top 10 languages i
file size of additional packages. But
see:
Support a multi-lingual TBB that can switch between localizations
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/12967
David Fifield
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torpro
The latest meek user graph shows two recent large increases. The first
increase from 2000 to 3000 is around April 9. The second from 3000 to
5000 is all on April 15. The first increase makes sense; it corresponds
with the removal of a bottleneck on meek-azure:
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 06:22:47PM -0700, Mike Perry wrote:
> David Fifield:
> > Here's the summary of meek's CDN fees for April 2015.
> >
> > total by CDN $3292.25 + $3792.79 + $0.00 = $7085.04 grand total
> > https://metrics.torproject.org/userstats-bridge-
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 11:04:58PM -0400, Griffin Boyce wrote:
> Mike Perry wrote:
> >David Fifield:
> >>Here's the summary of meek's CDN fees for April 2015.
> >>
> >>total by CDN $3292.25 + $3792.79 + $0.00 = $7085.04 grand total
>
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 04:36:48AM +, isis wrote:
> But just to be clear — since it sounds like you've asked for several new
> things in that last paragraph :) — which do you want:
>
> 1. Tor Browser users use meek to get to BridgeDB, to get non-meek bridges
> by:
>1.a. Retrieving a
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 11:56:36AM -0700, Arthur D. Edelstein wrote:
> > Amazon sucks and they don't have any automatic way to shut down a
> > service. I emailed them and they were very clear about that. The best
> > you can do is set up an email alert at different cost threshold (which I
> > have
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 12:56:04PM -0700, Arthur D. Edelstein wrote:
> Maybe you could rig up something that shuts down the instance? Or does
> Amazon charge you even then?
That might work. I found some documentation on an API for CloudFront web
distributions:
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonClo
I and my colleagues at Berkeley, Lantern, and Psiphon wrote a paper on
domain fronting, the censorship circumvention technology that underlies
the meek pluggable transport among other systems. It's going to appear
at the PET Symposium on June 30, 2015. If you've been following along,
you know most
I'm trying to use CollecTor data to find out how much bandwidth is
offered by different pluggable transports over time. I.e., I want to be
able to say something like, "On July 1, bridges with obfs3 offered X MB/s,
bridges with obfs4 offered Y MB/s," etc. To do this, I'm mapping through
three types
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 11:39:54PM -0400, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> > It seems rare that the bridge-server-descriptor is missing. In the
> > 2015-07 tarball, it happened for 5891/477496 relays (1.2%).
> [snip]
> > How do you handle cases like this? I had a browse through the Onionoo
> > source code
I made some graphs that show the count and total bandwidth of all
bridges, broken down by transport.
https://people.torproject.org/~dcf/graphs/pt-bandwidth-2015-07-11/pt-bandwidth.png
https://people.torproject.org/~dcf/graphs/pt-bandwidth-2015-07-11/pt-count.png
The top part of th
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 12:18:07PM -0700, David Fifield wrote:
> I made some graphs that show the count and total bandwidth of all
> bridges, broken down by transport.
>
> https://people.torproject.org/~dcf/graphs/pt-bandwidth-2015-07-11/pt-bandwidth.png
>
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 02:27:10PM +0200, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> The new version 2.5 that I deployed this week adds the optional
> "measured" field to details documents. The main idea behind this new
> field is that relay operators and Tor network debuggers can now figure
> out easily whether a
My presentation on domain fronting (the meek pluggable transport in
Tor), which I gave at PETS 2015 on June 30, 2015, is online. This page
has the video and a copy of the slides. It is about 17 minutes long.
https://www.bamsoftware.com/talks/fronting-pets2015/
Here is the paper on which the talk
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:52:22AM +1000, Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote:
> To proceed with the patch, we need to know / decide:
>
> What is the range of compression ratios on recent microdescriptors and
> microdescriptor consensuses? Do they vary much?
> (Does someone have an archive somewhere?)
Someone IRL asked me about mirrored downloads of Tor Browser on services
like GitHub. I know that such services are planned (or already
implemented?) for GetTor, and I know about these tickets:
Integrate cloud services that are not blocked in mainland China
https://bugs.torproject.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:07:17PM -0300, ilv wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> >
> > My question is, is there a static URL on GitHub or similar that has the
> > latest downloads? That is, one that people can access even without
> > having used GetTor? Such a URL would be more useful than a typical
> > mirr
On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 11:26:16PM +, Jeremy Rand wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> I was looking at the Gitian descriptor for the pluggable transports at
> https://gitweb.torproject.org/builders/tor-browser-bundle.git/tree/gitia
> n/descriptors/windows/gitian-plug
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 03:33:24PM -0400, Brandon Wiley wrote:
> I am in favor of standardizing on the Go codebase for pluggable transports
> that
> ship with Tor. This is something we talked about at the last developer
> meeting.
> The reason I favor this is not for reproducible build reasons, b
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 08:55:33PM +0800, Li Xiaodong wrote:
> Hello, I am a Tor Browser user in China. Currently, many obfs4 bridges are
> blocked by China's firewall. When will SkypeMorph Pluggable Transports and
> Dust Pluggable Transports be deployed in Tor Browser? There are no directory
> ser
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 12:05:49AM +0800, Li Xiaodong wrote:
> Hello, thank you very much for your help. I really appreciate it. In this
> afternoon of China Time, I found a obfs4 bridge which is usable in China. The
> speed of Tor Browser connecting with obfs4 bridge, and the speed of Tor
> Brows
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 10:06:00AM +1100, Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This morning I observed a “free wifi” network blocking tor’s SSL connections.
> While other SSL connections from my machine went through, I observed multiple
> network traces of tor completing a TCP 3-way handsh
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 07:06:05PM +, Virgil Griffith wrote:
> I met with some CDNs today and they have expressed interest in doing meek for
> us.
>
> Is there someone at Tor Project I can forward the CDNs to who are more serious
> about hosting meek?
Sending them to me (da...@bamsoftware.com
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 09:31:38PM +0200, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi devs,
>
> I just finished a redesign of the CollecTor website and would
> appreciate your feedback:
>
> https://metrics.torproject.org/index2.html
This URL is 404 for me.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:53:15PM +0800, Li Xiaodong wrote:
> Hello, after about one hour since my Tor browser successfully connected to Tor
> network with a obfs4 bridge, I couldn't open any webpage through Tor proxy.
> But
> after I restarted my Tor browser, Tor browser can work normally again.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 03:44:59PM +0800, Da Feng wrote:
> Hi:
>I've discovered that the GFW normally doesn't block https
> protocols. We can use a https front tier to distribute connections to
> actual bridges.
This is a good idea. HTTPS is a good cover protocol.
> The front tier encrypts an
On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 08:29:19PM -0500, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 12:13:45AM +, bo...@torproject.org wrote:
> > commit 7a1c6fd121dd001eb999ef03ebbbed264da37026
> > Author: Nicolas Vigier
> > Date: Sat Nov 7 00:45:48 2015 +0100
> >
> > Bug 17492: Include default
Here's the summary of meek's CDN fees for October 2015.
App Engine + Amazon + Azure = total by month
February 2014$0.09 + -- + -- = $0.09
March 2014 $0.00 + -- + -- = $0.00
April 2014 $0.73 + -- + -- = $0.73
May 2014
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 05:50:51PM -0600, Tom Ritter wrote:
> On 18 November 2015 at 16:32, David Fifield wrote:
> > There was an unfortunate outage of meek-amazon (not the result of
> > censorship, just operations failure). Between 30 September and 9 October
> > the bridge
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 01:38:56PM -0500, David Goulet wrote:
> Anyway, if you think this algorithm could be improved, please respond. If you
> think this algorithm is wrong, please respond. If you can reproduce the result
> on your own with this algo, omg please respond! :) The above could be tota
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:51:23PM -0500, Philipp Winter wrote:
> I spent some time improving the existing relay uptime visualisation [0].
> Inspired by a research paper [1], the new algorithm uses single-linkage
> clustering with Pearson's correlation coefficient as distance function.
> The idea i
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 10:47:08AM +1100, Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote:
>
> On 8 Dec 2015, at 10:43, Tom Ritter <[1]t...@ritter.vg> wrote:
>
> On 7 December 2015 at 13:51, Philipp Winter <[2]p...@nymity.ch> wrote:
>
> I spent some time improving the existing relay uptime visuali
t
> serices, so blocking them is not an option and having them behind TLS
> makes it even more complicated.
>
> The problem I noticed though is that the costs of Meek go up and if I
> read the reports from David Fifield (the maintainer of Meek), the
> bandwidth has to be li
On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 11:01:25PM -0600, Jeremy Rand wrote:
> I noticed that it looks like Tor Project is using Go 1.4.2 to build
> the pluggable transports in Gitian. I'm curious why a newer version
> of Go isn't used. My understanding is that Go 1.4.2 (or earlier) is
> needed to build Go 1.5 b
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 01:19:22PM -0900, Jesse V wrote:
> On 01/11/2016 12:47 PM, David Fifield wrote:
> > December 2015 $561.29 + $603.27 + $172.60 = $1337.16
> > ...
> > The number of users increased by about 1,000 in December 2015.
>
> Thanks for the report
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 02:51:12PM -0900, Jesse V wrote:
> On 01/11/2016 02:42 PM, David Fifield wrote:
> > We still have support from
> > Google, so that $561.29 actually costs about $61.29.
>
> Oh, I was not aware of this. When does the support expire, and how much
> wo
I wanted to know how many exits exit from an address that is different
from their OR address. The answer is about 10.7%, 109/1018 exits. The
interesting part is that of those 109 mismatches, 87 have an exit
address that differs from the OR address in all four octets; i.e., the
IP addresses used by
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 07:21:39AM +, John wrote:
> I ran into the technical report from George Danezis about an
> anomaly-based censorship-detection system for Tor. I have a few
> questions that I hope you can help me with.
>
> Is there an implementation available of the approach described in
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 11:49:19PM +, John wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Thank you, these pointers were very helpful. Do you know if there is
> some kind of resource that lists known censorship events? I'd like to
> see how good the approach from the paper does at identifying them.
For Tor-specific
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 10:24:47PM +, cacahuatl wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 01:01:03PM +0100, coderman wrote:
> > misguided because it won't work as you expect, the right way to check
> > is to build circuits and see where they exit from. you can do this
> > yourself!
>
> Tor Project alrea
Does Orbot have a list of default built-in obfs4 bridges? Or do users
fetch them dynamically? I looked in the source code and found default
meek bridges but not default obfs4.
I'm asking because we recently added a few new high-capacity default
obfs4 bridges.
https://bugs.torproject.org/18
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 03:29:38PM -0500, Nathan Freitas wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016, at 02:52 PM, David Fifield wrote:
> > Does Orbot have a list of default built-in obfs4 bridges? Or do users
> > fetch them dynamically? I looked in the source code and found default
> &
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 02:34:42PM -0800, Serene wrote:
> Snowflake is a webrtc pluggable transport inspired by flashproxy.
> (https://gitweb.torproject.org/pluggable-transports/snowflake.git)
> Arlo, David, and I have made lots of progress on it lately, and it now
> appears to have reached minimum
On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 03:44:35PM +, Nathan Bliss wrote:
> Is there a way to configure a bridge in tor (e.g. meek) via the config files
> from the command line without having to use the GUI in the Tor browser? I've
> been searching for documentation on this, so if I've missed it I would be
> g
I decided to move the meek cost emails to the tor-project list, because
they are more project-y than dev-y. Here is the email for January 2016:
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-project/2016-February/000101.html
There's a table of all previous summaries here:
https://trac.torproject.org
During the OONI survey to find instances of server-side Tor blocking, we
found a few variations on CloudFlare captcha pages. They don't all say
"Attention Required!". Apparently there is an option to customize the
page, but few sites make use of it. Here are the regexes we used
(excerpted from http
I'm looking for ideas of good ways to handle TLS certificates and their
renewal for meek bridges. I want to use Let's Encrypt for this process,
and I hope that someone who knows Let's Encrypt well can contribute some
ideas.
All three of the meek bridges use HTTPS to receive connections from the
CD
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 12:04:45AM -0400, Mike Tigas wrote:
> [again, cross-posted to tor-dev and guardian-dev.]
>
> A quick status report on this: it works! Hit a big epiphany, figured out
> how to get `gomobile` to emit the necessary bits, then went wild.
>
> Some example stdout from Onion Brow
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 05:28:45PM -0700, George Tankersley wrote:
> > I'm looking for ideas of good ways to handle TLS certificates and their
> > renewal for meek bridges. I want to use Let's Encrypt for this process,
> > and I hope that someone who knows Let's Encrypt well can contribute some
> >
I saw you say on IRC that you had an idea for improving the efficiency
of meek-server. What's your idea? The server hosting meek-azure is
passing 90% CPU at times.
One idea I've seen is using one connection for upstream data
(data-carrying POSTs, emptry responses), and one connection for
downstrea
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 06:30:03AM +, Yawning Angel wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Apr 2016 22:02:23 -0700
> David Fifield wrote:
>
> > I saw you say on IRC that you had an idea for improving the efficiency
> > of meek-server. What's your idea? The server hosting meek-azure
On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 09:23:20PM +, William Waites wrote:
>
> Blake Hadley writes:
> >
> > The environment requires an HTTPS proxy to reach the World Web Web.
> >
> > Do HTTP proxies inherently create a situation similar to MITM?
>
> Yes, that is exactly what they do. If your web browser i
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 06:06:18PM +, Yawning Angel wrote:
> I'll probably add support for other (user-configurable?) cached content
> providers when I have time. The archive.is person doesn't seem to want
> to respond to e-mail, so asking them to optionally not set X-F-F, seems
> like it'll g
https://en.greatfire.org/blog/2016/jul/greatfireorg-now-testing-vpn-speed-and-stability-china
https://cc.greatfire.org/en
"Our newest website, Circumvention Central (CC), aims to provide
real-time information and data about circumvention solutions
that work in China. Since 2
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 01:42:38AM +, Liu, Zhuotao wrote:
> This is Sky from University of Illinois. Currently we are working on research
> project related with Tor.
>
> To help us to better design and evaluation our proposal, we need some
> information about the Tor relays that is currently
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 04:46:45AM +, Liu, Zhuotao wrote:
> Thanks for that info, David. That seems valuable to me. :)
>
> However, I am a bit confused about the definition
>
> "cell-circuits-per-decile": Mean number of circuits that are included in any
> of the deciles,
> rounded up to t
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 10:28:26PM +0530, AKASH DAS wrote:
> Can I know the issues that are currently in https everywhere.
I don't know if this is what you're looking for, but here are some open
bug tracker tickets.
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/query?status=!closed&component=HTTPS+Eve
Here's an idea for a new pluggable transport. It's just a TLS tunnel,
but with a twist that allows the server's certificate to be omitted,
depriving the censor of many classification features, such as whether
the certificate is signed by a CA, the certificate's lifetime, and
whether the commonName
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 04:13:00PM +, Georg Koppen wrote:
> Here are the graphs showing initial downloads, update pings and update
> requests over time:
>
> https://people.torproject.org/~karsten/volatile/torbrowser-annotated-2016-09-11.pdf
>
> The update pings are made by Tor Browser instanc
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:12:15AM -0400, Mark Smith wrote:
> On 9/11/16 3:45 PM, David Fifield wrote:
> >> * We don't know what (8) or (9) is but it seems to us we are losing
> >> users over time and are only getting them back slowly if at all. A
> >> weekday/
https://blog.uproxy.org/2016/09/uproxy-adds-tor-support.html
This blog post says that uProxy gained support for proxying others'
traffic through Tor.
uProxy client → censor → uProxy server → Tor → destination
In the classic uProxy deployment scenario, the client and server are
people who know ea
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 04:06:51PM -0400, George Kadianakis wrote:
>In particular, onion addresses are currently composed of 16 random base32
>characters, and they look like this:
>
> 3g2upl4pq6kufc4m.onion
> vwakviie2ienjx7t.onion
>
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:35:16PM +0200, ban...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> On 2016-10-17 10:24, isis agora lovecruft wrote:
> >
> > You're planning to enable "ServerTransportPlugin snowflake" on Whonix
> > Gateways
> > by default? And then "ClientTransportPluging snowflake" on workstations
> > beh
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 02:29:19PM -0400, isab...@riseup.net wrote:
> Hello Tor community!
>
> The Core Tor Team would like to improve our release process by getting
> it more tested so bugs are found earlier, so stable releases can get out
> faster and without any big bugs.
>
> During Tor's Meet
Someone on #tor-project IRC reported that you can bypass your pluggable
transport if you use the fingerprint of an ordinary relay already known
to Tor in your bridge line. I would file a ticket but I haven't been
able to reproduce it.
The example the IRC user gave was this, meant to be pasted into
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 10:09:00AM +, nusenu wrote:
> in the context of [1] I'm wondering if it makes sense to add bridge
> support to ornetradar.
>
> If there is any value to automatically detect multiple new bridges:
>
> - Do bridges publish ContactInfo in their descriptor? If not: Why not?
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 01:21:04AM +0800, to...@riseup.net wrote:
> It turned out that the entire code has been commented out and apparently
> Flashproxy became
> out of service. Why? Has the project discontinued, or just down for
> maintenance?
Flash proxy is basically retired now. It was removed
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 03:53:16PM -0800, Katherine Li wrote:
> I would really appreciate user testing on GAEuploader. You can download it
> at:
> https://github.com/katherinelitor/GAEuploader/releases
> README: https://github.com/katherinelitor/GAEuploader
> Tor wiki page, containing step-by-ste
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 12:58:55PM +0100, Massimo La Morgia wrote:
> we are a research group at Sapienza University, Rome, Italy. We do research on
> distributed systems, Tor, and the Dark Web. As part of our work, we have
> developed OnionGatherer, a service that gives up-to-date information about
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 08:27:01AM -0500, Boter42 wrote:
> I think it would be important to have a way to flag/report those websites that
> can't be access by the users while they're using the tor browser.
>
> Is there already a solution to do this? Do you think it would be a good tool?
>
> It
1 - 100 of 298 matches
Mail list logo
