On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Damian Johnson wrote:
>> Actually, I think we have a path to get to a less-pure-C Tor
>> implementation. For sandboxing reasons, we'll want to move Tor to
>> work as a set of multiple processes that communicate over well-defined
>> IPC interfaces via a master proc
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Damian Johnson wrote:
> > (What I'm *not* thrilled about is the idea of using an embedded
> > interpreter for this kind of stuff, or embarking on any direction that
> > requires us to rewrite too much of the program at once. That way, in
> > my opinion, lies long
> This part isn't actually true. We review each other's code, and don't
> merge stuff without reviewing it. Further, Andrea is full-time on the
> tor codebase, just like me. The code review slows us down a fair bit,
> but we do do it.
My bad then. From interactions on tickets and commit history
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Damian Johnson wrote:
[...]
> On a side note the appearance of your project has kinda funny timing.
> Just last week I was thinking "Gah! Why does tor's reference
> implementation need to be C?". In my not-so-humble opinion that's
> dragging the application down i
> More seriously, it's not a software intended to be run by Tor users or even
> Tor relay operators, it's a framework intended to be used by Tor developers
> / hackers to play with implementations of the Tor protocol.
Gotcha. It might be worthwhile to clear this with
tor-assista...@lists.torprojec
Hi Damian !
Thanks for your answer.
On 07/23/2013 06:00 PM, Damian Johnson wrote:
* The tor project generally dislikes other projects using the name
'tor' within them. This is why I called my projects arm and stem (arm
was actually originally called tormoni, a name I still like a lot
better)...
Hi Pierre, sounds neat! Two quick thoughts:
* The tor project generally dislikes other projects using the name
'tor' within them. This is why I called my projects arm and stem (arm
was actually originally called tormoni, a name I still like a lot
better)...
https://www.torproject.org/docs/trade
Hi all,
To test the Tor program, I though an independent implementation might
help. I started writing TorPylle with that in mind.
The purpose is NOT to implement a secure or robust implementation that
could be an alternative to Tor.
It relies on Scapy (http://www.secdev.org/projects/scapy/)
