Mahrud S writes:
> Hi George,
>
> I think it looks good. Only comment I have is that it would be nice to have
> an option to change the ipv6 subset, though I imagine people who would use
> it can easily recompile with their own setting.
>
Agreed.
IMO we should open a ticket about making the sub
Hi George,
I think it looks good. Only comment I have is that it would be nice to have
an option to change the ipv6 subset, though I imagine people who would use
it can easily recompile with their own setting.
I'm also including Gabbi who is working on this now.
Best,
Mahrud
On Sat, Sep 15, 201
Mahrud S writes:
> Hi George,
>
> I was trying to find a way to use the virtual port (i.e.
> blahblah.onion:*port*) as dst_port, but I couldn't find a suitable in time.
> For our purposes specifically, we only needed virtual port 443 for https,
> so I hard-coded 443 in an almost identical branch
Hi George,
I was trying to find a way to use the virtual port (i.e.
blahblah.onion:*port*) as dst_port, but I couldn't find a suitable in time.
For our purposes specifically, we only needed virtual port 443 for https,
so I hard-coded 443 in an almost identical branch on top of
0.3.5.0-alpha-dev he
Hello Mahrud,
I wanted to ask if you've been using the #4700 branch and how is it going?
We've been planning to include #4700 in the upcoming 0.3.5 release if
possible, and we remember that you had some pending patches to it. Do
you think you can publish those somewhere if they are to be included
