On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> ... Is there any actual harm in the redundant invocation of
> ENGINE_register_all_complete(), or is this about cleanliness/saving
> cycles/something else?
>
> Assuming it's not actually harmful, I'd prefer to leave the call in,
> with a comm
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:57 PM, coderman wrote:
> hello all, Nick,
>
> per the other thread in tor-talk about RDRAND, this is the minor fix
> for OpenSSL 1.0.1+ mentioned.
>
> i don't know that this is useful, and i am still giving the engine
> code a thorough review per Nick's other feedback: "
i was able to confirm the expected behavior using the BADRAND engine
attached to same ticket:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/10402
and also here (do trac tickets ever go away / get deleted?):
https://peertech.org/dist/openssl-1.0.1e-badrand-test.patch
currently Tor on 1.0.1+
hello all, Nick,
per the other thread in tor-talk about RDRAND, this is the minor fix
for OpenSSL 1.0.1+ mentioned.
i don't know that this is useful, and i am still giving the engine
code a thorough review per Nick's other feedback: "Above all, do not
assume
that you understand how OpenSSL works
