Re: [tor-dev] an alternate MyFamily definition

2012-08-24 Thread tagnaq
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Just stumbled upon Mike's trac entry to change MyFamily too, I'm adding it to this thread as a ref: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/5565 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iF4EAREKAAYFAlA3ZOMACgkQyM26BSNOM7aYXwEAm6a0ZWf5nrFDpRzMLkRsTeS1

Re: [tor-dev] an alternate MyFamily definition

2012-08-24 Thread Karsten Loesing
On 8/23/12 10:12 PM, tagnaq wrote: >> True, but: If one relay disappears for a while then the family may >> break into two if it was the only joint. > > For the family (see #6662): > 3cce3a91f6a625~8DE5 bc1245cbe16d5ee9b2~2D25 > > the connecting relay was down since 2012-04-04 and still karsten

Re: [tor-dev] an alternate MyFamily definition

2012-08-23 Thread tagnaq
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 > True, but: If one relay disappears for a while then the family may > break into two if it was the only joint. For the family (see #6662): 3cce3a91f6a625~8DE5 bc1245cbe16d5ee9b2~2D25 the connecting relay was down since 2012-04-04 and still karste

Re: [tor-dev] an alternate MyFamily definition

2012-08-23 Thread Andreas Krey
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 19:03:06 +, tagnaq wrote: ... > Why? > This would reduce the configuration effort required when adding a new > relay to *two* relays regardless of how many relays are in your family. True, but: If one relay disappears for a while then the family may break into two if it was

[tor-dev] an alternate MyFamily definition

2012-08-23 Thread tagnaq
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, when requesting a new group by feature for compass [1] (#6662 [2]) I discussed with Karsten about how to handle asynchronous/overlapping families: karsten: > Here's an example. Assume we have three relays: A, B, and C. These > relays state the