Re: [tor-dev] Revisiting prop224 cells

2016-03-19 Thread David Goulet
On 15 Mar (18:13:02), George Kadianakis wrote: > Hello, > > I took a look at proposal 224 again, with the aim of revisiting the cell > logic and format. > > Here are some matters that require discussion: > > 1) Should we keep backwards compability with old introduction and rendezvous > points?

Re: [tor-dev] Revisiting prop224 cells

2016-03-19 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:25 AM, David Goulet wrote: > On 15 Mar (18:13:02), George Kadianakis wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I took a look at proposal 224 again, with the aim of revisiting the cell >> logic and format. >> >> Here are some matters that require discussion: >> For everybody who wasn't the

[tor-dev] Revisiting prop224 cells

2016-03-15 Thread George Kadianakis
Hello, I took a look at proposal 224 again, with the aim of revisiting the cell logic and format. Here are some matters that require discussion: 1) Should we keep backwards compability with old introduction and rendezvous points? Currently, proposal 224 actually tries to maintain backwards