On 10/6/12, Mike Perry wrote:
> Yet still, as Roger and Robert point out, there are some serious
> questions about the viability of decentralized directory/consensus
> systems. Or, at least questions that sexified attack papers can make to
> seem serious. (For example: I don't believe TorSK was a
Thus spake Jacob Appelbaum (ja...@appelbaum.net):
> >>> 18:10 <@cjd> If someone (with government hat?) tells you they can make
> >>> your
> >>> life hell... I wouldn't fault them for doing what the man says.
> >>> 18:10 <@cjd> *wouldn't fault you
> >>> 18:10 <+eleitl> I'll try bugging some Tor d
On Fri, 05 Oct 2012 12:07:39 +
Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> Huh. Wow. I just... Excuse me? Who suggests that no Tor developers
> haven't already had their arm twisted and stood their ground? Who
> suggests that those who run a Tor Directory Authority would comply
> with the "man" and what "they"
Eugen Leitl:
>>> 18:08 <@cjd> I trust them to make the software right, esp. since I could
>>> check if they did.
>>> 18:09 <@cjd> But a little arm twisting can change someone's motives pretty
>>> fast.
>>> 18:09 <+eleitl> Maintaining signing secrets is a problem.
>>> 18:09 <+eleitl> They should hav
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 01:50:47PM -0400, Robert Ransom wrote:
> > 18:04 <+eleitl> I wonder why they didn't choose UDP
>
> Presumably because TCP was easier.
Yep.
> > 18:05 <@cjd> you need to fall back on tcp in case you're firewalled to hell
> > 18:05 <+eleitl> Apparently, they're thinking abou
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 01:50:47PM -0400, Robert Ransom wrote:
> The v3 network consensus document must be signed by a majority of the
> (currently nine) directory authorities' signing keys. None of the
Nice.
> directory authorities are operated by Tor Project, Inc..
Is there a documented proc
On 10/4/12, Eugen Leitl wrote:
>
> I've had an IRC session with the designer of cjdns (on cjdns)
> who made a few interesting points, and suggestions. Comments?
>
> Verbatim chat snip below.
>
> 18:03 <@cjd> if you took the components from cjdns, you could build a TOR
> like protocol which used UD
I've had an IRC session with the designer of cjdns (on cjdns)
who made a few interesting points, and suggestions. Comments?
Verbatim chat snip below.
18:03 <@cjd> if you took the components from cjdns, you could build a TOR like
protocol which used UDP if
possible and made connecti
I've had an IRC session with the designer of cjdns (on cjdns)
who made a few interesting points, and suggestions. Comments?
Verbatim chat snip below.
18:03 <@cjd> if you took the components from cjdns, you could build a TOR like
protocol which used UDP if
possible and made connecti
