On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 15:05:05 +0200
Rob van der Hoeven wrote:
> This is what I was looking for. Running the benchmark on two very
> different systems was revealing: on my Pentium G620 the ntor
> server-side time was ~300 uSec, an Allwinner A20 system completed the
> server-side code in ~10600 uSec.
On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 13:57 +, Yawning Angel wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 13:37:24 +0200
> Rob van der Hoeven wrote:
> > 2) The average CPU-time it takes to perform a CREATE/CREATED
> > handshake.
>
> This "depends" entirely on your CPU and which handshake is used, though
> I don't particular
> On 13 Oct 2016, at 00:57, Yawning Angel wrote:
>
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 13:37:24 +0200
> Rob van der Hoeven wrote:
>> 2) The average CPU-time it takes to perform a CREATE/CREATED
>> handshake.
>
> This "depends" entirely on your CPU and which handshake is used, though
> I don't particularly c
On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 13:37:24 +0200
Rob van der Hoeven wrote:
> 2) The average CPU-time it takes to perform a CREATE/CREATED
> handshake.
This "depends" entirely on your CPU and which handshake is used, though
I don't particularly consider TAP handshake performance relevant
because it is slow and
Hi folks,
I'm currently thinking about a new scalable network architecture for
Tor. In order to get some idea about the performance of this
architecture I need some data about the CREATE/CREATED handshake. This
handshake involves PK encryption which is of course time consuming, and
this probably d
