On 12/12/13 23:40, George Kadianakis wrote:
> David Stainton writes:
>
>> Excellent! I was thinking of making this change but lately I haven't had
>> much time.
>> Merging that patch specified in the 1st ticket comment? That looks good.
>>
>> I'd be happy to update the bananaphone transport to us
David Stainton writes:
> Excellent! I was thinking of making this change but lately I haven't had
> much time.
> Merging that patch specified in the 1st ticket comment? That looks good.
>
> I'd be happy to update the bananaphone transport to use the new api!
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
>
The change is
Excellent! I was thinking of making this change but lately I haven't had
much time.
Merging that patch specified in the 1st ticket comment? That looks good.
I'd be happy to update the bananaphone transport to use the new api!
Cheers,
David
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:33 PM, George Kadianakis w
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 09:33:47PM +, George Kadianakis wrote:
> Do you agree with the changes? If yes, I will merge Ximin's patch for
> #10342, and you will have to update your transport codebase
> appropriately. Please let me know.
For the record, I'm OK with this and replied here:
https://t
Hello Philipp and David,
I'm sending you an email because you are the people who are currently
developing obfsproxy modules.
We are thinking of slightly changing the API of obfsproxy, so that it
becomes more friendly to transport authors (or at least we hope so).
Specifically, we are thinking of
