Re: [tor-dev] regarding control spec for hidden service descriptor

2013-09-04 Thread grarpamp
>> # HS descriptor related extension to getinfo event: >> GETINFO desc/hs/n.onion [network] >> >> n.onion fromcache >> n.onion fetchok > I guess that is not used in this case. Yes, it is / should be. It may require a bit of extension to the structure holding the descriptor to carry it around.

Re: [tor-dev] regarding control spec for hidden service descriptor

2013-09-03 Thread Qingping Hou
On Tue 03 Sep 2013 01:25:55 PM EDT, George Kadianakis wrote: > I'm nitpicking a bit below just to give you a taste of some of the > things that you should think about when you start editing torspec. > Thanks for all the feedback! >> >> # Asynchronous events for hs descriptors: >> >> HS_DESC SP RE

Re: [tor-dev] regarding control spec for hidden service descriptor

2013-09-03 Thread George Kadianakis
Qingping Hou writes: > On 09/02/2013 05:01 AM, grarpamp wrote: >> On 9/2/13, grarpamp wrote: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/8510 >> >>> 'fetchfail' or 'fetchok' >> >>> These two status need extended fields >>> fetchfail >>> fetchok >> >> 'fromcache' also needs >>

Re: [tor-dev] regarding control spec for hidden service descriptor

2013-09-03 Thread Qingping Hou
On 09/03/2013 10:02 AM, Damian Johnson wrote: > Hi Qingping. I'll largely leave this to Nick, but here's a ticket > concerning this exact topic... > > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/8891 > Thanks for pointing me to the ticket :) > Personally I'm a little interested in it since

Re: [tor-dev] regarding control spec for hidden service descriptor

2013-09-03 Thread Damian Johnson
Hi Qingping. I'll largely leave this to Nick, but here's a ticket concerning this exact topic... https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/8891 Personally I'm a little interested in it since this would make it worthwhile for me to add a hidden service descriptor parser to stem. I suspect t

Re: [tor-dev] regarding control spec for hidden service descriptor

2013-09-02 Thread Qingping Hou
On 09/02/2013 05:01 AM, grarpamp wrote: > On 9/2/13, grarpamp wrote: >>> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/8510 > >> 'fetchfail' or 'fetchok' > >> These two status need extended fields >> fetchfail >> fetchok > > 'fromcache' also needs >

Re: [tor-dev] regarding control spec for hidden service descriptor

2013-09-02 Thread Qingping Hou
___ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev

Re: [tor-dev] regarding control spec for hidden service descriptor

2013-09-02 Thread grarpamp
On 9/2/13, grarpamp wrote: >> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/8510 > 'fetchfail' or 'fetchok' > These two status need extended fields > fetchfail > fetchok 'fromcache' also needs ___ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org

Re: [tor-dev] regarding control spec for hidden service descriptor

2013-09-02 Thread grarpamp
On 9/2/13, grarpamp wrote: >> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/8510 > 'fetchfail' or 'fetchok' These two status need extended fields fetchfail fetchok ___ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/

Re: [tor-dev] regarding control spec for hidden service descriptor

2013-09-02 Thread grarpamp
> I am currently working on ticket 8510: > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/8510 > > However, I notice that in the control spec, there is no event related to > hidden service descriptors. Should we add a new event in the spec? > > For example, we can have something like the following

[tor-dev] regarding control spec for hidden service descriptor

2013-09-01 Thread Qingping Hou
Hi all, I am currently working on ticket 8510: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/8510 However, I notice that in the control spec, there is no event related to hidden service descriptors. Should we add a new event in the spec? For example, we can have something like the following: H