On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 11:47:10PM +0200, tagnaq wrote:
> > Doesn't "make random people into public (middle-only) relays" have the
> > (well maybe not "problem", but "issue"?) that when GFW blocks them, they
> > (the random people who bought an Excito/etc.) won't be able to connect
> > to anything
Fabian Keil wrote:
> and...@torproject.org wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 07:12:25PM +, ja...@appelbaum.net wrote 1.7K
> > bytes in 39 lines about:
> > : I did not suggest a backdoor! I suggested a method of remotely helping
> >
> > This comes across as "it's not a backdoor, it's a h
and...@torproject.org wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 07:12:25PM +, ja...@appelbaum.net wrote 1.7K
> bytes in 39 lines about:
> : I did not suggest a backdoor! I suggested a method of remotely helping
>
> This comes across as "it's not a backdoor, it's a highly secured front
> door that onl
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 04:15:43PM +, ja...@appelbaum.net wrote 15K bytes
in 322 lines about:
: I think we should re-flash with an OS that makes hardening a priority. We
: should only harden the OS in the sense that we should strip out anything
: that we do not require for our uses. Debian and
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 07:12:25PM +, ja...@appelbaum.net wrote 1.7K bytes
in 39 lines about:
: I did not suggest a backdoor! I suggested a method of remotely helping
This comes across as "it's not a backdoor, it's a highly secured front
door that only law enforcement will have access to in o
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Robert Ransom wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:15:43 +
> Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
>
>> I think that we should probably setup a hidden service on each one and
>> ensure that we can remotely administrate them with the consent of the
>> testers. This will help us to
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:15:43 +
Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> I think that we should probably setup a hidden service on each one and
> ensure that we can remotely administrate them with the consent of the
> testers. This will help us to perhaps make some of these choices differently
> down the road
>
> I haven't converted my DreamPlug to Debian yet, but will try to do
> this over the weekend. I'll be sure to document the process as well.
>
Ok. This seems like a good starting point:
http://blog.davideaves.com/archives/2011/03/21/installing_debian_gnulinux_6_0_1_squeeze_on_the_dreamplug/
I lov
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Runa A. Sandvik
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Runa A. Sandvik
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:55 PM, wrote:
>> >> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 01:56:25PM +0100, runa.sand...@gmail.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Runa A. Sandvik wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Runa A. Sandvik
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:55 PM, wrote:
> >> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 01:56:25PM +0100, runa.sand...@gmail.com wrote
> 2.9K bytes in 75 lines about:
> >> : The whole point wit
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Runa A. Sandvik wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:55 PM, wrote:
> > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 01:56:25PM +0100, runa.sand...@gmail.com wrote
> 2.9K bytes in 75 lines about:
> > : The whole point with the Torouter is to allow more people to run a
> > : bridge or a
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Runa A. Sandvik wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:55 PM, wrote:
>> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 01:56:25PM +0100, runa.sand...@gmail.com wrote 2.9K
>> bytes in 75 lines about:
>> : The whole point with the Torouter is to allow more people to run a
>> : bridge or a
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:55 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 01:56:25PM +0100, runa.sand...@gmail.com wrote 2.9K
> bytes in 75 lines about:
> : The whole point with the Torouter is to allow more people to run a
> : bridge or a relay, so I see a web interface as something mandatory. So
> :
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 01:56:25PM +0100, runa.sand...@gmail.com wrote 2.9K
bytes in 75 lines about:
: The whole point with the Torouter is to allow more people to run a
: bridge or a relay, so I see a web interface as something mandatory. So
: yeah, we'd have to make sure that the interface is se
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 07:50:09PM +, ja...@appelbaum.net wrote 15K bytes
in 359 lines about:
: What's the rational there? While we certainly need more bridges, I'd like to
Our funding for this project is to create more bridges to allow censored
users to access the less-censored Internet from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 06/09/2011 09:57 PM, Ian Goldberg wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 07:50:09PM +, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
>>> Sounds like a plan. I prefer bridge by default, but we can discuss that
>>> later.
>>>
>> What's the rational there? While we certainly
>
> > I think it's fine to ship one web interface for us now and later find a
> good
> > integration point with the Freedom Box later...
>
> Yep, I agree.
>
>
Great. I'm sure that if the web UI is free software and it works well, we
can see if the FB will be interested in using it.
> > What's the
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Runa A. Sandvik
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Jacob Appelbaum
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Runa A. Sandvik
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Andrew L
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Ian Goldberg wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 07:50:09PM +, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> > > Sounds like a plan. I prefer bridge by default, but we can discuss that
> > > later.
> > >
> > What's the rational there? While we certainly need more bridges, I'd like
> t
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 07:50:09PM +, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> > Sounds like a plan. I prefer bridge by default, but we can discuss that
> > later.
> >
> What's the rational there? While we certainly need more bridges, I'd like to
> see an increase in relays and encourage more Friend of Friend
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Runa A. Sandvik wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Jacob Appelbaum
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Runa A. Sandvik
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Andrew Lewman
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 15:36:45 -0700
> >> > Ja
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Runa A. Sandvik
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Andrew Lewman
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 15:36:45 -0700
>> > Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
>> >
>> >> > We would also need a way for users to e
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Runa A. Sandvik wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Andrew Lewman
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 15:36:45 -0700
> > Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> >
> >> > We would also need a way for users to easily change the hashed
> >> > password. I can't remember if this is
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Andrew Lewman wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 15:36:45 -0700
> Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
>
>> > We would also need a way for users to easily change the hashed
>> > password. I can't remember if this is a feature that is already
>> > present in Vidalia.
>> Yes, we do need
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Andrew Lewman wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 15:36:45 -0700
> Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
>
> > > We would also need a way for users to easily change the hashed
> > > password. I can't remember if this is a feature that is already
> > > present in Vidalia.
> > Yes, we do
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 15:36:45 -0700
Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> > We would also need a way for users to easily change the hashed
> > password. I can't remember if this is a feature that is already
> > present in Vidalia.
> Yes, we do need a way to change the password. We will also need a way
> to rese
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Runa Sandvik wrote:
> On 7 Jun 2011, at 22:00, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
>
> > On 06/07/2011 01:28 PM, Andrew Lewman wrote:
> >> On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:08:48 +0100
> >> "Runa A. Sandvik" wrote:
> Vidalia is not designed to control or configure a Tor process that
On 7 Jun 2011, at 22:00, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> On 06/07/2011 01:28 PM, Andrew Lewman wrote:
>> On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:08:48 +0100
>> "Runa A. Sandvik" wrote:
Vidalia is not designed to control or configure a Tor process that
it did not start.
>>>
>>> I have tested this, and it works
On 06/07/2011 01:28 PM, Andrew Lewman wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:08:48 +0100
> "Runa A. Sandvik" wrote:
>>> Vidalia is not designed to control or configure a Tor process that
>>> it did not start.
>>
>> I have tested this, and it works just fine. The question is; are we
>> happy with something
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:08:48 +0100
"Runa A. Sandvik" wrote:
> > Vidalia is not designed to control or configure a Tor process that
> > it did not start.
>
> I have tested this, and it works just fine. The question is; are we
> happy with something that works, even if it's being used in a way that
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Robert Ransom wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 06:00:48 -0400
> Nathan Freitas wrote:
>
>> On 05/29/2011 07:21 PM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
>> > Or perhaps we can just turn Tor on by default, ship tor-fw-helper and write
>> > a basic status of Tor out to a static html f
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Tomas Touceda wrote:
> On 03:41 Thu 02 Jun , Robert Ransom wrote:
>> On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 06:00:48 -0400
>> Nathan Freitas wrote:
>>
>> > On 05/29/2011 07:21 PM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
>> > > Or perhaps we can just turn Tor on by default, ship tor-fw-helper and
On 03:41 Thu 02 Jun , Robert Ransom wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 06:00:48 -0400
> Nathan Freitas wrote:
>
> > On 05/29/2011 07:21 PM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> > > Or perhaps we can just turn Tor on by default, ship tor-fw-helper and
> > > write
> > > a basic status of Tor out to a static htm
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 06:00:48 -0400
Nathan Freitas wrote:
> On 05/29/2011 07:21 PM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> > Or perhaps we can just turn Tor on by default, ship tor-fw-helper and write
> > a basic status of Tor out to a static html file?
>
> Why not allow Vidalia running from a LAN-based comput
On 05/29/2011 07:21 PM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> Or perhaps we can just turn Tor on by default, ship tor-fw-helper and write
> a basic status of Tor out to a static html file?
Why not allow Vidalia running from a LAN-based computer to control it?
The control port could autogenerate from the MAC ad
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 4:55 AM, Kyle Williams wrote:
> Hi Runa,
> On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Runa A. Sandvik
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> DreamPlug is a new plug computer from GlobalScale Technologies:
>> http://www.globalscaletechnologies.com/c-5-dreamplugs.aspx. The spec
>> looks go
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 1:01 AM, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Runa A. Sandvik wrote (29 May 2011 23:35:24 GMT) :
>>> Or perhaps we can just turn Tor on by default, ship tor-fw-helper
>>> and write a basic status of Tor out to a static html file?
>
>> Users who aren't familiar with the command line w
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Runa A. Sandvik
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Jacob Appelbaum
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Runa A. Sandvik
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi everyone,
>> >>
>> >> Dre
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 02:01:14AM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If the configuration bits that are relevant to Torouter were managed
> using debconf (and possibly ucf), not only the webui's job would be a
> bit easier to do, but other Debian derivatives (such as the FreedomBox
> and Tails) co
Hi Runa,
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Runa A. Sandvik wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> DreamPlug is a new plug computer from GlobalScale Technologies:
> http://www.globalscaletechnologies.com/c-5-dreamplugs.aspx. The spec
> looks good, it runs Ubuntu by default and it doesn't cost too much. I
> thou
Hi,
Runa A. Sandvik wrote (29 May 2011 23:35:24 GMT) :
>> Or perhaps we can just turn Tor on by default, ship tor-fw-helper
>> and write a basic status of Tor out to a static html file?
> Users who aren't familiar with the command line will probably still
> have a problem configuring Tor. I think
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Runa A. Sandvik wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Jacob Appelbaum
> wrote:
> > On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Runa A. Sandvik <
> runa.sand...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi everyone,
> >>
> >> DreamPlug is a new plug computer from GlobalScale Tech
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Runa A. Sandvik
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> DreamPlug is a new plug computer from GlobalScale Technologies:
>> http://www.globalscaletechnologies.com/c-5-dreamplugs.aspx. The spec
>> looks good, it
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Runa A. Sandvik wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> DreamPlug is a new plug computer from GlobalScale Technologies:
> http://www.globalscaletechnologies.com/c-5-dreamplugs.aspx. The spec
> looks good, it runs Ubuntu by default and it doesn't cost too much. I
> thought that
Hi everyone,
DreamPlug is a new plug computer from GlobalScale Technologies:
http://www.globalscaletechnologies.com/c-5-dreamplugs.aspx. The spec
looks good, it runs Ubuntu by default and it doesn't cost too much. I
thought that the DreamPlug was going to be very user friendly and a
potential cand
45 matches
Mail list logo
