On 9/16/13 8:28 PM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> some of you may already know our new approach to estimating daily Tor users:
>
> https://metrics.torproject.org/users.html#userstats
>
> This new approach is in beta since April, and I'm quite happy with it.
> I trust the new numbers
On 9/17/13 12:02 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> I think it would be good to write a paragraph or two to answer Matthew's
> question -- why are these new numbers different, and what makes us think
> they're better? I admit I've lost track of the various user counting
> approaches too.
I thought more
On 9/17/13 6:39 PM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> On 9/17/13 6:25 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:53:15AM +0200, Karsten Loesing wrote:
>>> Here are the three graphs just for September, all ending on the
>>> same day:
>>>
>>> https://metrics.torproject.org/users.html?graph=dire
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:53:15AM +0200, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> Here are the three graphs just for September, all ending on the
> same day:
>
> https://metrics.torproject.org/users.html?graph=direct-users&start=2013-09-01&end=2013-09-13&country=all&events=off#direct-users
>
> https://metrics.t
On 9/17/13 6:25 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:53:15AM +0200, Karsten Loesing wrote:
>> Here are the three graphs just for September, all ending on the
>> same day:
>>
>> https://metrics.torproject.org/users.html?graph=direct-users&start=2013-09-01&end=2013-09-13&country=a
On 9/17/13 12:02 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 08:28:21PM +0200, Karsten Loesing wrote:
>> Here's the plan:
>>
>> - Compute user numbers for 2012 and before; the current numbers start
>> on January 1, 2013. This is going to take at least until September 23.
>
> Sounds goo
On 9/17/13 8:38 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 06:02:14PM -0400, Roger Dingledine wrote:
>> I think it would be good to write a paragraph or two to answer Matthew's
>> question -- why are these new numbers different, and what makes us think
>> they're better?
>
> Speaking of
On 9/16/13 11:07 PM, Andrew Lewman wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 20:28:21 +0200
> Karsten Loesing wrote:
>
>> Why do I tell you this?
>>
>> Because the old approach uses resources on our poor, already
>> overloaded metrics machine, and I'm planning to shut down the old
>> approach in the very near
On 9/16/13 10:55 PM, Matthew Finkel wrote:
> Awesome work with these metrics. I am curious, however, why the new
> metrics are more correct than the old ones. The graphs are definitely
> smoother and including the requests to the Dir Auths seems correct,
> but are there other specific reasons for t
On 9/16/13 8:36 PM, Griffin Boyce wrote:
> I would actually really appreciate the old numbers (from ~2007-8/2013)
> being kept online. Estimating growth over time and mapping spikes is
> kind of a big deal to me. =)
I see. How about I put the CSV files for direct and bridge users,
estimated wi
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 06:02:14PM -0400, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> I think it would be good to write a paragraph or two to answer Matthew's
> question -- why are these new numbers different, and what makes us think
> they're better?
Speaking of which:
https://metrics.torproject.org/users.html#dir
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 08:28:21PM +0200, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> Here's the plan:
>
> - Compute user numbers for 2012 and before; the current numbers start
> on January 1, 2013. This is going to take at least until September 23.
Sounds good. That sounds like it will resolve Griffin's question
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 20:28:21 +0200
Karsten Loesing wrote:
> Why do I tell you this?
>
> Because the old approach uses resources on our poor, already
> overloaded metrics machine, and I'm planning to shut down the old
> approach in the very near future. Here's the plan:
>
> - Compute user numb
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 08:28:21PM +0200, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> some of you may already know our new approach to estimating daily Tor users:
>
> https://metrics.torproject.org/users.html#userstats
>
> This new approach is in beta since April, and I'm quite happy with it.
> I
I would actually really appreciate the old numbers (from ~2007-8/2013)
being kept online. Estimating growth over time and mapping spikes is
kind of a big deal to me. =)
~Griffin
On 09/16/2013 02:28 PM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> some of you may already know our new approach to
Hi everyone,
some of you may already know our new approach to estimating daily Tor users:
https://metrics.torproject.org/users.html#userstats
This new approach is in beta since April, and I'm quite happy with it.
I trust the new numbers more than the old ones, both for direct users
and bridge us
16 matches
Mail list logo
