On Wed, 11 Jan 2017 19:57:07 +0100
ban...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> Its my guess that that timer values added in ISNs should now be
> indistinguishable from the rest of the hashed secret outlined in
> RFC-6528.[1] Can anyone knowledgeable in reading kernel code [2]
> please confirm that this kills
SipHash a fast PRF by DJB has been adopted upstream across the Linux
networking stack landing in 4.11. It deprecates a lot of ancient and
broken crypto like MD5 for initial sequence number hashes.
Its my guess that that timer values added in ISNs should now be
indistinguishable from the rest o
