On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 06:06:18PM +, Yawning Angel wrote:
> I'll probably add support for other (user-configurable?) cached content
> providers when I have time. The archive.is person doesn't seem to want
> to respond to e-mail, so asking them to optionally not set X-F-F, seems
> like it'll g
Thanks for the feedback/bug reports so far.
[ PEOPLE THAT HAVE BIG SCARY ADVERSARIES IN THEIR THREAT MODEL
STILL SHOULD NOT USE THIS. ]
This is the third release of the archive.is based captcha-be-gone
extension for Tor Browser.
Relative to 0.0.2, this has a minor bugfix that fixes URLs wi
On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 18:14:26 -0400
Ian Goldberg wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 07:19:30PM +, Yawning Angel wrote:
> > It's not a request header set by the browser. archive.is is acting
> > like a HTTP proxy and explicitly setting X-F-F.
>
> I wonder what would happen if the browser *also
On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 07:19:30PM +, Yawning Angel wrote:
> It's not a request header set by the browser. archive.is is acting
> like a HTTP proxy and explicitly setting X-F-F.
I wonder what would happen if the browser *also* set X-F-F...?
___
tor-
On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 17:00:10 +
ban...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> webcitation.org is an archive.is alternative. Potentially it doesn't
> forward request headers (?)
It's not a request header set by the browser. archive.is is acting
like a HTTP proxy and explicitly setting X-F-F.
From the FAQ:
On 2016-04-01 18:06, Yawning Angel wrote:
On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 18:21:10 +0200
Jeff Burdges wrote:
Are there any more sites where CloudFalre appears on archive.is?
https://www.aei.org/publication/gen-michael-hayden-on-apple-the-fbi-and-data-encryption/
https://archive.is/7u5P8
It's some parti
On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 18:21:10 +0200
Jeff Burdges wrote:
> Are there any more sites where CloudFalre appears on archive.is?
>
> https://www.aei.org/publication/gen-michael-hayden-on-apple-the-fbi-and-data-encryption/
> https://archive.is/7u5P8
>
> It's some particularly harsh CloudFlare configura
Are there any more sites where CloudFalre appears on archive.is?
https://www.aei.org/publication/gen-michael-hayden-on-apple-the-fbi-and-data-encryption/
https://archive.is/7u5P8
It's some particularly harsh CloudFlare configuration perhaps?
Jeff
signature.asc
Description: This is a digita
I'm impressed with how much nicer the web gets with this. Thank you
Yawning! :)
On Sun, 2016-03-27 at 06:12 +, Yawning Angel wrote:
>* (QoL) Skip useless landing pages (github.com/twitter.com will be
> auto-redirected to the "search" pages).
Ahh that's why that happened. lol
>
On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:09:15 +0200
Jens Kubieziel wrote:
> * Yawning Angel schrieb am 2016-03-27 um 08:12 Uhr:
> >* (QoL) Skip useless landing pages (github.com/twitter.com will
> > be auto-redirected to the "search" pages).
>
> When you're logged into Twitter, https://twitter.com/ shows y
* Yawning Angel schrieb am 2016-03-27 um 08:12 Uhr:
>* (QoL) Skip useless landing pages (github.com/twitter.com will be
> auto-redirected to the "search" pages).
When you're logged into Twitter, https://twitter.com/ shows you your
stream of tweets. With the current version, a user can't s
Hello,
Thanks for the feedback so far.
[ PEOPLE THAT HAVE BIG SCARY ADVERSARIES IN THEIR THREAT MODEL
STILL SHOULD NOT USE THIS. ]
New version with changes some that add functionality, some code of
quality stuff, hence a version bump to 0.0.2, especially since it'll
probably be a bit befor
On Wed, 2016-03-23 at 14:09 -0400, Paul Syverson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:33:15PM -0400, Adam Shostack wrote:
> > Random thought: rather than "unreachable from Tor", "unreachable when
> > using the internet safely." This is really about people wanting
> > security, and these companies n
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 2:15 AM, Yawning Angel wrote:
> My "proof of concept" tech demo is what I consider good enough for
> use by brave people that aren't me, so I have put up an XPI package
> at: https://people.torproject.org/~yawning/volatile/cfc-20160323/
Very cool!
> * If archive.is is e
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:33:15PM -0400, Adam Shostack wrote:
> Nice!
>
> Random thought: rather than "unreachable from Tor", "unreachable when
> using the internet safely." This is really about people wanting
> security, and these companies not wanting to grapple with what their
> customers wan
Yawning Angel wrote:
Inspired by https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/18361
I've been working on way to improve the situation.
Neat. In the thread someone mentions that it's possible to derive the
answer for the old-style street number captchas using tesseract [1].
Interestingly,
Nice!
Random thought: rather than "unreachable from Tor", "unreachable when
using the internet safely." This is really about people wanting
security, and these companies not wanting to grapple with what their
customers want.
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 05:31:50PM +0100, Jeff Burdges wrote:
|
| Tha
Thank you, Yawning! This looks great. :)
I think Kate was planning on writing up an official position of the Tor
project on the CloudFlare situation. Amongst other things, it's
expected to contain several strong arguments for convincing sites that
the CAPTCHA does them no good and to make the
During the OONI survey to find instances of server-side Tor blocking, we
found a few variations on CloudFlare captcha pages. They don't all say
"Attention Required!". Apparently there is an option to customize the
page, but few sites make use of it. Here are the regexes we used
(excerpted from http
[I hate replying to myself.]
On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:15:36 +
Yawning Angel wrote:
> My "proof of concept" tech demo is what I consider good enough for
> use by brave people that aren't me, so I have put up an XPI package
> at: https://people.torproject.org/~yawning/volatile/cfc-20160323/
I no
Hello,
Inspired by https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/18361
I've been working on way to improve the situation.
My "proof of concept" tech demo is what I consider good enough for
use by brave people that aren't me, so I have put up an XPI package
at: https://people.torproject.org/~yaw
21 matches
Mail list logo
