On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 12:03:19AM +0100, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> Is this the same with other PT 1.1 daemons? Or would Snowflake be
> different? Seems like with obfs4, the load balancer using SNI would
> probably be the easiest for the wikipedia use case.
It will be the same with any oth
David Fifield:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 11:41:42AM +, Yawning Angel wrote:
>>> For example, could the obfs4 server side provide a generic SOCKS proxy?
>>
>> There is no functionality for doing such a thing in mainline obfs4proxy.
>>
>> What currently will work is any one of:
>>
>> * Stick a p
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 11:41:42AM +, Yawning Angel wrote:
> > For example, could the obfs4 server side provide a generic SOCKS proxy?
>
> There is no functionality for doing such a thing in mainline obfs4proxy.
>
> What currently will work is any one of:
>
> * Stick a proxy server of your
On 1/23/19 10:42 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> uniqx got the setup working with obfs4 connecting to a port on the
> server side, like a webserver. Weŕe trying to figure out a way to make
> this obfs4 setup to behave like an SSH port forward, but weŕe banging
> our heads against the concept.
Hey all,
Hopefully this is a valid place to ask about PTs technical details. So
n8fr8, uniqx (Michael Pöhn), and I are working to make an easily
reproducible obfs4 client and server setup with ansible scripts
uniqx got the setup working with obfs4 connecting to a port on the
server side, like a
