On 2016-11-26 18:36, Jesse V wrote:
On 11/26/2016 07:50 AM, ban...@openmailbox.org wrote:
While an error in the calculations has been pointed out and the paper
will be withdrawn, this isn't reassuring since a revised version where
this still holds is probable.
Where was this discussed or anno
3) on Scott Aaronson's blog post and the discussion in the comments is the
most information I've seen.
|http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=2996
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 9:36 AM Jesse V wrote:
> On 11/26/2016 07:50 AM, ban...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> >
> > While an error in the calculations has
On 11/26/2016 07:50 AM, ban...@openmailbox.org wrote:
>
> While an error in the calculations has been pointed out and the paper
> will be withdrawn, this isn't reassuring since a revised version where
> this still holds is probable.
Where was this discussed or announced? I'm curious what the issu
In a new paper Peter Shor extends his quantum algorithm to solving a
variant of the Closest Lattice-Vector Problem in polynomial time. With
some future tweaking it can be used against the entire family of Lattice
based crypto.
While an error in the calculations has been pointed out and the pap
