Re: [tor-dev] Update to Proposal 316: FlashFlow

2020-10-08 Thread Mike Perry
Sorry I had other things to juggle after the meeting. Did not have time to update pad. Adding some additional things we touched on below. On 10/8/20 1:34 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote: > > Hi! We had a meeting about FlashFlow today, including several of the > authors. Here are the notes we wound up

Re: [tor-dev] Update to Proposal 316: FlashFlow

2020-10-08 Thread Nick Mathewson
Hi! We had a meeting about FlashFlow today, including several of the authors. Here are the notes we wound up with for ideas and next straps. Easy changes: * Just use a PRNG; assume we can make them arbitrarily fast. (example candidates: chacha8, shake128.) * Use relay identities as the i

Re: [tor-dev] Update to Proposal 316: FlashFlow

2020-09-17 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 8:26 AM Matt Traudt wrote: > > Hi all > > I polished up the FlashFlow proposal based on the feedback provided by > Teor, Nick, and Mike. I converted it to markdown, and pasted the new > text at the bottom of this email. The updated proposal is also in my > fork of torspec is

[tor-dev] Update to Proposal 316: FlashFlow

2020-09-04 Thread Matt Traudt
Hi all I polished up the FlashFlow proposal based on the feedback provided by Teor, Nick, and Mike. I converted it to markdown, and pasted the new text at the bottom of this email. The updated proposal is also in my fork of torspec is on gitlab [0]; the branch with the changes is "flashflow-revisi